Entertainment Earth

Thread: Santorum: I'll cut $5 Trillion in 5 years

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 25
  1. #11  
    Senior Member Arroyo_Doble's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Ft Worth
    Posts
    3,479
    Quote Originally Posted by Madisonian View Post
    Every politician says basically the same thing. The problem is that their timeline always seems to start in the middle of their hopefully second term or 10 years out.
    Notice he did not say when he would start the cutting and I'd like to know how since the President does not have a line item veto and it is the House and Senate responsible for sending the budget to the President.

    I don't see the Quaker Statist having the cajones to shut down the Federal government to get what he wants if the House or Senate are not solidly Republican.
    But isn't that the presidential schtick during the campaign?

    "I will do X ... I will do Y .... I will do your mother .... blah blah blah."

    They really are limited in what they can accomplish even with the Legislative Branch held by their party.
     

  2. #12  
    Senior Member Molon Labe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Jihad Me At Hello
    Posts
    4,548
    Quote Originally Posted by Zathras View Post
    He's going to cut the budget by 5 trillion within 5 years.

    He'll cut 1 trillion a year from the budget for 5 years.

    Therefore he's cut 5 trillion within 5 years.

    See how easy that was.
    right...cut 1 trillion over 5 years......when the budget is 3.7 trillion. I get it.

    Since there will BE no federal government if that happens, he will be the greatest conservative Ev'ah.

    We will actually be getting change back.
    Gun Control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound - Unknown


    The problem is Empty People, Not Loaded Guns - Linda Schrock Taylor
     

  3. #13  
    Senior Member Madisonian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Peoples Democratic Socialist Republic of Michiganistanovia
    Posts
    2,315
    I'm not great at politimath, so lets see how this works out...

    Starting with 2013 for example
    2013 - 3.7 trillion - 1 trillion = 2.7 trillion
    2014 - 2.7 trillion - 1 trillion = 1.7 trillion
    2015 - 1.7 trillion - 1 trillion = 0.7 trillion
    2016 - 0.7 trillion - 1 trillion = -0.3 trillion
    2017 - -0.3 trillion - 1 trillion = -1.3 trillion

    Of course the more likely scenario will be
    2012 was 3.7 trillion so for 2013 Congress requests 5 trillion, Santorum stalls for 4 trillion, 1 trillion cut
    2013 was 4 trillion so for 2014 Congress requests 6 trillion, Santorum stalls for 5 trillion, another trillion cut
    and so on and so on.

    Remember that in the Potomac Swamp, a decrease in the projected increase is a cut even if you spend more than the previous year.
     

  4. #14  
    Senior Ape Articulate_Ape's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    NJ, Exit Only
    Posts
    7,737
    Quote Originally Posted by Molon Labe View Post
    Ok....Santy said during the debate last night and on several other occassions he's going to cut 5 trillion dollars from the federal budget in 5 years.

    The Federal budget in 2012 was $3.7 trillion.

    Why isn't anyone calling this guy out on this baloney?


    from his own website:
    For the sake of fairness to the man, I think $5 trillion over 5 years is $1 trillion/year. I'm just sayin'.
    When the delegates emerged from the Constitutional Convention in 1787, a Mrs. Powel of Philadelphia asked Benjamin Franklin, “Well, Doctor, what have we got?” Franklin replied, “A republic, madam, if you can keep it.”
     

  5. #15  
    Senior Ape Articulate_Ape's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    NJ, Exit Only
    Posts
    7,737
    Quote Originally Posted by Madisonian View Post
    I'm not great at politimath, so lets see how this works out...

    Starting with 2013 for example
    2013 - 3.7 trillion - 1 trillion = 2.7 trillion
    2014 - 2.7 trillion - 1 trillion = 1.7 trillion
    2015 - 1.7 trillion - 1 trillion = 0.7 trillion
    2016 - 0.7 trillion - 1 trillion = -0.3 trillion
    2017 - -0.3 trillion - 1 trillion = -1.3 trillion

    Of course the more likely scenario will be
    2012 was 3.7 trillion so for 2013 Congress requests 5 trillion, Santorum stalls for 4 trillion, 1 trillion cut
    2013 was 4 trillion so for 2014 Congress requests 6 trillion, Santorum stalls for 5 trillion, another trillion cut
    and so on and so on.

    Remember that in the Potomac Swamp, a decrease in the projected increase is a cut even if you spend more than the previous year.
    Oh, that's right, just go ahead and steal my thunder. Maybe you'd like a side of lightning with that, you bastard!
    When the delegates emerged from the Constitutional Convention in 1787, a Mrs. Powel of Philadelphia asked Benjamin Franklin, “Well, Doctor, what have we got?” Franklin replied, “A republic, madam, if you can keep it.”
     

  6. #16  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Woodland Park, Colorado, United States
    Posts
    8,560
    Quote Originally Posted by Molon Labe View Post
    I actually enjoyed it very much last night when Romney called out Santorum for actively campaigning for and supporting Sen. Arlen Specter.

    You know... the RINO conservative who became a Democrat and cast the deciding vote for Obama care.

    So the fact that this guy makes you so hot in the loins is probably why you don't care that you can't cut 5 trillion from 3.7.
    Weak. Seriously, that's all you have?
    I wonder if maybe Santorum might have been suggesting cutting 5 trillion of unfunded liability as well as doing something about that budget that we haven't had for over a thousand days? But by all means, O Blah Blah is better. Try blowing your favorite candidate, O Blah Blah, outright instead of attacking the GOP candidates. It's more honest.
    Education without values, as useful as it is, seems rather to make man a more clever devil.
    C. S. Lewis
    Do not ever say that the desire to "do good" by force is a good motive. Neither power-lust nor stupidity are good motives. (Are you listening Barry)?:mad:
    Ayn Rand
     

  7. #17  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Woodland Park, Colorado, United States
    Posts
    8,560
    Quote Originally Posted by Molon Labe View Post
    right...cut 1 trillion over 5 years......when the budget is 3.7 trillion. I get it.

    Since there will BE no federal government if that happens, he will be the greatest conservative Ev'ah.

    We will actually be getting change back.
    Good, then the bastards can't steal from the taxpayers anymore. By the way, how's Barry doing for you? Did you like the way he turned the White House into a jazz club? Classy guy that Chicago Thug. Now for his next trick, he's going to fool the fools into thinking he's presidential material.
    Education without values, as useful as it is, seems rather to make man a more clever devil.
    C. S. Lewis
    Do not ever say that the desire to "do good" by force is a good motive. Neither power-lust nor stupidity are good motives. (Are you listening Barry)?:mad:
    Ayn Rand
     

  8. #18  
    PORCUS SUPRMODERATUS Rockntractor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    36,706
    Quote Originally Posted by Molon Labe View Post
    Probably? That's not what he said. Next you'll tell me he's going to give me a Pony.
    http://i686.photobucket.com/albums/vv230/upyourstruly/HTDcl.jpg?t=1290787788
    How is obama working out for you?
     

  9. #19  
    Best Bounty Hunter in the Forums fettpett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Southwest Michigan (in Exile)
    Posts
    8,757
    Quote Originally Posted by Madisonian View Post
    I'm not great at politimath, so lets see how this works out...

    Starting with 2013 for example
    2013 - 3.7 trillion - 1 trillion = 2.7 trillion
    2014 - 2.7 trillion - 1 trillion = 1.7 trillion
    2015 - 1.7 trillion - 1 trillion = 0.7 trillion
    2016 - 0.7 trillion - 1 trillion = -0.3 trillion
    2017 - -0.3 trillion - 1 trillion = -1.3 trillion

    Of course the more likely scenario will be
    2012 was 3.7 trillion so for 2013 Congress requests 5 trillion, Santorum stalls for 4 trillion, 1 trillion cut
    2013 was 4 trillion so for 2014 Congress requests 6 trillion, Santorum stalls for 5 trillion, another trillion cut
    and so on and so on.

    Remember that in the Potomac Swamp, a decrease in the projected increase is a cut even if you spend more than the previous year.
    what budget? there hasn't been a budget since this asshole took office. going on 4 years. between expenditures and debt the Government owes/spends 15 trillion dollars, more than the GDP for the first time ever. cut 5 Trillion out and you're looking at 10 trillion in debt and expenditures.
    "Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings..." Patrick Henry
     

  10. #20  
    LTC Member Odysseus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    FT Belvoir, VA
    Posts
    13,791
    Quote Originally Posted by Molon Labe View Post
    Ok....Santy said during the debate last night and on several other occassions he's going to cut 5 trillion dollars from the federal budget in 5 years.

    The Federal budget in 2012 was $3.7 trillion.

    Why isn't anyone calling this guy out on this baloney?


    from his own website:
    Quote Originally Posted by Arroyo_Doble View Post
    I took it to mean over five years.
    Exactly. Budgeting is done in five year increments. What I assumed that Santorum meant is that he was going to reduce the expenditures over the next POM (Program Objective Memorandum) cycle by $5 Trillion.
    --Odysseus
    Sic Hacer Pace, Para Bellum.

    Before you can do things for people, you must be the kind of man who can get things done. But to get things done, you must love the doing, not the people!
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •