Thread: Herman Cain on Hannity now
Results 11 to 20 of 37
|
-
07-02-2011, 02:12 AM
Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil;
Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness;
Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!
21 Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes
And clever in their own sight! Isaiah 5:20-21 NASB
-
-
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Southwest Michigan (in Exile)
- Posts
- 8,757
07-02-2011, 10:20 AM
"Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings..." Patrick Henry
-
07-02-2011, 10:22 AM
Not quite.
http://www.moneychimp.com/features/tax_brackets.htm
Take a look at 2000 and then at 2004.
The highest went from 39.6% to 35%.In most sports, cold-cocking an opposing player repeatedly in the face with a series of gigantic Slovakian uppercuts would get you a multi-game suspension without pay.
In hockey, it means you have to sit in the penalty box for five minutes.
-
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Southwest Michigan (in Exile)
- Posts
- 8,757
07-02-2011, 10:43 AM
"Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings..." Patrick Henry
-
07-02-2011, 10:44 AM
In most sports, cold-cocking an opposing player repeatedly in the face with a series of gigantic Slovakian uppercuts would get you a multi-game suspension without pay.
In hockey, it means you have to sit in the penalty box for five minutes.
-
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Southwest Michigan (in Exile)
- Posts
- 8,757
07-02-2011, 10:49 AM
here's the link i was thinking of
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/menu/cy2003.guest.html"Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings..." Patrick Henry
-
07-02-2011, 12:01 PM
This is funny math. The rich do pay a larger share of the total tax revenue because they have an extremely high portion of the pie to begin with. Even if it's totally skewed in favor or the top 2 percent it will still appear that they are the victims with this statistic.
Let me give you a very rough example: We have 100 people
You have 98 people making $100. Their tax rate is set at 50%.
You also have 2 people making $10,000, their tax rate is set at 25%
In this example, 98% of the population makes little money and they are taxed at TWICE the rate of the top 2%. However, let's look at the total share of taxes:
We end up with $9,900 in total tax revenue, with $5,000 of that being paid by the top 2%. Oh my god, only 2% of the population is paying for OVER HALF of all taxes. That's totally unfair I guess we should lower their tax rate?
Numbers are very easily to manipulate, be careful. Obviously the real life situation is a little more complex than this, but this demonstrates how using the same statistical measure rush quoted there is misleading.Originally Posted by Adam Smith - Wealth of Nations
-
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Southwest Michigan (in Exile)
- Posts
- 8,757
07-02-2011, 12:24 PM
except you would have to completely change your numbers to even FIT with reality.
we will make this easy and say that the total hypothetical taxes are $100,000 (just to make it easy)
50 people pay in a total of $3,460 or 3.46% of the total bill ($69.2/person)
of the 50 remaining who pay the rest of the $96,540
- top 5 pay $54,360 ($10,872/person)
- the next 5 pay $11,480 (2,296/person)
- the rest (40 people) pay $30,700 (767.5/person)
so the burden to pay that $100k is on the top 5 people, now if we could shift it so that more people from the lower come up to the higher brackets by cutting the % that the top 10 people pay who then create more jobs for those bottom 50 or better yet make it so it's easier for those bottom 50 people to start their own companies to move up into the top 50 which in turn make it easier for them to hire people from below them than the % of taxes gets spread around more evenly between more people."Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings..." Patrick Henry
-
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 3,269
07-02-2011, 12:59 PM
I support Cain, and have arranged to give monthly contributions.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
Methinks Devin Nunes may get an...
Today, 11:31 AM in Best/Worst of DU/Discussionist