|
|
But games is what are played in diplomacy and it doesn't matter which party is in office. Look at the childish routine we have employed with Cuba for decades. We "don't recognize their government" but we send it a rent check for Guantanamo, and they claim they don't cash it. A big deal is made about the new airline service from Florida to Cuba, but there has been a daily flight to and from Cuba for a long time now. Cuba doesn't have an embassy in Washington, but they have a piece of someone else's embassy. It's childish. It's like when TV couple aren't talking to each other and say, "Ask your mother to pass the ketchup."
I guess that makes him a moderate.
Those lines of communication are closing fast. The Brotherhood ran on a campaign promise to abrogate the peace treaty with Israel.
The Muslim Brotherhood doesn't run Egypt yet. The army does, and the degree of control that is ceded to the Brotherhood is very much up in the air. The army is, for the most part, pro-US (we trained their leadership), and is willing to maintain the status quo with Israel, while the Brothers are virulently anti-American and seek to engulf the Middle East in war. Kerry is meeting with a factional party that is diametrically opposed to us and lending them the legitimacy of contact with the head of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. In other words, he is boosting the standing of the Brotherhood within Egypt and internationally. Bush's meetings with sitting monarchs isn't the same thing as Kerry endorsing a domestic faction in Egyptian politics.
Agreed. We ought to have cut Cuba off completely and put all of our resources behind the opposition when the Soviet Union collapsed. The thought of Castro dying peacefully in bed, unlike so many of his victims, is disgusting.
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |