Thread: Communist Party USA Endorses Obama for 4 More Years

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 48
  1. #11  
    Our widdle friend. Wei Wu Wei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,414
    What a worthless communist party.

    They should be supporting or creating a third party, giving their support to a corporatist elitist party like the Democrats is absolutely stupid.
    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Smith - Wealth of Nations
    It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
     

  2. #12  
    Our widdle friend. Wei Wu Wei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,414
    Unfortunately I cannot find the endorsement anywhere. Google is only bringing up pages and pages of forum posts. It seems as if it wasn't the Communist Party that endosed Obama, but perhaps Sam Webb himself, but even that I can't find. I was hoping to find something in writing to show some friends of mine who'll get quite a chuckle if this is true.


    edit: found it lol

    http://transitional.pww.org/does-it-...ch-party-wins/
    Last edited by Wei Wu Wei; 08-05-2011 at 04:16 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Smith - Wealth of Nations
    It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
     

  3. #13  
    LTC Member Odysseus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    FT Belvoir, VA
    Posts
    15,639
    Quote Originally Posted by Wei Wu Wei View Post
    What a worthless communist party.

    They should be supporting or creating a third party, giving their support to a corporatist elitist party like the Democrats is absolutely stupid.
    They're communists, which makes them worse than worthless. They're shills for mass murder. The fact that they don't have a problem with the Democrats puts the lie to your claim that they are not fellow travellers.
    --Odysseus
    Sic Hacer Pace, Para Bellum.

    Before you can do things for people, you must be the kind of man who can get things done. But to get things done, you must love the doing, not the people!
     

  4. #14  
    Senior Member namvet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Western Mo
    Posts
    2,952
    The Agenda - Grinding America Down

    [youtube]xQf_QfitmKE[/youtube]
    Liberals: Obama's useful Idiots
     

  5. #15  
    Fabulous Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    10,161
    Just so I am clear on this:

    Is it the consensus of the clucking in this thread that the endorsement of a candidate by a group means that candidate is a member of that group or supports that group's agenda?
     

  6. #16  
    Zoomie djones520's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    10,050
    Quote Originally Posted by Novaheart View Post
    Just so I am clear on this:

    Is it the consensus of the clucking in this thread that the endorsement of a candidate by a group means that candidate is a member of that group or supports that group's agenda?
    I'd say, to an extent yes. If a radical group is endorsing you, it's because they believe you would best represent their interests.

    It should more just be something to raise the eyebrows. "Communists like Obama? Well that's not really good." That sort of thing.
    In most sports, cold-cocking an opposing player repeatedly in the face with a series of gigantic Slovakian uppercuts would get you a multi-game suspension without pay.

    In hockey, it means you have to sit in the penalty box for five minutes.
     

  7. #17  
    Our widdle friend. Wei Wu Wei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,414
    Quote Originally Posted by djones520 View Post
    I'd say, to an extent yes. If a radical group is endorsing you, it's because they believe you would best represent their interests.

    It should more just be something to raise the eyebrows. "Communists like Obama? Well that's not really good." That sort of thing.
    The article in question doesn't say that the Democrats best support the interests of the communist party. It's more of a "the democrats suck, but the republicans are a nightmare".

    Frankly, I think that argument is stupid at this point in history.

    I'd hardly say that communists like Obama, just that this organisation will support whoever will prevent Republicans from being in power. If you read the comments from the article, many people do not agree with that strategy.

    I know leftists, people who identify as socialist and communist, and none of them "like Obama".
    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Smith - Wealth of Nations
    It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
     

  8. #18  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    11,970
    Quote Originally Posted by Wei Wu Wei View Post
    I know leftists, people who identify as socialist and communist, and none of them "like Obama".
    They will vote for the Magic Negro come election time cause he is the only game in town that even remotely matches their ideology

    BTW, you sure know a bunch of f.....d up people. Where do you live?
     

  9. #19  
    Senior Member Apache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Tree rats are watching you
    Posts
    6,728
    Quote Originally Posted by Wei Wu Wei View Post
    The article in question doesn't say that the Democrats best support the interests of the communist party. It's more of a "the democrats suck, but the republicans are a nightmare".
    So, in other words, "it's because they believe you would best represent their interests."


    Stop with the double-speak
    Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem.
    Ronald Reagan

    We could say they are spending like drunken sailors. That would be unfair to drunken sailors, they're spending their OWN money.
    Ronald Reagan

    R.I.P. Crockspot
     

  10. #20  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    11,970
    Quote Originally Posted by Novaheart View Post
    Just so I am clear on this:

    Is it the consensus of the clucking in this thread that the endorsement of a candidate by a group means that candidate is a member of that group or supports that group's agenda?
    You are bad wrong so not playing that game... go cluck elsewhere.
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •