OWS Protesters Target School Children.

[Bailey]

Nope.



Actually, just the opposite.

Then explain why you posted it? There is no gray area in this situation, you either leave the kid alone or you don't.

[AmPat]

Nope.



Actually, just the opposite.

I doubt it. Most liberals when confronted by a real man resort to their favorite hate target; the police. They are Brave Sir Robins until faced with physical confrontation. I suspect you are no different.

[Odysseus]

What's your point? That we should allow the Occupistas to threaten children on their way to school? For that matter, do you have a point, besides being snarky?

Nope.

Then why don't you tell us what you are trying to say.

Actually, just the opposite.

Again, not clear. You are either calling everyone who objects to the activities in the article pussies, or you are saying that this proves that you aren't one. Neither is supported by the facts.

[AmPat]

What's your point? That we should allow the Occupistas to threaten children on their way to school? For that matter, do you have a point, besides being snarky?

Then why don't you tell us what you are trying to say.

Again, not clear. You are either calling everyone who objects to the activities in the article pussies, or you are saying that this proves that you aren't one. Neither is supported by the facts.

Give him plenty of time to come up with a quibbling explanation. He has to find a liberal manner to weasel out of his nasty remarks.

[Lanie]

If somebody followed my kids in the name of protest, I'd end up in jail for beating them within an inch of their life.

[Lanie]

What's your point? That we should allow the Occupistas to threaten children on their way to school? For that matter, do you have a point, besides being snarky?

Then why don't you tell us what you are trying to say.



Again, not clear. You are either calling everyone who objects to the activities in the article pussies, or you are saying that this proves that you aren't one. Neither is supported by the facts.

He's saying it's not okay to target children.

You know, just once, can you go by what a liberal actually says instead of trying to nail them to the ground for being a liberal?

[NJCardFan]

He's saying it's not okay to target children.

You know, just once, can you go by what a liberal actually says instead of trying to nail them to the ground for being a liberal?

No, he's being a snarky asshole.

[AmPat]

He's saying it's not okay to target children.

You know, just once, can you go by what a liberal actually says instead of trying to nail them to the ground for being a liberal?

Searching, searching,,, Nope, can't find the evidence.

[Lanie]

Searching, searching,,, Nope, can't find the evidence.

He posted a pic saying "Why can't anybody think about the children."

Somebody asked him if he was supportive of the protesters by posting that pic?

He said no, just the opposite.

Reading Comprehension classes. Try them sometime.

[AmPat]

He posted a pic saying "Why can't anybody think about the children."

Somebody asked him if he was supportive of the protesters by posting that pic?

He said no, just the opposite.

Reading Comprehension classes. Try them sometime.

I know what he said, it's the evidence of the cartoon that makes his words meaningless and a lie. Contextual clues, try them sometime.
For the record, here is what he actually said:

Quote:
Originally Posted by NJCardFan View Post
So by posting this you're saying that it's OK to attack children.
Nope.

He merely responded to the attack on children claim with his post. He then said this:

Quote:
This makes you a pussy.
Actually, just the opposite.

Attacking children is the subject to which he was labeled a "pussy." He responded to the label "pussy" by saying he was the opposite. I think he is calling himself a dick.

Hows that "comprehension" working out for you?