I'm behind on the bills - but I'm donating $50 in honor of this

[Teetop]

I would say buy a clue, but $50 wouldn't cover the medical bills, needed for that moonbat DUmmie. :D

[jeskibuff]

What is "this beautiful smackdown" it's talking about?

The brilliant move of attacking Bristol Palin?

It couldn't be this lipstick comment, could it? If that's what they consider a smackdown, Obama's going to be standing in a yellow puddle every single time he has to debate McCain.

[cowbell]

Because A: they said they are behind on thier bills, which should take a much higher priority than sending skinner cash and 2: they will expect taxpayer support for those bills they chose not to pay.

If a person choses to spend money foolishly, that's their choice. I've done plenty of it. When they expect someone else to bail them out for it, they need a steel toe boot to their backside.

oh come on, there is no way you could even know that!

[enslaved1]

oh come on, there is no way you could even know that!

It's coming from a DU'er, making it a fairly safe assumption. The vast majority of them are socialist slobs who want to sit in mommy and daddy's basement, smoke dope, eat cheetos and get checks from the government. Find me evidence that this putz is different and I will gladly apologize.

[cowbell]

well personally, i dont feel the need to make snap generalizations on people i dont even know, and about labeling all liberals as socialist pot smoking cheeto eating slobs is something i choose not to do. until i meet every single liberal there is, and they turn out to be socialist slobs, i will refrain from assuming things about a group of people i dont know. however, you can, and will, make all the snap judgements you want. and thats fine. such is the beauty of choice.

[enslaved1]

The assumption is based on 1. the fact that the person is willing to throw $50 to a multimilliion dollar campaign when they are behind on thier personal responsibilities and B. the fact that the person has +1000 posts on DU. I also specificly stated that the vast majority of the DU, not all liberals, are socialist slobs. Many liberals are not slobs. :D

[AmPat]

well personally, i dont feel the need to make snap generalizations on people i dont even know, and about labeling all liberals as socialist pot smoking cheeto eating slobs is something i choose not to do. until i meet every single liberal there is, and they turn out to be socialist slobs, i will refrain from assuming things about a group of people i dont know. however, you can, and will, make all the snap judgements you want. and thats fine. such is the beauty of choice.

*sniff* sniff*

I smell TROLL!