#1 Should artists be paid a living wage?04-10-2012, 04:56 PM
They make it sooooo easy sometimes...
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 03:13 PM
Should artists be paid a living wage?
What amount should they be paid? Who would decide if they were a real artist? Should their be any volume requirements set for # of pieces of work per month/year?
Seems like as good a time as any to bring up this topic as some people seem to be able to define what a "real" artist is and could serve on the boards.May the FORCE be with you!
04-10-2012, 05:35 PM
This stuff is hilarious. We could turn it into a book. Something to read on the canďA creative man is motivated by the desire to achieve, not by the desire to beat others.Ē Ė Ayn Rand
Power Point Ranger
04-10-2012, 06:31 PM
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Southwest Michigan (in Exile)
ah yes...commie group think..."Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings..." Patrick Henry
04-10-2012, 07:01 PM
I just knocked out 17 paintings while I was reading that thread. Check please.
I honestly cannot even comprehend some of the things that come out of their heads.Be Not Afraid.
04-10-2012, 07:28 PM
"Our president delivered his State of the Union message to Congress. That is one of the things his contract calls for -- to tell congress the condition of the country. This message, as I say, is to Congress. The rest of the people know the condition of the country, for they live in it, but Congress has no idea what is going on in America, so the president has to tell 'em." ~ Will Rogers
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|