|
|
It depends on how you define "social justice". I don't agree with the protests, if they were about social justice, they wouldn't be still going on. They wouldn't be making life difficult for the people who work in the areas around their protests and there are just so many other reasons why the OWS thing is wrong.
But I do believe that it is a Christian's responsibility to support justice, to treat people fairly, to give support to those who suffer injustices, and to bring injustices to the attention of the public so that they can be addressed.
Unfortunately, the left's response to religion (the "opiate of the masses") makes it unlikely that they will find many useful values in real churches. Don't get me wrong, they can find lots of liberation theologians and the like who iwll gladly pay lip service to religious principles, but the basic premise of Judeo-Christian philosophy is that the important things in life are not of this life, and that obsession with temporal issues blinds one to the truly spiritual.
So, if the immature idiot assaults a cop, then the cop who responds with force is an "insecure idiot with a badge trying to feel like a tough guy"? Sounds like a bit of your trademark moral equivalence there.
.
If we didn't know that you were an atheist, you might have convinced some of us that you meant this. Instead, we just get to shake our heads at your incredible cynicism and willingness to pander in order to advance the revolution.
We didn't really miss you, so much as notice that you hadn't been around for a while. It's like not noticing that the septic tank until the wind shifts.
The original Tea Partiers' superficial resemblance to the OWS movement isn't borne out by the facts. The OTPs didn't steal the tea, they destroyed it, and they didn't damage the ships or hold them longer than it took to accomplish the act. The reason for this is that in every colony except Massachusetts, tea consignees resigned or returned the tea to England. However, the Royal Governor of Massachussetts, Hutchinson, was the father of two tea importers/consignees, who stood to lose quite a bit if the tea were not off-loaded and sold. The tea ship Dartmouth arrived in the Boston Harbor in late November 1773. British law required the Dartmouth to unload and pay the duties within twenty days or customs officials could confiscate the cargo. The colonists urged the captain of the Dartmouth to go back without paying, but Governor Hutchinson refused to grant permission for the Dartmouth to leave without paying the duty. Two more tea ships arrived in Boston Harbor during the standoff. When the deadline passed, and the ship was still in the harbor, the colonists acted and destroyed the cargo, as you know, but they didn't abrogate all responsibility for their actions. Benjamin Franklin, speaking for the colonists, stated that the British East India company must be compensated for the loss of destroyed 90,000 lbs of tea (which, at two shillings per pound, comes to £9,000, or £888 thousand today). American merchants who attempted to reimburse the crown were rebuffed by Lord North. So, rather than an indiscrimate occupation of every piece of corporate property within their reach, the Boston Tea Party was a targeted, specific action which the colonists were prepared to make reparations for, having accomplished their original goals. When the Occupiers demonstrate that they are willing to clean up their messes, compensate the owners of the property that they have destroyed and otherwise take responsibility for their actions, then you can compare the two. As for other superficial similarities, these can be explained by the fact that indoor plumbing had not been introduced in the colonies at that time.
I stand in awe of your cynical manipulation of religious thought.
My father was a relentlessly self-improving boulangerie owner from Belgium with low grade narcolepsy and a penchant for buggery. My mother was a fifteen year old French prostitute named Chloe with webbed feet. My father would womanize, he would drink. He would make outrageous claims like he invented the question mark. Sometimes he would accuse chestnuts of being lazy. The sort of general malaise that only the genius possess and the insane lament. My childhood was typical. Summers in Rangoon, luge lessons. In the spring we’d make meat helmets. When I was insolent I was placed in a burlap bag and beaten with reeds- pretty standard really. At the age of twelve I received my first scribe. At the age of fourteen a Zoroastrian named Vilma ritualistically shaved my testicles. There really is nothing like a shorn scrotum… it’s breathtaking- I highly suggest you try it.
I am the 53%
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |