It seems like you are shifting now, saying that everyone targets everyone, so it's impossible to define the "white male vote" vs the "minority vote" vs the "woman vote", ect. if everyone targets everyone ,then every vote is a vote for all of these groups. In that case, it's meaningless to even make the distinction.
However, since the distinction was obviously made, then it must mean that there is actually some difference here with regards to which groups are targeted by which candidates/parties.
If that's too verbose, I'm saying "don't dive into wishy-washy ambiguity. just be real. which vote is the "minority vote", which vote is the "white guilt vote" and which vote is the "white male vote"?
Do I need to give you examples of each demographic and how each party targets them??
Fantasy world, wee? Am I dreaming Sharpton and Jackson poking the caged dog with a stick in Florida? And I suppose I misunderstood Jackson's comment that "blacks are under attack"(take a look at a black man's take on that comment)? If that isn't a call to arms I don't know what is. And then the Black Panthers get involved which can't be good. These race pimps are trying to electrify their black base and it's all going to culminate with blacks rioting all over the country if Obama loses in November. Wait and listen to the rhetoric especially if the polls show Obama losing. Mark my words, you want to talk code words, wait until you hear the bullshit flying come September. And what do I think the outcome is going to be? A lot of innocent people, black and white, are going to end up hurt or killed. And it's all going to be your ilk's fault. Even worse, thanks to those race pimps, Zimmerman was turned into a white man just to force this into a black/white issue but I suppose I fantasized that too.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|