The pushback against Sharon Bialek begins...

[Rockntractor]

I'm not intimately familiar with them, no, but that's still not at issue here. Bill Clinton is not on trial here. This has to do with Herman Cain and this woman's allegations and, in particular, how credible she is. If this story is true about her getting fired before for making false claims about sexual harassment, then it goes a mighty long way in showing that she's not credible. Unlike the Left, though, I prefer to deal with some actual solid facts rather than just running around in a circle flailing my hands in the air screaming "he did it! he did it!"

Be specific in the first place rather than going after the messenger, this was like playing where's waldo.

[txradioguy]

I'm not intimately familiar with them, no, but that's still not at issue here. Bill Clinton is not on trial here. This has to do with Herman Cain and this woman's allegations and, in particular, how credible she is. If this story is true about her getting fired before for making false claims about sexual harassment, then it goes a mighty long way in showing that she's not credible. Unlike the Left, though, I prefer to deal with some actual solid facts rather than just running around in a circle flailing my hands in the air screaming "he did it! he did it!"

Psst...Adam


http://www.conservativeunderground.c...ad.php?t=45713

[Adam Wood]

Be specific in the first place rather than going after the messenger, this was like playing where's waldo.

I didn't "go after" anyone. I was quite specific from the start.

[Rockntractor]

If this doesn't squash Cain, they will pull another victim out of their hat and then another, proof or specifics will not matter, it is all about their narrative. Cain is to conservative for liberals to allow and apparently he makes many Republicans nervous as well.

[txradioguy]

If this doesn't squash Cain, they will pull another victim out of their hat and then another, proof or specifics will not matter, it is all about their narrative. Cain is to conservative for liberals to allow and apparently he makes many Republicans nervous as well.

Dems have had a narrative for decades that the "seriousness of the accusation" is more important than any actual crime.

Like with Justice Thomas...the fact that what Anita Hill accused him of was a lie doesn't matter to Dems...it's the accusation and how much mileage they can get out of it that counts.

[Rockntractor]

Dems have had a narrative for decades that the "seriousness of the accusation" is more important than any actual crime.

Like with Justice Thomas...the fact that what Anita Hill accused him of was a lie doesn't matter to Dems...it's the accusation and how much mileage they can get out of it that counts.

If you relentlessly repeat the lies and beat the names of the victims into the minds of the public, the damage is done. it isn't about facts or truth any longer, it is about numbers.

[marv]

If this story is true about her getting fired before for making false claims about sexual harassment, then it goes a mighty long way in showing that she's not credible. Unlike the Left, though, I prefer to deal with some actual solid facts rather than just running around in a circle flailing my hands in the air screaming "he did it! he did it!"

Circumstantial my dear Watson, circumstantial. Murderers have been convicted on circumstantial evidence. Now consider Bialek's documented history of legal and financial problems. Gold digger? Looks like a very real possibility here.

Companies pay token settlements to make cases go away to avoid the more expensive courtroom litigation route. Insurance companies do it all the time with claimants.

And women can also be predators when the "sexual harassment" checkbook is laid upon the table. Women also make passes at men. That's happened to me during several decades of working in mixed gender offices, although I looked at it as rather flattering.

[AmPat]

Where are the Wiener photos? Any Semen stained dresses? Any witnesses? Corroborating evidence?

Klintoon was innocent with the left even after the proof of his deviant actions, Cain is guilty in the complete absence of any proof.

[djones520]

Where are the Wiener photos? Any Semen stained dresses? Any witnesses? Corroborating evidence?

Klintoon was innocent with the left even after the proof of his deviant actions, Cain is guilty in the complete absence of any proof.

Why does it matter if he's guilty to the left or not. What should matter is if he is guilty, period.

I personally feel that he is innocent, but all this "deflection" to how the left reacts about this just makes it seem like we're trying to cover things up.

[CueSi]

"Why would she go to hear him speak a month ago at the Teacom convention? She went up and hugged Cain after the event."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ts-emerge.html

That's what makes my head scratch. I can't even be in the same ROOM as the cousin who molested me nearly 20 years later, much less run up for a hug.

~QC