#1 Filipino dwarf Judge Florentino Floro is reinstated07-04-2011, 02:41 AM
Destiny: annihilation of evil.
I am now uploading a real picture of LUIS' U F O JPEG:
Page 1 and Page 2 of the Philippine Supreme Court Resolution dated April 12, 2011 (released on May 25 and received by Judge Floro on June 2-3, 2011: Judicial reinstatement of Judge Floro - Final resolution reversing, setting aside and annulling the March 31, 2006-April 7, 2006 75 pages "Psychosis"-Dismissal from Judicial Service (of Judge Florentino Floro) Judgment. Download July 1, 2011 Supreme Court of the Philippines Letters-Motions of Judge Floro to be paid 9 years back wages, etc. 56 pages, 80 pages Annexes jfsc7
Page 1, of the Verified Omnibus Supplemental Motion-4th Appeal for Reinstatement, April 1, 2011 and Part II
Page 1, Page, 2 and Page 56, last page of the July 1, 2011 79 pages, with 80 pages annexes, or 179 pages Supreme Court Motions-Letters of Judge Floro a) assuming full powers as Judge of Br. 73, RTC, Malabon, as of April 12, 2011, b) asking the Supreme Court Finance Office Chief to pay him 9 years back wages, salaries and economic benefits, based on the present P 80,000 per month ($1 = 43.45) salary and c) asking the Court tor rule, if it will accept his retirement or resignation; and alternatively, if it will oblige Judge Floro to continue in office or be promoted.
WSJ portrait of Judge Floro;
Florentino Floro: Judicial Reinstatement as Presiding Judge of Br. 73, RTC, Malabon-Navotas, Metro Manila, NCJR., at Sisa St., Golden Dale Subd., Tinajeros, Malabon City
On March 31, 2006, the Supreme Court ruled that Judge Floro consults three wee friends, LUIS, Armand and Angel; loses his job but becomes a celebrity; using a little elfin magic; Luz D. Puno, wife of Chief Justice Reynato S. Puno died on April 12, 2006, just 5 days from dismissal of Judge Floro on April 7, 2006, birthday of dwarf Angel.
Released on April 7, 2006, the 75 pages "OCAD vs. Judge Floro" "Psychosis" Judgment was appealed by Florentino Floro per a 31 pages Motion for Reconsideration-Appeal.
The Duende Judge sought
reinstatement on May 4, 2006 invoking thereafter in the June 6, 2006 Appeal: "I used to be a Judge"; but the appeals were junked and the Filipino 'dwarf' judge loses case, based on the 7 pages SC Resolution of August 11, 2006.
Undaunted, Florentino and the three dwarves, on September 02, 2006 bombarded the Court with multiple appeals threatening it with dire accidents and horrible deaths.
In a chilli-hot year for whiny garbage, David Pannick, QC, presides over the memorable legal appearances, Judge Floro won the Judge of the Year coveted Award on December 6, 2006.
Judge Floro went wild and cursed the Supreme Court. The Per Curiam July 12, 2007 final judgment denied all Appeals of the dwarves and cited Floro in contempt of court. The Court warned Floro: ‘Stop filing appeals or be cited in contempt’.
On June 3, 2008, the April 4, 2008 last "Blue Madonna" Appeal of Judge Floro was junked by the Court on the 25th year anniversary of LUIS, Armand and Angel's 1st appearance to Floro's brother Robert, on June 2, 1983.
In the aftermath and unusual circumstances,, which incules 5 mystic court fires, and unexplained series of car accidents, illnesses, surgeries and deaths of Philippines jurists and lawyers, the Court was forced to reconsider Floro's 12 years dismissal for service.
The Philippine media has not published this landmark Resolution for Floro cursed the Philippine journalists.
All these uploaded Court documents are verifiable since the Court phone numbers are uploaded in the jpegs.
07-08-2011, 12:38 PM
So does this mean you are going to be back in court soon?
07-08-2011, 10:41 PM
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Peoples Democratic Socialist Republic of Michiganistanovia
Dwarves get their own judges in the Philippines?
Learn something new every day.
07-08-2011, 10:45 PM
Some how the world feels safer tonight!:)How is obama working out for you?
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Peoples Democratic Socialist Republic of Michiganistanovia
#6 Fat Burger07-09-2011, 02:23 AM
For those who have not gone to our beautiful country, the Philippines (composed of more than 7,000 islands, 98% Pnoys with religions, including 90% Catholics and less than 1% atheists), is populated by Justices and Doctors, inter alia, who believe in creatures features called spirit guides or elementals (air, water, earth and fire: the dwarves, gnomes, fairies, aswangs, witches, etc.)
Thus, WSJ's James Hookway wrote LUIS, Armand and Angel:
"As a trial-court judge, Florentino V. Floro Jr. acknowledged that he regularly sought the counsel of three elves only he could see. The Supreme Court deemed him unfit to serve and fired him last year.
Case closed? Not in the Philippines, where vampires are said to prey on unwary travelers and wealthy politicians consult fortune tellers and card readers. Mr. Floro, 54 years old, has become a media celebrity. He is now wielding his new clout to campaign for the return of his job -- and exact vengeance on the Supreme Court."
James miserably failed to check out the Filipino dictionary on folklore and mythology, confusing himself and the world on the basic ramifications between earth elementals, specifically, duendes or dwarves vis-a-vis the elves. So much for that, now.
On Freedom of Religious belief and expression, PHL and US Constitutions protect beliefs in God, atheism, and even satanism. You and Justices can consult God, Allah, the Saints, Satan, Idols, like the Rice God and our Filipino Anitos, including the Spaghetti Monster; they can even hate God, but Magistrates cannot consult duendes, fairies and all those spirits included in Filipino mythology and legends, like imaginary dwarves. Philippine psychology and psychiatry did ban all those who believe in and consult duendes, for they are outside the alleged normal curve of sane Filipino society.
The April 12 Resolution is very clear. Please read the long legal disquisition below, as I and you await the SC Resolution to be issued later ruling on my 180 pages July 1, 2011 Letter-Request asking the SC Finance Chief to release the 9 years check fat burger, and to rule if they would accept my reinstatement, DONE by the April 12 SC Res.
AND THE THREE DWARVES
Just months before Floro's natal day on planet earth on November 5, 1953, dwarves were utterly ignorant of this kind of animal.
It never crossed my mind that I would be reinstated and fed this fat burger.
It was about March, 2011, the Black Nazarene lights from my 2 palms were seen by a fortune-teller whom I healed of epilepsy. While reading the tarrot, he predicted that 7 SC Justices of 15 are on my side.
Mr. Larry Domingo, age 84, a Rosicrucianism expert since 1960, computed that more than 7 SC Justices are afraid of my dire prophecy. Hence, I filed this 4th appeal on April 1 First Friday, it being the last since the Final Appeal on April 4, 2008, which was denied-expunged from the Rollo by the Court on June 2-3, 2008, exactly 25 years from the first night that LUIS, Armand and Angel appeared to my brother Robert.
Dearest bijou, Madisonian, Rockntractor, and all of you who, once upon a time read this fairy tale,
In the recent case of People vs. Hubert Jeffrey P. Webb, the Court held:
"A judgment of acquittal cannot be reconsidered because it places the accused under double jeopardy. The Constitution provides in Section 21, Article III, that: Section 21. No person shall be twice put in jeopardy of punishment for the same offense. x x x" In this regard, the rule on dismissal and reinstatement of judges are on par with the jurisprudence on conviction and acquittal of an accused.
The one sentence April 12, 2011 GRANT Resolution is a verdict of acquittal. Meaning therefore, that: Judge Floro's March 31, 2006 dismissal is reversed IN TOTO, that is, Floro is back, as if there is/was no case filed against the 3 dwarves, and that all the 13 charges (including dwarf-psychosis accusations-findings) are reversed, set aside and a new judgment is rendered forthwith.
Philippine adminstrative and criminal laws on judges and the accused were borrowed from the US Constitution's Fifth Amendment and CA Federal Rules of Service.
In 2004, the Court established a 2-3 Appeal Rule on dismissal of Judges, that is, one appeal per one dwarf: only 1 motion for reconsideration per 1 duende, so to speak.
A.M. No. RTJ-03-1812, November 18, 2004, "Soria vs. Judge Villegas" provides:
"While indeed a second motion for reconsideration is a prohibited pleading under the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, we have allowed it in certain cases. Besides, in administrative cases involving discipline of judges and court personnel, we have allowed second or even third motions for reconsideration whenever justified by the circumstances.The penalty of dismissal from the service which we have imposed on respondent may seem, indeed, to be harsh. There were administrative cases of more serious nature where we have been less harsh. WHEREFORE, in light of the foregoing, the Second Motion for Reconsideration of respondent is hereby given due course, and is partly granted. The penalty of dismissal from the service imposed on respondent is hereby REDUCED to suspension for a period reckoned from the time respondent received a copy of the decision of 19 November 2003 until he shall re-assume office by virtue of this Resolution, which he must do within ten (10) days from notice of this Resolution."
In the 17 pages Verified Omnibus Supplemental Motion-4th Appeal for Reinstatement filed on/dated April 1, 2011, Judge Floro pleaded to the Court and moved for -
"Accordingly, to Correct-Amend-Revise the Cursed (under Pslams 109/73) Decision and Resolutions (in these cases) dated 31 March 2006 Decision and 11 August 2006 and 12 July 2007, respectively, to this effect: To Rectify, inter alia, the half-truths and falsities: a) that Judge Floro consults dwarves, LUIS, Armand and Angel in writing decisions, b) that Judge Floro is afflicted with psychosis, and c) that Judge Floro delayed these cases for 3 years, inter alia, and
Conditionally, to alternatively Grant this Resignation-Retirement Offer of Judge Floro, after Full Supreme Court Reinstatement xxx."
The one sentence April 12, 2011 GRANT Resolution, however, abandoned the Soria vs Villegas 2004 rule: a 4th appeal is now allowed; the Court even GRANTED it, since Floro is now a duende, alien though, with magic lights emanating from his 2 palms annihilating Justices and Philippine journalists by car accidents and dire pains.
In the 31 March 2006 DecisionPonente Justice Minita Chico-Nazario (wife of Rod Nazario, manager of Manny Pacquiao, who died of lung cancer on September 23, 2009), ruled:
"The period of three years seems to us the most equitable under the circumstances. As discussed, if we were to give him more than three years of back salaries, etc., then it would seem that we are rewarding him for his role in delaying the resolution of these cases (as well as the seven cases he filed which were only dismissed on 14 February 2006 at his own bidding). On the other hand, if we were to peg the period at less than three years then the same would only be a pittance compared to the seven years suspension he had to live through with Damocles’ sword hanging over his head and with his hands bound as he could not practice his profession.
3) As a matter of equity, AWARD Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr. back salaries, allowances and other economic benefits corresponding to three (3) years; xxx."
The April 12 GRANT Resolution declared that: 1) Judge Floro is cured of Psychosis, 2) never consulted and will never consult dwarves, unless Justices should again ridicule the 3 duendes, and 3) perforce, Judge Floro is entitled to be paid by the SC Finance Chief, additional 3 years backwages, etc.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|