#1 Records show McCain more bipartisan09-15-2008, 05:36 PM
Records show McCain more bipartisan
Stephen Dinan (Contact)
Monday, September 15, 2008
Sen. John McCain's record of working with Democrats easily outstrips Sen. Barack Obama's efforts with Republicans, according to an analysis by The Washington Times of their legislative records.
Whether looking at bills they have led on or bills they have signed onto, Mr. McCain has reached across the aisle far more frequently and with more members than Mr. Obama since the latter came to the Senate in 2005.
In fact, by several measures, Mr. McCain has been more likely to team up with Democrats than with members of his own party. Democrats made up 55 percent of his political partners over the last two Congresses, including on the tough issues of campaign finance and global warming. For Mr. Obama, Republicans were only 13 percent of his co-sponsors during his time in the Senate, and he had his biggest bipartisan successes on noncontroversial measures, such as issuing a postage stamp in honor of civil rights icon Rosa Parks.
With calls for change in Washington dominating the campaign, both Mr. Obama, the Democrats' presidential nominee, and Mr. McCain, his Republican opponent, have claimed the mantle of bipartisanship. But since 2005, Mr. McCain has led as chief sponsor of 82 bills, on which he had 120 Democratic co-sponsors out of 220 total, for an average of 55 percent. He worked with Democrats on 50 of his bills, and of those, 37 times Democrats outnumber Republicans as co-sponsors.
I know more than a couple liberals (IRL) who've told me this is their main reason for supporting John McCain.“Some day you will be old enough to start reading fairy tales again.”
― C.S. Lewis
09-15-2008, 10:05 PM
How shocking. McCain who has a history of working across the isle - and Palin with a history of working across the isle are more bipartisan than the number 1 and number 3 most liberal senators in Washington??? I never would have thunk it! ;)Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|