Thread: Britain Adopts Islamic Law, Gives Sharia Courts Full Power to Rule on Civil Cases

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26
  1. #1 Britain Adopts Islamic Law, Gives Sharia Courts Full Power to Rule on Civil Cases 
    Senior Member AlmostThere's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    A Great Red State
    Posts
    1,920
    Great Britain has surrendered.

    Islamic law has been officially adopted in Britain, with sharia courts given powers to rule on Muslim civil cases.

    The government has quietly sanctioned the powers for sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence.

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,422661,00.html

    Sharia courts deciding matters of domestic violence??
    Better to die on your feet than live on your knees.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Britan adopts sharia law: welcome to Londonistan. 
    Resident Grump
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    7,767
    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle4749183.ece

    Revealed: UK’s first official sharia courts
    Abul Taher

    ISLAMIC law has been officially adopted in Britain, with sharia courts given powers to rule on Muslim civil cases The government has quietly sanctioned the powers for sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence.
    Yeah right...allowing Muslims to rule on domestic violence is like making Hannibal Lecter the Minster for Food.

    Rulings issued by a network of five sharia courts are enforceable with the full power of the judicial system, through the county courts or High Court. Previously, the rulings of sharia courts in Britain could not be enforced, and depended on voluntary compliance among Muslims.
    You won't see that here. When does Britain start paying jizya?

    It has now emerged that sharia courts with these powers have been set up in London, Birmingham, Bradford and Manchester with the network’s headquarters in Nuneaton, Warwickshire. Two more courts are being planned for Glasgow and Edinburgh.

    Sheikh Faiz-ul-Aqtab Siddiqi, whose Muslim Arbitration Tribunal runs the courts, said he had taken advantage of a clause in the Arbitration Act 1996. Under the act, the sharia courts are classified as arbitration tribunals. The rulings of arbitration tribunals are binding in law, provided that both parties in the dispute agree to give it the power to rule on their case.
    Alas poor England, we knew ye well.

    Siddiqi said: “We realised that under the Arbitration Act we can make rulings which can be enforced by county and high courts. The act allows disputes to be resolved using alternatives like tribunals. This method is called alternative dispute resolution, which for Muslims is what the sharia courts are.”
    Wonder when they will start the stonings?

    The disclosure that Muslim courts have legal powers in Britain comes seven months after Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury, was pilloried for suggesting that the establishment of sharia in the future “seems unavoidable” in Britain. In July, the head of the judiciary, the lord chief justice, Lord Phillips, further stoked controversy when he said that sharia could be used to settle marital and financial disputes.
    The word you are looking for is dhimmitude.

    In fact, Muslim tribunal courts started passing sharia judgments in August 2007. They have dealt with more than 100 cases that range from Muslim divorce and inheritance to nuisance neighbours. It has also emerged that tribunal courts have settled six cases of domestic violence between married couples, working in tandem with the police investigations.
    How many lashes did the woman get for complaining when her husband beat the living shit out of her?

    Siddiqi said he expected the courts to handle a greater number of “smaller” criminal cases in coming years as more Muslim clients approach them. “All we are doing is regulating community affairs in these cases,” said Siddiqi, chairman of the governing council of the tribunal.

    Isn't that what the POLICE are for?

    Jewish Beth Din courts operate under the same provision in the Arbitration Act and resolve civil cases, ranging from divorce to business disputes. They have existed in Britain for more than 100 years, and previously operated under a precursor to the act.Politicians and church leaders expressed concerns that this could mark the beginnings of a “parallel legal system” based on sharia for some British Muslims.

    Last time I checked, Jewish courts didnt imprison a woman for the crime of being raped
    .

    Dominic Grieve, the shadow home secretary, said: “If it is true that these tribunals are passing binding decisions in the areas of family and criminal law, I would like to know which courts are enforcing them because I would consider such action unlawful. British law is absolute and must remain so.” Douglas Murray, the director of the Centre for Social Cohesion, said: “I think it’s appalling. I don’t think arbitration that is done by sharia should ever be endorsed or enforced by the British state.”

    NO SHIT, SHERLOCK


    There are concerns that women who agree to go to tribunal courts are getting worse deals because Islamic law favours men. Siddiqi said that in a recent inheritance dispute handled by the court in Nuneaton, the estate of a Midlands man was divided between three daughters and two sons.
    Gee..I wonder why that would be.....

    The judges on the panel gave the sons twice as much as the daughters, in accordance with sharia. Had the family gone to a normal British court, the daughters would have got equal amounts.
    Shock..horror...surprise...

    In the six cases of domestic violence, Siddiqi said the judges ordered the husbands to take anger management classes and mentoring from community elders. There was no further punishment. In each case, the women subsequently withdrew the complaints they had lodged with the police and the police stopped their investigations.

    Res ipsa loquitur.


    Siddiqi said that in the domestic violence cases, the advantage was that marriages were saved and couples given a second chance.
    Yeah, now they beat them where it doesnt show and they know that if they complain, they die.

    Inayat Bunglawala, assistant secretary-general of the Muslim Council of Britain, said: “The MCB supports these tribunals. If the Jewish courts are allowed to flourish, so must the sharia ones.”

    Additional reporting: Helen Brooks

    Funny..as I seem to recall, Britain already has courts. Or do they now bow to Mecca as well?
    Last edited by Sonnabend; 09-15-2008 at 07:03 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Super Moderator bijou's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,193
    Merged ....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Power CUer FlaGator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Swamps of N. Florida
    Posts
    22,174
    Quote Originally Posted by bijou View Post
    Merged ....
    There is much irony in that comment!

    I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.
    C. S. Lewis
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    a bunch of damned idiots. Get out of Britian while you can if you like freedom.
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    LTC Member Odysseus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    FT Belvoir, VA
    Posts
    15,639
    Quote Originally Posted by PoliCon View Post
    a bunch of damned idiots. Get out of Britian while you can if you like freedom.
    The British have no idea what they've done. When legal issues arise between Moslems and non-Moslems, the Moslems will claim that they are only subject to Islamic law, and therefore any cases involving them must go to the Sharia courts, where the testimony of an infidel is inadmissable, so there will be no recourse for contractual disputes or torts between Moslems and Brits, at least for the Brits. Eventually, the Sharia courts will demand control of criminal procedings as well, but first, they will claim jurisdiction over all cases involving Moslems, whether they like it or not. The worst impact will be on moderate Moslems, who sought to leave that insanity behind them in the Middle East. A Moslem who tries to have a case heard in a British court will be accused of apostasy, which puts his or her life at risk, since any good Moslem would allow the case to go before the Sharia court. That's why the daughters consented to allow a Sharia court to hear their inheritance case. Had they refused, they'd have singled themselves out for retribution for denying Islam, which carries a death sentence. Far safer to settle for half an inheritance than be murdered for denying the prophet.

    The British have given themselves over to their enemies, but first they have betrayed those Moslems who had hoped to become British.
    --Odysseus
    Sic Hacer Pace, Para Bellum.

    Before you can do things for people, you must be the kind of man who can get things done. But to get things done, you must love the doing, not the people!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member AlmostThere's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    A Great Red State
    Posts
    1,920
    I wasn't trying to be melodramatic. Great Britain has indeed surrendered and radical Islam will take possession of Britain in the courtroom.
    Better to die on your feet than live on your knees.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Go 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Central Coast Ca.
    Posts
    129
    I thought they had, or tried to have, this in parts of Canada?
    I have also never heard of a Jewish court.
    ________
    Washington Medical Marijuana Dispensaries
    Last edited by Scarlet; 04-18-2011 at 06:38 AM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Quote Originally Posted by PoliCon View Post
    a bunch of damned idiots. Get out of Britian while you can if you like freedom.
    Everyone I know in Britain is trying to escape. Our country has been ruined by liberals and the European Union :mad:
    Find out what is really happening in Europe: what the European leaders don't want you to read

    http://www.free-europe.org/blog/english.php

    I support victims rights

    http://www.prodeathpenalty.com/
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Super Moderator bijou's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,193
    Quote Originally Posted by Scarlet View Post
    I thought they had, or tried to have, this in parts of Canada?
    I have also never heard of a Jewish court.
    Jewish life in England goes back almost 1000 years. It is believed that the first Jews were brought over from Normandy by William the Conqueror in 1066; there is reference to Jews in Oxford as early as 1075 and the Domesday Book of 1086 records the Jew Mennasseh owning land in Oxfordshire.

    Several Baalei Tosafot (commentators) lived in England including R.Yaakov MiOrleans, (martyred in London at the coronation of Richard the Lionheart in 1189), R. YomTov MiYoigny, author of Omnam Kein recited on Yom Kippur Maariv (martyred in the York massacre of 1190) and the R'i MiLondri, mentioned in the Remo in Hilchot Pesach (Siman 473 Sif 76 ) as recommending the recitation of the Hagadah in the vernacular.

    In 1290, however, Jewish life in England came to abrupt end when the Edict of Expulsion was proclaimed by King Edward I, resulting in the banishment of the entire Jewish Population from Britain. The Edict was issued on 18th July, which that year was the Fast of Tisha B'Av.

    1656 - The Resettlement

    England remained "Yudenrein" until 1656 when R. Menashe Ben Israel successfully petitioned Oliver Cromwell to allow the readmission of Jews. It is said that Menashe Ben Israel pressed Oliver Cromwell on the grounds that England -Angleterre- was one of the four "angles" of the earth referred to in the prophecies of the ingathering of the exiles, and thus resettlement would hasten the coming of the Messiah!

    Within only 50 years the offices of the Chief Rabbi and the London Beth Din came into being to provide central religious authority for Jewish communities in London and throughout the United Kingdom - a role reflected in the London Beth Din's official title "D'Kehila Kedosha London Bet Din Vehamedina" - The Beth Din of London and the Country. This national role has become increasingly important in recent years with the decline of Jewish communities and local Batei Din in Britain.

    Among the early Chief Rabbis who helped establish the central Orthodox authority for which the UK is renowned was R. Dovid Tevele Schiff (Chief Rabbi 1765-1791), whose explanations on the Mishna, Lashon Hazahav, is printed in the Yachin Uboaz Mishnayot, and R. Nosson Adler (Chief Rabbi 1845-1890) author of the famous commentary on the Targum Nesina LaGer.

    HaRav Yechezkel Abramsky

    In 1934 the prestige of the London Beth Din as a world ranking halachic authority was greatly enhanced with the appointment of the Gaon HaRav Yechezkel Abramsky (the Chazon Yecheskel) as Rosh Beth Din. Although other renowned Talmidei Chachamim served both during and since his time - such as Dayan Arieh Leib Grosnass (Lev Aryeh) and Dayan Rapaport (Be'er Avroham), it was Dayan Abramsky above all who established the policies and customs that are followed by the London Beth Din to this day.

    Av Beth Din , Rosh Beth Din and Senior Dayan

    Since 1984, the Rosh Beth Din has been Dayan Chanoch HaCohen Ehrentreu ,formerly Rosh Beth Din and Communal Rabbi of Manchester, and previously Rosh Kollel Sunderland. Dayan Ehrentreu retires from the Beth Din in January 2007 and will retain his links as a Consultant to the Beth Din. Serving together with him is Dayan Menachem Gelley (son of R. Zacharia Gelley of Washington Heights), who will become the Senior Dayan in January 2007, Dayan Yonason Abraham, Dayan Ivan Binstock and Dayan Shmuel Simons. The title of Av Beth Din is formally held by the Chief Rabbi Sir Jonathan Sacks, whose high profile as an international religious leader and author and lecturer of renown has done so much to enhance the stature of Orthodoxy both nationally and internationally. By dint of his extensive workload as well as convention of his office, the Chief Rabbi is not generally personally involved in day to day Beth Din work, but remains in constant contact with the Dayanim.


    The activities of the London Beth Din encompass all aspects of London Beth Din work including Dinei Torah (court cases), Gittin (divorces), Geirut (conversions), Shechita (Jewish slaughter), Kashrut, personal status, and all the trials and tribulations of major community life. The central authority of the London Beth Din is such that by convention neither the Kedassia, Manchester, nor Sephardi Batei Din carry out Geirut in the UK and virtually all authority in this critical area is delegated to the London Beth Din.

    United Synagogue

    The London Beth Din is a major department of the United Synagogue, the main Orthodox synagogue grouping in Britain, which was established by Act of Parliament in 1870. The United Synagogue has over 60 communities throughout London and encompasses the full spectrum of Orthodox community facilities including schools, Chadarim, Mikvaot (ritual baths), Chevra Kadisha (burial society), Batei Olam (cemetries) and Tribe (The Young United Syangogue).
    http://www.theus.org.uk/the_united_s..._din/about_us/
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •