Queer Preacher Takes on Mike Adams Phd his Letter In Attempt To Have Dr.Adams Fired :

[wilbur]

Are you confused ?

Just amazed, really.

[Space Gravy]

to be honest, I don't watch any minister's sermons and think about them having sex with another man OR woman.

Jim and Tammy Fae Baker..........Ewwwwwww!:eek:

[FlaGator]

Just amazed, really.

If I could visualizie any male priest or minister having sex with a man, I pretty certain that would classify me as a homosexual or maybe just deeply distrubed.

[noonwitch]

If I could visualizie any male priest or minister having sex with a man, I pretty certain that would classify me as a homosexual or maybe just deeply distrubed.

It's easy to imagine anything these days, whether it's because of the stuff you see on the internet or because of the stuff you see on tv.

OZ has made it possible for me to visualize men having sex, the way viewing one porno flick has made it possible to visualize women having sex.

[wineslob]

Professing to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man -- and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things. Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator…. For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.

Leviticus 20:13 "If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads."

Pretty much says it all.

[Gingersnap]

It's easy to imagine anything these days, whether it's because of the stuff you see on the internet or because of the stuff you see on tv.

OZ has made it possible for me to visualize men having sex, the way viewing one porno flick has made it possible to visualize women having sex.

See, this is why I stick with News of the Weird. I may be easily able to visualize a kid with 8 limbs or a goat with two heads or even the Montauk monster but I'm not troubled by intrusive sexual imagery from porn. I've never even heard of OZ in this context. Thankfully.

[megimoo]

See, this is why I stick with News of the Weird. I may be easily able to visualize a kid with 8 limbs or a goat with two heads or even the Montauk monster but I'm not troubled by intrusive sexual imagery from porn. I've never even heard of OZ in this context. Thankfully.

I thankfully have no trouble with listening to people speaking, male or female ,without stray images popping into my mind.People of reputation like Billie Graham or the Pope speaking about their experiences with GOD are very real and are to be looked up to because of their sterling reputations and their faith .

But if a former female x rated video pron star with a wide circulation that I had seen gave a similar
testimony there would be image problems !

The same is true on meeting a new customer or client I haven't met before and listening to them talk about their needs I tend to form opinions as I listen to them talk,I think that we all do.If they seem to know the technical details of their problems I would grow in admiration of them and their grasp of what is needed to solve their problem.

[PoliCon]

Wow.

On this - we agree.

[MrsSmith]

to be honest, I don't watch any minister's sermons and think about them having sex with another man OR woman.

Yeah, no kidding. Sheesh. :eek: I wouldn't enjoy this man's preaching because he obviously hasn't studied the subject he's teaching, but that would be about it. I think meg was a little stressed out, or something.

[MrsSmith]

Originally Posted by wilbur
Wow.

On this - we agree.

I don't know...I have to wonder just how he meant that 'Wow." Was it negative, or positive?? :eek: