This really isn't all that meaningful. IN reading the article, the term "welfare" is being applied to a broad range of benefits. I would imagine that there are many Americans whose only benefit is a child or children on free or reduced lunch in school who do not consider themselves to be on welfare. By the same token, there are probably a lot of seniors who are getting some benefit that some would consider welfare.
One specious jump is that a benefit utilized by a child equates to his parent being on welfare. If this is the case, then there are a number of senior citizens and others who have gotten custody of related or unrelated children who would themselves be considered to be on welfare, even though they live in a paid for $300,000 house and drive a new car.
Surveys like this measure many things, truth and accuracy aren't at the top.
Queerdom and being a liberal must really screw up your brain when you post stupid shit like this.
The prosecutor said that some of the witness testimony didn't even jibe with what they first told the police which is incredibly stupid considering both their testimony and the written statements to...