Communist Party USA Endorses Obama for 4 More Years

[Wei Wu Wei]

What a worthless communist party.

They should be supporting or creating a third party, giving their support to a corporatist elitist party like the Democrats is absolutely stupid.

[Wei Wu Wei]

Unfortunately I cannot find the endorsement anywhere. Google is only bringing up pages and pages of forum posts. It seems as if it wasn't the Communist Party that endosed Obama, but perhaps Sam Webb himself, but even that I can't find. I was hoping to find something in writing to show some friends of mine who'll get quite a chuckle if this is true.


edit: found it lol

http://transitional.pww.org/does-it-...ch-party-wins/

[Odysseus]

What a worthless communist party.

They should be supporting or creating a third party, giving their support to a corporatist elitist party like the Democrats is absolutely stupid.

They're communists, which makes them worse than worthless. They're shills for mass murder. The fact that they don't have a problem with the Democrats puts the lie to your claim that they are not fellow travellers.

[namvet]

The Agenda - Grinding America Down

[youtube]xQf_QfitmKE[/youtube]

[Novaheart]

Just so I am clear on this:

Is it the consensus of the clucking in this thread that the endorsement of a candidate by a group means that candidate is a member of that group or supports that group's agenda?

[djones520]

Just so I am clear on this:

Is it the consensus of the clucking in this thread that the endorsement of a candidate by a group means that candidate is a member of that group or supports that group's agenda?

I'd say, to an extent yes. If a radical group is endorsing you, it's because they believe you would best represent their interests.

It should more just be something to raise the eyebrows. "Communists like Obama? Well that's not really good." That sort of thing.

[Wei Wu Wei]

I'd say, to an extent yes. If a radical group is endorsing you, it's because they believe you would best represent their interests.

It should more just be something to raise the eyebrows. "Communists like Obama? Well that's not really good." That sort of thing.

The article in question doesn't say that the Democrats best support the interests of the communist party. It's more of a "the democrats suck, but the republicans are a nightmare".

Frankly, I think that argument is stupid at this point in history.

I'd hardly say that communists like Obama, just that this organisation will support whoever will prevent Republicans from being in power. If you read the comments from the article, many people do not agree with that strategy.

I know leftists, people who identify as socialist and communist, and none of them "like Obama".

[lacarnut]

I know leftists, people who identify as socialist and communist, and none of them "like Obama".

They will vote for the Magic Negro come election time cause he is the only game in town that even remotely matches their ideology

BTW, you sure know a bunch of f.....d up people. Where do you live?

[Apache]

The article in question doesn't say that the Democrats best support the interests of the communist party. It's more of a "the democrats suck, but the republicans are a nightmare".

So, in other words, "it's because they believe you would best represent their interests."


Stop with the double-speak

[lacarnut]

Just so I am clear on this:

Is it the consensus of the clucking in this thread that the endorsement of a candidate by a group means that candidate is a member of that group or supports that group's agenda?

You are bad wrong so not playing that game... go cluck elsewhere.