Thread: 93-Year-Old Tennessee Woman Who Cleaned State Capitol For 30 Years Denied Voter ID

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13
  1. #11  
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    15,318
    Guess this is all propaganda, eh Nova?
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124182750646102435.html
    And the outcome in which ACORN pleaded guilty:
    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...ration-scheme/

    This is just one example, of course but to say it's non-existent is laughable.
    "Inequality is a false notion propagated by those who are made to feel guilty for what they have by those who are jealous for what they don't"-Former MTV Host Kennedy
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    1,855
    She probably (Meaning just a guess) ended up in the line with a newly hired employee that saw an oportunity to make a big deal out of the new law. WSMV is run by left wing management, and most of their reporters are big left wingers also.
    It actually wouldn't surprise me if the drivers license clerk who told her that her old state ID failed to meet new voter ID regulations was a liberal with the whole point being to create a narrative that could be sold as "people are going to be disenfranchised......those horrid Republicans, blah, blah, blah...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    Fabulous Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    10,161
    Quote Originally Posted by NJCardFan View Post
    Guess this is all propaganda, eh Nova?
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124182750646102435.html
    And the outcome in which ACORN pleaded guilty:
    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...ration-scheme/

    This is just one example, of course but to say it's non-existent is laughable.
    I didn't say it was nonexistent, I said PROVEN CASES were ALMOST nonexistent.

    I don't buy into the whole liberal "If we know about X then we can speculate that the actual figure is 100X" thing. The next thing you know, someone is claiming that 100X is known and speculating that 1000X is the actuality. Surely you don't either.

    How exactly would showing a drivers license prevent dead people from voting anymore than it did dead people from stating their name and address? This kind of fraud is not done by thousands of people waiting in hundreds of lines, it's done inside the vote collection system, by handfuls of operatives before or after the polls close.

    I don't oppose the voter ID so take what you can get. Just don't expect me to buy into your bullshit just because I don't care if you want to require ID.

    Virginia requires that you state your name and your address, as it has for hundreds of years. Only one vote can be cast for that name with that address. To maintain that there is widespread fraud in that system is just silly. Whether using ID or identifying yourself by name and address, it's still one vote.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •