Thread: Princess Cruises to Investigate Why Captain Ignored Distress Call

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1 Princess Cruises to Investigate Why Captain Ignored Distress Call 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    331
    Princess Cruises is conducting an internal investigation after the captain of one of their ships reportedly ignored a passenger's report of a distress signal and continued on course, rather than coming to the rescue of a stranded Panamanian fishing vessel.

    Two of the fishing boat's three crew members later died of dehydration, one just one day after the encounter with the cruise ship.

    On Feb. 24, 2012, Adrian "Santi" Vasquez, 18, set out on a fishing trip with two friends, Oropeces Betancourt, 16, and 16-year-old Fernando Osario. The trip turned deadly when the trio discovered that the outboard motor on their small fishing vessel "The Fifty Cent" would not start, leaving them stranded in the middle of the ocean. The three Panamanian fishermen drifted for at sea for over two weeks, hungry, hot, and dehydrated, before they spotted the Star Princess cruise ship and started desperately signaling for a rescue.

    "It was a really big, white ship. I was waving a red t-shirt, and Fernando was waving a bright orange life jacket over his head. For a minute it looked like they were going to turn to come for us, but then they just went on their way," Vasquez, the crew's sole survivor, said in an interview with panama-guide.com.

    Meanwhile on the deck of the Star Princess, Judy Meredith of Bend, Oregon and Jeff Gilligan were bird watching with Jim Dowdall of Dublin, Ireland, when they spotted the Fifty Cent far off the ships starboard side.

    Equipped for bird watching, the group was armed with high power binoculars, spotting scopes, and cameras fitted with telephoto lenses -- all of which gave them a good view of the fishing boat in the distance.

    "I saw a young man in the front of the boat waving his shirt up and down. Big motions, up over his head and down to the floor, waving it vigorously. Frantically I would say," Meredith told "Good Morning America." "That signal told me that they were in trouble. They were trying everything they could to get our attention."

    Meredith said that they told someone at a desk they wanted to call the bridge and be sure they checked on the boat. She said that the man at the desk made a call, then came back out and looked through their spotting scopes at the boat, then went back inside.

    "Nothing happened," she told "GMA." "The ship didn't slow down. It didn't seem to change course. And so I went back in and asked what the captain was going to do. And he said he didn't know."

    Not pacified by the encounter, Meredith returned to her room where she wrote down the ships coordinates and sent an email to U.S Coast Guard in hopes that they would take action.

    "The boat appeared to be a disabled fishing boat with one person aboard and nets strung up from the masts. The person was actively waving a shirt or fabric object up and down with both hands. Since we were so many miles off shore and had not seen ANY watercraft all day, we summoned a representative from the ship and asked him to phone the bridge," Meredith wrote.

    "The rep then came back after calling the bridge of the Star Princess and looked through our scopes himself and could see the man waving something. By this time, he appeared farther away and was now waving a red flag," she continued in the email. "We took this to be a sign of distress. The boat could be disabled and the man adrift. The Star Princess did not turn around or appear to make any active attempt to deal with the information, so we were bothered and decided to send information somewhere ourselves although we realize this is NOT U.S. waters."

    The Coast Guard did not find the Fifty Cent however, and the boat floated aimlessly for another two weeks, during which both Bentancourt and Osario died of dehydration. On March 24, 2012, Vasquez, the sole remaining fisherman was rescued at sea by an Ecuadoran fishing boat.

    He was found 650 miles off shore, having thrown the bodies of his two friends overboard.

    "It's really frustrating that those young men were at sea two more weeks and two of them died! Two of them died because the ship didn't turn around," Meredith said.

    Princess Cruises confirmed in an email that they have launched an internal investigation into the matter, writing "We're aware of the allegations that Star Princess supposedly passed by a boat in distress that was carrying three Panamanian fishermen on March 10, 2012. At this time we cannot verify the facts as reported, and we are currently conducting an internal investigation on the matter."

    The consequences could be dire if it is found that the Captain, who claims that he believed the fisherman were waving at him as a thank you for avoiding their nets, was acting negligently in ignoring the fishermen's signals.

    Regulation 33 of the International Convention for the Safety of Life At Sea (SOLAS) Chapter V states:

    "The master of a ship at sea which is in a position to be able to provide assistance on receiving a signal from any source that persons are in distress at sea, is bound to proceed with all speed to their assistance, if possible informing them or the search and rescue service that the ship is doing so. If the ship receiving the distress alert is unable or, in the special circumstances of the case, considers it unreasonable or unnecessary to proceed to their assistance, the master must enter in the log-book the reason for failing to proceed to the assistance of the persons in distress, taking into account the recommendation of the Organization, to inform the appropriate search and rescue service accordingly."

    The Fifty Cent was not equipped with a functional radio, making communication between the two vessels, including confirmation that the boat was or was not sending a distress signal impossible. When the two ships encountered each other they were roughly 130 miles from the closest land, much farther out than a fishing boat the size of the Fifty Cent would normally go.
    Yahoo News
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    3,269
    I am starting to wonder just who the hell is being assigned as Master aboard these ships. This whole event is unthinkable......Take NO action?.....NO immediate investigation at sea?....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    LTC Member Odysseus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    FT Belvoir, VA
    Posts
    15,639
    Quote Originally Posted by Starbuck View Post
    I am starting to wonder just who the hell is being assigned as Master aboard these ships. This whole event is unthinkable......Take NO action?.....NO immediate investigation at sea?....
    Turning or stopping an ocean liner is a difficult proposition, but the regulations are clear. The Captain had an obligation to confirm the distress signal and respond, even if that response consisted of contacting the Coast Guard themselves (with their radio equipment, they could easily have done so) or launching an emergency beacon. This constitutes criminal negligence.
    --Odysseus
    Sic Hacer Pace, Para Bellum.

    Before you can do things for people, you must be the kind of man who can get things done. But to get things done, you must love the doing, not the people!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Power CUer noonwitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Warren, MI
    Posts
    11,865
    Quote Originally Posted by Odysseus View Post
    Turning or stopping an ocean liner is a difficult proposition, but the regulations are clear. The Captain had an obligation to confirm the distress signal and respond, even if that response consisted of contacting the Coast Guard themselves (with their radio equipment, they could easily have done so) or launching an emergency beacon. This constitutes criminal negligence.

    I would guess it would be very difficult to launch a rescue from one of those huge cruise ships at sea, but they should have immediately notified the Coast Guard, who is equipped to rescue people.


    In a legal sense, it's criminal negligence. In a moral sense, it is total disregard for humans in distress. Not that I'm ever going on a cruise, but if I was, I wouldn't be taking a Princess Cruise.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    331
    Quote Originally Posted by Odysseus View Post
    Turning or stopping an ocean liner is a difficult proposition, but the regulations are clear. The Captain had an obligation to confirm the distress signal and respond, even if that response consisted of contacting the Coast Guard themselves (with their radio equipment, they could easily have done so) or launching an emergency beacon. This constitutes criminal negligence.
    While I'm not sure what size this ocean liner was, but I thought the larger ones had small motor boats aboard.

    Regardless though, this certainly has the appearance of criminal negligence and is outright reprehensible. The notion that the Captain believed they were waving as a thank you for avoiding them is rather preposterous, especially in light of how they handled the woman who brought it to their attention.
    Last edited by Artois; 04-19-2012 at 11:49 AM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •