Report: Assad threatens to attack Tel Aviv in case of NATO strike

**Rockntractor** · 10-05-2011, 12:25 AM

In meeting with Turkish FM, Syrian president discusses possibility of NATO strike, says 'I won't need more than six hours to transfer hundreds of rockets to Golan to fire at Tel Aviv'

Ynet Published: 10.04.11, 19:15 / Israel News

Syrian President Bashar Assad on Tuesday threatened to set fire to the Middle East, and especially to Israel, if NATO attacks Syria, the Iranian Fars news agency reported.

In a meeting with Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, Assad said: "If a crazy measure is taken against Damascus, I will need not more than six hours to transfer hundreds of rockets and missiles to the Golan Heights to fire them at Tel Aviv."

Davutoglu reportedly conveyed a message of warning from the US to Assad. The Iranian report has not been verified by other sources.

According to the Fars news agency, the Syrian president stressed that Damascus will also call on Hezbollah in Lebanon to launch a fierce rocket and missile attack on Israel, one that Israeli intelligence could never imagine.

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...131259,00.html

**KhrushchevsShoe** · 10-06-2011, 06:37 PM

Well if NATO attacks them they are entitled to retaliate, and we know the only reason NATO would attack them is more Israeli bullshit, so they are probably a viable target for that retaliation.

**Rockntractor** · 10-06-2011, 11:46 PM

Originally Posted by KhrushchevsShoe

Well if NATO attacks them they are entitled to retaliate, and we know the only reason NATO would attack them is more Israeli bullshit, so they are probably a viable target for that retaliation.

You're pretty sharp, I'm surprised some government think tank hasn't snatched you up!

**Odysseus** · 10-08-2011, 03:44 PM

Originally Posted by Rockntractor

You're pretty sharp, I'm surprised some government think tank hasn't snatched you up!

Yeah, with a butterfly net.

Most NATO countries are only marginally less hostile to Israel than the Arabs. Does anyone really expect Germany or France to act on Israeli interests?

NATO won't act, because unlike Libya, Syria has serious air defenses and enough standing forces to put up a real fight. The only NATO member that has the resources to take out Assad, and the transportation capability to get them there, is the US, and Obama isn't about to go there.

**djones520** · 10-08-2011, 03:55 PM

Originally Posted by KhrushchevsShoe

Well if NATO attacks them they are entitled to retaliate, and we know the only reason NATO would attack them is more Israeli bullshit, so they are probably a viable target for that retaliation.

Yeah... because it wouldn't be that Syria is perpetrating worse crimes on it's own citizens then Libya was when NATO attacked them. But Ody quite clearly explained why we wouldn't go there.

You fucking tard.

Israel doesn't need our help to kick Syria's ass anyways. They've done it so many times they've got an SOP written on it.

**Novaheart** · 10-08-2011, 04:08 PM

Originally Posted by KhrushchevsShoe

Well if NATO attacks them they are entitled to retaliate, and we know the only reason NATO would attack them is more Israeli bullshit, so they are probably a viable target for that retaliation.

What? You should clarify this post.

**AmPat** · 10-08-2011, 06:59 PM

Report: Assad threatens to attack Tel Aviv in case of NATO strike

Or:

If you hurt my feewings, I'm gonna kick this sleeping bear.

**Articulate_Ape** · 10-08-2011, 07:16 PM

Originally Posted by Rockntractor

You're pretty sharp, I'm surprised some government think tank hasn't snatched you up!

Or septic tank.

**AmPat** · 10-09-2011, 11:29 AM

[QUOTE]Let us see what resident retard has for us.

Well if NATO attacks them

Unlikely

they are entitled to retaliate

,
Something about Sherlock.

and we know the only reason NATO would attack them is more Israeli bullshit

,
Another asinine assumption and completely unfounded opinion by a liberal.

so they are probably a viable target for that retaliation.

Wait! I thought the "retaliation" was Syria after a (fantasy) NATO attack? Would you please take your meds and re-do this mess?

**Hansel** · 11-08-2011, 07:30 PM

[QUOTE=AmPat;455988]

Let us see what resident retard has for us.

Unlikely

,
Something about Sherlock.

,
Another asinine assumption and completely unfounded opinion by a liberal.

Wait! I thought the "retaliation" was Syria after a (fantasy) NATO attack? Would you please take your meds and re-do this mess?

I think he is saying that Israel would be the target.

There are a number of ways to attack a country, such as special ops people or even the CIA. I would not put it past the US to do so.