Thread: Democratic Women Boycott House Contraception Hearing After Republicans Prevent Women

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1 Democratic Women Boycott House Contraception Hearing After Republicans Prevent Women 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    1,854
    Well, if you haven't heard, the liberals are all outraged that the Catholic Bishops and Conservatives would dare to demand that the Constitution be followed when they want and demand that contraceptives, including those that induce abortions be provided by every business and entity out there.

    http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002318755
    Star Member boston bean (12,020 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

    View profile

    Democratic Women Boycott House Contraception Hearing After Republicans Prevent Women From Testifying
    This morning, Democrats tore into House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) for preventing women from testifying before a hearing examining the Obama administrationís new regulation requiring employers and insurers to provide contraception coverage to their employees. Republicans oppose the administrationís rule and have sponsored legislation that would allow employers to limit the availability of birth control to women.

    Ranking committee member Elijah Cummings (D-MD) had asked Issa to include a female witness at the hearing, but the Chairman refused, arguing that ďAs the hearing is not about reproductive rights and contraception but instead about the Administrationís actions as they relate to freedom of religion and conscience, he believes that Ms. Fluke is not an appropriate witness.Ē


    http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012...om-testifying/
    Star Member tabatha (17,527 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
    1. Prevent women from testifying?

    Are they now the Taliban?
    Star Member boston bean (12,020 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
    2. It's a full frontal assault we are seeing.

    Some are damned determined to bring us back to the 50's.
    Star Member tabatha (17,527 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
    6. Al Sharpton relayed someone who said

    that it is equivalent to talking about a group of mice and inviting a board of cats to make the decision.
    Star Member RC (17,250 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
    3. Good. Maybe Issa's action have stirred up enough anger to put an end to

    the discrimination against women.
    This is first and foremost a Civil Rights issue, no different in reality that discrimination against the Gay and Lesbian culture, people of color or any other group with less than full Constitutional Rights, because of bad law.
    In fact it is the same people and institutions behind all the enforced discrimination.
    Of course, the REAL story is that the hearing was to discuss the constitutionality of the decision that Obama has made and is forcing on all businesses, including religious institutions that are morally opposed to it. The Democrats are all fired up because they want a WOMAN to testify. So do they find a woman who can argue that it is within the Constitution?

    No.

    They find a law student who can moan and cry about how unfair it is because college students have to pay for contraceptives and it is shameful and unfair to make them pay. All emotion, no facts about whether the mandate is constitutional or not.

    You can watch what this student planned to say here:

    http://www.democraticunderground.com/101712356

    In the next thread they also expose that they aren't concerned about the constitutionality of it if it's something they want. They also expose that if it helps Obama then they are A OK with it as well.

    http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002318589


    Star Member MineralMan (40,578 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

    President Obama is showing considerable genius

    Last edited Thu Feb 16, 2012, 02:44 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
    right now. By raising the whole contraception issue through requiring coverage, he has more or less forced the Republicans to take a negative stance on contraception. Since the voting booth is not the confessional, women will respond by voting for what they know makes sense, regardless of party or religious affiliation. Contraception knows no political or religious boundaries, either. It's been many decades since women allowed themselves to be continuous baby machines. That's demonstrated by the current birth rate in the US. One figure has 70% of Catholic women using contraception at some point in their lives.

    The Republican men seem to not realize this, just as they don't seem to realize so many things. Polls are already showing the result of this move by Obama. I think other moves are coming up soon that will also force the Republican candidates to take positions that go against their own voters. I'm not sure which issues those will be, but the genius shown in the contraceptive issue should produce other effective issue-oriented moves that will confound the Republican by blind-siding them.

    Congressional and senatorial candidates need to pay close attention to what is happening and bring these issues to their own districts and states and push their Republican opponents into untenable opposition to popular issues. There's a bright band of sunlight forming on the horizon, I think. The sun is about to come up.
    Liberals need to be reminded that if this is OK with them-breaking down the barrier to the separation between the church and state then the next Republican President can mandate that all public schools teach 2 hours of bible each week from federally prepared materials.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member Apache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Tree rats are watching you
    Posts
    6,715
    Gee how'd I guess that the story would be twisted... With a name like Think Progress there wouldn't be any bias


    Why do they feel there is such a need to outright LIE? I mean most of America is behind them.... right??
    Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem.
    Ronald Reagan

    We could say they are spending like drunken sailors. That would be unfair to drunken sailors, they're spending their OWN money.
    Ronald Reagan

    R.I.P. Crockspot
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member Arroyo_Doble's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Ft Worth
    Posts
    3,787
    The constitutional question on religious freedom being a defense for not following the law was resolved awhile back. The Amish pay Social Security taxes and peyote is illegal for Animists as well as hippies.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Power CUer FlaGator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Swamps of N. Florida
    Posts
    22,172
    Quote Originally Posted by Arroyo_Doble View Post
    The constitutional question on religious freedom being a defense for not following the law was resolved awhile back. The Amish pay Social Security taxes and peyote is illegal for Animists as well as hippies.
    There is no law that states that contraception must be supplied freely by an insurance company.

    The question being debated is not the constitutionality of distributing contraceptives, it is can a religion be forced to so something that violates its principles when to not do so does not break a law, just a mandate issued by an unelected government bureaucracy.

    Once again a false dichotomy.

    I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.
    C. S. Lewis
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    15,314
    Um, anyone can freely walk into any drug store and buy condoms. What's the problem?
    "Inequality is a false notion propagated by those who are made to feel guilty for what they have by those who are jealous for what they don't"-Former MTV Host Kennedy
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Fabulous Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    10,161
    Quote Originally Posted by FlaGator View Post
    There is no law that states that contraception must be supplied freely by an insurance company.

    The question being debated is not the constitutionality of distributing contraceptives, it is can a religion be forced to so something that violates its principles when to not do so does not break a law, just a mandate issued by an unelected government bureaucracy.

    Once again a false dichotomy.
    Do not kneel and kiss the ring nor engage in any other popery and treason, American.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Power CUer noonwitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Warren, MI
    Posts
    11,865
    It figures that the house leadership would leave women out of the process.


    The pill is more than just a contraceptive. It is used to treat excessively painful menstruation or to regulate a woman's cycle if she has drastically irratic periods. Most women could tell the panel that.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member Arroyo_Doble's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Ft Worth
    Posts
    3,787
    Quote Originally Posted by FlaGator View Post
    There is no law that states that contraception must be supplied freely by an insurance company.
    There is now.

    The question being debated is not the constitutionality of distributing contraceptives, it is can a religion be forced to so something that violates its principles when to not do so does not break a law, just a mandate issued by an unelected government bureaucracy.

    Once again a false dichotomy.
    They would be breaking the law.

    But again, like the Amish in 1982, religious freedom is not an out.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,553
    Quote Originally Posted by noonwitch View Post
    It figures that the house leadership would leave women out of the process.


    The pill is more than just a contraceptive. It is used to treat excessively painful menstruation or to regulate a woman's cycle if she has drastically irratic periods. Most women could tell the panel that.
    And most health plans cover the Pill for those uses. Even the Catholic ones.
    Olde-style, states' rights conservative. Ask if this concept confuses you.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Power CUer FlaGator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Swamps of N. Florida
    Posts
    22,172
    Quote Originally Posted by Novaheart View Post
    Do not kneel and kiss the ring nor engage in any other popery and treason, American.
    I don't think I understand what you are trying to say here.

    I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.
    C. S. Lewis
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •