Look at how long it took for him to make a decision about more troops in Afghanistan.
THAT is the reasoning.
Obama had nothing to lose by supporting the Muslim Brotherhood rebellion in Libya. No U.S. lives at stake. Everything done on our part from the air and at great distances from any real danger. There was no political risk whatsoever. It was the perfect liberal war. The type they love to support where nothing can be pinned on them come election time and THEY think it bolsters them with us military types.He gave the order to overthrow Qadafi when there was nothing to be politically gained, and quite frankly he had a ton to lose on the call.
Yes...I think he would. It's the perfect political move the go "see...see why we need to move to green energy!".You think he'd just sit there and dither when Iran cut off 1/6th of the worlds oil supply?
It would allow him to accelerate his push to move to to "green" energy PLUS have the added advantage of picking up political points with his radical leftist base.
I could see him allowing it to happen very easily.
AmPat makes more sense on this than you do.You buy the bulk packages of tin foil at Sams Club don't you?
Last edited by txradioguy; 12-31-2011 at 04:04 AM.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|