Results 1 to 6 of 6

Hybrid View

  1. #1 Best Nadin thread evah... 
    eeeevil Sith Admin SarasotaRepub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Sunny,FL
    Posts
    43,285
    Surely a Classic of Pitt Proportions!!!


    Nadine's apology is sent thru the wringer as it deserves.

    Best post, and therefore Hidden by Jury is:

    Obamanaut
    24. One would hope that a trained historian, self proclaimed reporter, writer, gamer, editor,

    View profile
    (imagined) expert on all things nuclear (including milk), reader of scripts, translator of trends, connector of dots, photographer (when the batteries in the good rig are charged), rock climber, and wearer of so many other hats the mind boggles - would have known to check some sources before chewing on one's own foot.

    But what is a 'posser'? "...As to Jay, or whoever he is...possers are..."

    May the FORCE be with you!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,720
    myrna minx
    4. Could you provide a little back story? Is there a link to a previous thread?

    Thanks.
    greytdemocrat
    11. Good Lord...

    Please don't encourage her anymore on this.
    AAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAAA!!!!!
    Olde-style, states' rights conservative. Ask if this concept confuses you.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,720
    Oh shit, this is hilarious!

    Kaleko
    46. Piling on after somebody is targeted for serial bullying and gloating...

    Last edited Tue Feb 7, 2012, 04:17 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

    is that what your rofl smilie is all about?

    Btw. I was juror # 1 on for that post.
    __________________________________________________ ________________
    At Tue Feb 7, 2012, 03:30 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

    One would hope that a trained historian, self proclaimed reporter, writer, gamer, editor,

    REASON FOR ALERT:

    This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)

    ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

    This is an outright attack. Although the OP and the thread involve matter that is "relevant" to the alerted post, I don't think you can have a much clearer "personal attack" than what we have here. The whole post is wrong, but if you have any doubts, the use of "imagined," should settle the issue.

    JURY RESULTS

    You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Feb 7, 2012, 03:53 PM, and the Jury voted 5-1 to HIDE IT.

    Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: Borderline case. But it does imply that Nadin is lying or delusional, so I voted to hide these slurs.

    Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: Piling on isn't necessary the OP is already admitting a fault in the story.

    Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: It is an over-the-top comment. The intent was to mock and humiliate.

    Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Although the button I pushed is "post is okay," the post is not okay. But it's really not in my purview to enforce manners on someone. An apology has been proffered with appropriate humility, and some folks simply can't accept "you were right" for an answer. This post reflects far more poorly on the poster than on the person who started the thread, and savvy DUers can discern the difference.

    Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: I'd actually recommend you hide the entire thread (I read all of it for context). Its clearly a call-back OP related to a prior thread which must have became a mess. Here, the OP could have just simply said ... "my mistake" ... but the OP also seems to be making some excuses, and diverting some, and even seems to leave the door open that there might be something more nefarious going on. And that, I think that invites some who felt misled in the prior thread to feel the need to come back and respond with an "I told you so" style. This particular post was a little over the top, although I think that was its point ... if one is "over the top" in their initial position, only to be wrong, they have farther to fall. Still, the entire thread serves no constructive purpose whatsoever.

    Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation necessary, just read the post.
    __________________________________________________ ______________________________
    Olde-style, states' rights conservative. Ask if this concept confuses you.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    CU Royalty JB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    8,072
    phew. It's hard being on DU these days.

    I miss the good old days of just basic 24 business hour bullshit and chicken wire 9/11.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member Apache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Tree rats are watching you
    Posts
    7,044
    So the Mexican-Polock gets called on her lies,and they hide it.... How PC of them...
    Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem.
    Ronald Reagan

    We could say they are spending like drunken sailors. That would be unfair to drunken sailors, they're spending their OWN money.
    Ronald Reagan

    R.I.P. Crockspot
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member Dan D. Doty's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Pevely, Missouri
    Posts
    2,974
    Someone calling crazy Nadin :eek::eek::eek:

    With the likes of UGP, MoPaul, Fister, PlaidAdder and Will Pitt haunting DU, it was like someone with leprosy
    being critical about someone else with a pimple.

    CU's Paranormal Expert.


    Keep your powder dry, your sword sharp and your wits intact.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •