Ah, NBC: Thank You For Proving There Is A Liberal Bias In The Media

[Rockntractor]

Is this how you always go about your critical thinking? You absolutely refuse to do even the most basic research or looking into something unless someone force feeds it to you?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=fox+news+distortions

There are countless examples.

I know the game you are playing. You are pretending that if you don't see it, it doesn't exist, therefore if you try your hardest to not see something, you can prevent it from being true. It's so blatant. You are trying really hard to not see it, which is why you will fall head over heels to argue, but you cannot spend 20 seconds doing a google search.

I admitted the flaws and faults and bias in liberal news organizations, are you guys so insecure that you need to protect Fox News with such valiance?

Who are you trying to fool? I know it, you all know it. It's like admitting what you already know is this taboo sin.

Get over it.

This has got to be the lamest bullshit you have pulled yet! I'm supposed to do Google searches for you to try to prove you right. Are you a complete idiot?

[Wei Wu Wei]

This has got to be the lamest bullshit you have pulled yet! I'm supposed to do Google searches for you to try to prove you right. Are you a complete idiot?

If you have any interest whatsoever on facts, you do some research. It's really not that complicated.

Your very statement here illustrates your entire motivation. "I'm supposed to do Google searches for you to try to prove you right. Are you a complete idiot?"

What do you mean "do google searches for me to try to prove me right"? How about do google searches for yourself? How about expanding your knowledge from various sources for it's own value. How about do google searches to find information to get a better idea of what's real and what's not? It is just a game to you. It's not about facts, not about reason, not about discussion, and sure as hell not about learning. All this is to you is a pissing contest.

It's not my job to teach you things, it's not my job to lead you to water, hold your head down and force you to drink it. I don't lose anything if you bury your own head in the sand. I'm not playing whatever game you seem to be playing. If you believe that intentionally avoiding information somehow makes you "win", then by all means, enjoy that victory.

[Rockntractor]

If you have any interest whatsoever on facts, you do some research. It's really not that complicated.

Your very statement here illustrates your entire motivation. "I'm supposed to do Google searches for you to try to prove you right. Are you a complete idiot?"

What do you mean "do google searches for me to try to prove me right"? How about do google searches for yourself? How about expanding your knowledge from various sources for it's own value. How about do google searches to find information to get a better idea of what's real and what's not? It is just a game to you. It's not about facts, not about reason, not about discussion, and sure as hell not about learning. All this is to you is a pissing contest.

It's not my job to teach you things, it's not my job to lead you to water, hold your head down and force you to drink it. I don't lose anything if you bury your own head in the sand. I'm not playing whatever game you seem to be playing. If you believe that intentionally avoiding information somehow makes you "win", then by all means, enjoy that victory.

You don't teach in any school, your an idiot. You make claims you can't back up and then talk in circles when your called on them. what a fraud!

[Apache]

Is this how you always go about your critical thinking? You absolutely refuse to do even the most basic research or looking into something unless someone force feeds it to you?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=fox+news+distortions

There are countless examples.

I know the game you are playing. You are pretending that if you don't see it, it doesn't exist, therefore if you try your hardest to not see something, you can prevent it from being true. It's so blatant. You are trying really hard to not see it, which is why you will fall head over heels to argue, but you cannot spend 20 seconds doing a google search.

I admitted the flaws and faults and bias in liberal news organizations, are you guys so insecure that you need to protect Fox News with such valiance?

Who are you trying to fool? I know it, you all know it. It's like admitting what you already know is this taboo sin.

Get over it.

alright wei, i checked your link. went to the huffpo page, which btw was a link to mediamatters ( no bias there ), but i digress. the first story i come across is about kevin jennings. it aired stating the boy was 15 not 16... was it a gross misrepresentation of facts? was it 'investigated' as nbc did? nope...

EDITOR'S NOTE: Since this story was originally published, the former student referred to as "Brewster" has stepped forward to reveal that he was 16 years old, not 15, at the time of the incident described in this report.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...#ixzz1rKDV1fnp

it was corrected...

again, you fail, even a cursory search proves you wrong...

[Hawkgirl]

If you have any interest whatsoever on facts, you do some research. It's really not that complicated.

Your very statement here illustrates your entire motivation. "I'm supposed to do Google searches for you to try to prove you right. Are you a complete idiot?"

What do you mean "do google searches for me to try to prove me right"? How about do google searches for yourself? How about expanding your knowledge from various sources for it's own value. How about do google searches to find information to get a better idea of what's real and what's not? It is just a game to you. It's not about facts, not about reason, not about discussion, and sure as hell not about learning. All this is to you is a pissing contest.

It's not my job to teach you things, it's not my job to lead you to water, hold your head down and force you to drink it. I don't lose anything if you bury your own head in the sand. I'm not playing whatever game you seem to be playing. If you believe that intentionally avoiding information somehow makes you "win", then by all means, enjoy that victory.

You're obviously not responding to a very simple request...let's try it in retard talk...

You thay Fox news is no good liars. We thay, peas be specifik and gimme esample. You thay, go google.


We say, that's no good. Give us esample.



We are waiting Weewee. You've written several post asking us to prove your stance...when all you have to do is give us ONE example. One example of deliberate inflammatory distortion to get more viewership...or for whatever reason.ONE Weewee..ONE example.

[txradioguy]

so mr. fail, you cannot back up....... can you?
you're pissed because al jizzinytheirhairya is not a trusted news source. you're pissed because the alphabet news gets called on blatant lies by fox commentators AND you're pissed because your baseless claim is thrown in your face...


hyperbole much?

No he can't and never will be able to back up his claim. Seems to be a recurring theme among Libs here.

Which is why I sat and behind what I said earlier about him being presented the facts an dismissing them out of hand because they don't fit his template.

[Odysseus]

Yes. That is the lesson of that quote. Nothing can be trusted but Fox. All others lie. Only Fox tells you the truth.

That's pretty much al Qaeda's position. Remember Bin Laden's advice to his subordinates about how to put out their 9/11 tenth anniversary message?

Bin Laden and his aides hoped for big terrorist operations to commemorate the 10th anniversary of Sept. 11, 2001. They also had elaborate media plans. Adam Gadahn, a U.S.-born media adviser, even discussed in a message to his boss what would be the best television outlets for a bin Laden anniversary video.

“It should be sent for example to ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN and maybe PBS and VOA. As for Fox News let her die in her anger,” Gadahn wrote. At another point, he said of the networks: “From a professional point of view, they are all on one level — except [Fox News] channel, which falls into the abyss as you know, and lacks objectivity, too.”

In other words, our enemies know that most of our media can be manipulated by their propaganda and will present their case to the American people, while Fox cannot be.

However, there is a significant difference in the quality of the journalism and standards of reporting between Al Jazeera and Fox News. There's no point in arguing this, so I'll make this as simple as can be.

If you even have the slightest shred of integrity on this subject, then try it yourself:

Click this link the moment you read this post and watch Al Jazeera English for 10 minutes. http://www.aljazeera.com/watch_now/

Hopefully it's 10 minutes later, now turn it onto Fox News right and watch it for 10 minutes. Go ahead.

If you can't see the difference between these two networks, you are intentionally keeping your head in tthe sand.

Yeah, there's a huge difference. Al Jazeera is an Islamist propaganda factory. It's the Pravda of the global jihad. Ten minutes of tastefully executed, carefully presented lies is still ten minutes of lies.

If you have any interest whatsoever on facts, you do some research. It's really not that complicated.

And yet, you never do any. You made the claim that Fox does the same thing that NBC does, which is fabricate evidence to support its narratives. When called on it, you resorted to bluster and a pathetic backpedaling in order to pretend that you didn't mean what you said, or that we are somehow distorting your position. The facts, which you claim that we aren't interested in, are that NBC falsified an audio clip in order to make a false charge of racism in a highly volatile news story. You claim that Fox has done the same thing, so the burden of proof is on you to provide an example. If you cannot do so, then admit it, or else we will know that you are a liar and a fraud.

[Wei Wu Wei]

You're obviously not responding to a very simple request...let's try it in retard talk...

You thay Fox news is no good liars. We thay, peas be specifik and gimme esample. You thay, go google.


We say, that's no good. Give us esample.



We are waiting Weewee. You've written several post asking us to prove your stance...when all you have to do is give us ONE example. One example of deliberate inflammatory distortion to get more viewership...or for whatever reason.ONE Weewee..ONE example.

I already posted your ONE example.

http://www.conservativeunderground.c...l=1#post496349

Now you can stop fixating on it and address the rest of my posts in this thread.

[Rockntractor]

I already posted your ONE example.

http://www.conservativeunderground.c...l=1#post496349

Now you can stop fixating on it and address the rest of my posts in this thread.

You have no idea how idiotic you have made yourself look here, if you ever had any credibility you don't anymore!

[Wei Wu Wei]

Yeah, there's a huge difference. Al Jazeera is an Islamist propaganda factory. It's the Pravda of the global jihad. Ten minutes of tastefully executed, carefully presented lies is still ten minutes of lies.

Give an example. Watch AJE for 10 minutes and specify which lies you saw. We always require proof.

And yet, you never do any. You made the claim that Fox does the same thing that NBC does, which is fabricate evidence to support its narratives. When called on it, you resorted to bluster and a pathetic backpedaling in order to pretend that you didn't mean what you said, or that we are somehow distorting your position. The facts, which you claim that we aren't interested in, are that NBC falsified an audio clip in order to make a false charge of racism in a highly volatile news story. You claim that Fox has done the same thing, so the burden of proof is on you to provide an example. If you cannot do so, then admit it, or else we will know that you are a liar and a fraud.

I already gave an example but sure I'll give more


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...?slidenumber=1

Fox News' Martha MacCallum displays a series of video clips which she claims were from the previous weekend. This includes a clip of Joe Biden talking about the ecconomy. She says multiple times that these videos were taken over the weekend, even though the video of Joe Biden was taken during the campaign.




http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...?slidenumber=2

Fox News deceptively edits a clip of a Q&A session. A question was asked "why don't we just have a European style system?". The President repeats the question and goes on to say he does not support such a plan, but Fox News edits the clip to simply show Obama repeating the question, so it appears he is supporting it. They remove the part where he says he disagrees with it.



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1...?slidenumber=4

Fox News claims to have gone back and done analysis on the stimulus and presents their research and findings. In reality, it is not Fox News' research, but a GOP press release which Fox claimed as it's own.



http://mediamatters.org/research/200908240024

Chris Wallace gives several distortions concerning the veterans health administration.




http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0..._n_182981.html

Fox News reports that Obama's budget plan was 4 times bigger than the costliest Bush budget. This is a simple outright lie. Bush sent budgets of 2.9 Trillion and 3.2 Trillion. Simple basic 3rd grade math.