Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13
  1. #11  
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    16,157
    Am I the only one who noticed this:
    The bill would only authorize UC and CSU to consider race, gender, ethnicity and other factors in admissions decisions, but will not mandate them to do so, the newspaper reported.
    Other factors...you mean like political affiliation?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    Senior Member Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,155
    Quote Originally Posted by NJCardFan View Post
    Am I the only one who noticed this:


    Other factors...you mean like political affiliation?
    They Prolly mean sexual preferences.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    Fabulous Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    10,161
    Quote Originally Posted by Bailey View Post
    They Prolly mean sexual preferences.
    I'm still thinking you guys are taking this wrong, and it's kind of funny that you are in your paranoid way.

    This is about the California University system having "too many Asians". I will bet you fifty cents.

    California is 13% mongoloid, but UC Berkeley (the flagship of the system and a competitive admissions campus) was 47% "asian" as of 2009.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •