Thread: Ron Paul being equated to religious fanaticism...

Page 11 of 13 FirstFirst ... 910111213 LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 124
  1. #101  
    Senior Member jnkbortka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Salem, Indiana
    Posts
    380
    Quote Originally Posted by RobJohnson View Post
    Without a military with a huge budget our gov't large or small would be at great risk.
    but ending these wars would save money, and just put it into the defense, instead of unwinnable wars
    If you want to see my political views, check out my profile. i have them on my wall because there wasn't enough room in the info section.
     

  2. #102  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    335
    Quote Originally Posted by jnkbortka View Post
    but ending these wars would save money, and just put it into the defense, instead of unwinnable wars
    Have you ever asked anyone that has served in these wars what they think of how important it is to finish the job and not pull out and leave?
     

  3. #103  
    Senior Member jnkbortka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Salem, Indiana
    Posts
    380
    Quote Originally Posted by noworries View Post
    Have you ever asked anyone that has served in these wars what they think of how important it is to finish the job and not pull out and leave?
    what is the objective? Osama and sadam are dead
    If you want to see my political views, check out my profile. i have them on my wall because there wasn't enough room in the info section.
     

  4. #104  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    335
    Quote Originally Posted by jnkbortka View Post
    what is the objective? Osama and sadam are dead
    Ask some of the ones that are serving here and what they feel about it? I mean I think it is because in my opinion only it is to finish a job and make sure we as a nation are not attacked again. How can one think that even with them being dead they did not have someone just as evil under them that wants to hurt us as a nation once again.
     

  5. #105  
    Resident Grump
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    7,767
    but ending these wars would save money, and just put it into the defense, instead of unwinnable wars
    Define unwinnable. Define victory. Was Iraq worth it? Yes. a small fact pinhead seems to have forgotten..when did Iran abandon its nuclear aspirations? 2003

    What happened in 2003? Duhhhhhhhh.

    Fact: taking out your enemy on their ground is far better than fighting on your own and in a defensive mode, No one wins a defensive war.

    "You do not win a war by dying for your country, you win a war by making the other poor miserable sonofabitch die for HIS country" ...now who said that again?

    The argument about ICBMs is hysterical. You want to use nuclear weapons instead of conventional military hardware?

    Perhaps, but it still seems hypocritical to be on the side of small government and then support a buge military budget and Paul is the only one who's spoken about shutting down bases in places like Europe (which, as it stands is basically subsidizing their defense system so they can fund their various government programs)
    Hey Einstein, where did the last two world wares emanate? EUROPE. Ever hear of active defence? Force projection?

    The comments about supercarriers are also idiotic, force projection anyone?

    Stupid fucking RonBots, your "candidate" is a joke, and NO ONE can take someone seriously who doesnt have the basic common sense to know when NOT to have his photo taken with a NeoNazi and to take money from them as well

    Lets have a look, shall we?


    • Opposes death penalty at state and federal level. (Jan 2008)
    • Changed opinion to anti-death penalty due to many mistakes. (Sep 2007)
    • Opposes “hate crimes” legislation. (Sep 2007)
    • Not appropriate to prosecute all illegal adult pornography. (Sep 2007)
    • Opposes the death penalty. (Jan 2007)
    • Voted NO on enforcing against anti-gay hate crimes. (Apr 2009)
    • Voted YES on funding for alternative sentencing instead of more prisons. (Jun 2000)
    • Voted NO on more prosecution and sentencing for juvenile crime. (Jun 1999)
    • Rated 60% by CURE, indicating mixed votes on rehabilitation. (Dec 2000)
    Oh this is a GEM..............


    • Cut off all foreign aid to Israel & to Arabs. (Dec 2007)
    • Get out of South Korea and let two Koreas unify. (Dec 2007)

    I can think of only ONE way that can happen...Korean War II anybody?

    No foreign aid; no treaties that commit US to future wars.

    Seeya later US allies, thanks for all the blood and sons you have sacrificed, we only give a fuck about ourselves.

    • We don’t need any troops abroad--they don’t help our defense. (Dec 2007)
    • Stop policing the world and we can get rid of income tax. (Dec 2007)
    • Bring all troops home from abroad & save $100B’s every year. (Dec 2007)
    oh and this is the icing on the cake

    We’d be as furious as Muslims are, if our land was occupied.

    Israeli government & the neocons want US to bomb Iran.

    Mercantilist oil dependency was reason for war.

    Thats right, Paul, piss on your allies some more

    NO on implementing US-Singapore free trade agreement: Strongly Opposes topic 13
    NO on implementing free trade agreement with Chile: Strongly Opposes topic 13
    NO on implementing US-Australia Free Trade Agreement: Opposes topic 13

    They dont call him Dr Nuts for nothing.
     

  6. #106  
    Resident Grump
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    7,767
    I might also note that as far as can be determined (no I am NOT making an acct to get into that cesspit), on his next campaign, Dr Snatchpeeper has not told anyone he will not take donations from StormFront.

    A Presidential aspirant who takes donations from white supremacists and the KKK is a lunatic.

    Oh wait.......
     

  7. #107  
    Senior Member jnkbortka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Salem, Indiana
    Posts
    380
    Quote Originally Posted by noworries View Post
    Ask some of the ones that are serving here and what they feel about it? I mean I think it is because in my opinion only it is to finish a job and make sure we as a nation are not attacked again. How can one think that even with them being dead they did not have someone just as evil under them that wants to hurt us as a nation once again.
    again, WHAT IS THE OBJECTIVE?
    If you want to see my political views, check out my profile. i have them on my wall because there wasn't enough room in the info section.
     

  8. #108  
    Senior Member jnkbortka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Salem, Indiana
    Posts
    380
    Quote Originally Posted by Sonnabend View Post
    Stupid fucking RonBots, your "candidate" is a joke, and NO ONE can take someone seriously who doesnt have the basic common sense to know when NOT to have his photo taken with a NeoNazi and to take money from them as well
    I guess Nixon was a communist!
    If you want to see my political views, check out my profile. i have them on my wall because there wasn't enough room in the info section.
     

  9. #109  
    Resident Grump
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    7,767
    Meeting with a head of state is not meeting with as NeoNazi who is NOT a head of state

    One is diplomacy

    The other is idiocy.
     

  10. #110  
    Resident Grump
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    7,767
    again, WHAT IS THE OBJECTIVE?
    To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women. :D
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •