The idiocy here is astounding. So like, first you accuse me completely unprovoked of being a Ron Paul bot (because I dare suggest that Romney is the wrong pick for the GOP). And now you wade into this thread to make the enlightening connection that my lack of enthusiasm about ads and spam on the internet is evidence that my answer is always and categorically "more government" regardless of the problem.
So which is it, genius?
I still say the internet is for porn.
Olde-style, states' rights conservative. Ask if this concept confuses you.
If the USSC strikes down the prohibitions on gay marriage, I'm wondering how many gay couples in Michigan are willing to go to Dearborn and order a wedding cake from one of the Muslim bakeries? Will...