Results 1 to 3 of 3
#1 Obama Kills Another 500,000 Non-Union Jobs
07-30-2011, 10:43 AM
- Join Date
- May 2008
Obama just destroyed another 500,000 jobs for Americans- at least ones who aren’t unionized. .
Flanked by flunkies from the government-dependent auto makers, the world’s largest shareholder in the American auto industry, Brarack Obama, imposed increased fuel standards on companies making cars in the United States. By 2025 auto makers will have to meet fuel efficiency standards that brings “new cars to 54.5 miles a gallon by 2025, roughly double the current level, in a bid to reduce U.S. oil consumption,” says the Wall Street Journal.
According to the Journal effort by the administration to raise the current fuel standard just to “the 35.5 mpg target by 2016 will cost the industry more than $50 billion.” The administration didn’t provide the Journal with costs for the 2025 standard but expect it to cost a ton, jobs-wise and financially.
$50 billion is about 100,000 American jobs- that’s non-union jobs.
That, in short is where all the jobs have gone under the Obama administration.
Makes one wonder if the only reason why the president doesn’t ban cars altogether is because of the union jobs.
Non-union jobs just aren’t that big of a deal.
As the foreign auto makers point out the rules are written to favor the Detroit, union-controlled, domestic auto makers.
“Not all auto makers support Mr. Obama's plan,” says the Journal.
“German auto makers Daimler AG and Volkswagen AG both declined to send representatives to Mr. Obama's announcement. Representatives for both companies, whose sales in the U.S. are dominated by passenger cars, said the deal would put their companies at a disadvantage, by setting relatively modest requirements for large pickups like the kind that Detroit auto makers like GM, Ford and Chrysler have long produced.”
Coincidentally, the United Auto Workers have targeted German automaker Volkswagen AG’s Tennessee plant as “a focal point in union efforts to gain a foothold among foreign auto makers' U.S. manufacturing operations,’ reports the Journal in a separate story.
On Thursday I wrote about how the SEIU is facing racketing charges related to possibly using federal regulatory pressure against private companies in order to facilitate union organizing in non-union shops.
While thus far there have been no allegations regarding the UAW, there certainly is the consequent regulatory pressure.
As The Journal notes: “The union has run into particularly stiff opposition at foreign-owned plants in Tennessee and other Southern states, where cultural sentiment against unions runs deep and right-to-work laws allow workers to opt out of unions where they exist. Nissan workers in Tennessee rejected UAW representation by 2-1 ratios in 2001 and 1989.”
Ah, but it’s nothing a little regulatory pressure can’t get around.
07-30-2011, 10:53 AM
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
As far as I understand, these new standards are not the result of regulation at all, but the result of an agreement!
That's important. Now, The Pres can brag about what a fine job he has done about saving the environment and all. Later, the agreement can be ignored. Which is good, because no one is going to buy 54MPG cars anyway.
I think it's all a scam. Automakers know they won't ever build those cars; and Obama knows it too.
07-30-2011, 10:37 PMNissan workers in Tennessee rejected UAW representation by 2-1 ratios in 2001 and 1989.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|