#1 U.S. ban sought on cell phone use while driving04-27-2012, 12:59 PM
Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:08pm EDT
* Drivers of any vehicle would be covered
* 3,000 U.S. fatalities from distracted driving last year
* Approach to compliance akin to anti-drunk driving campaign
By Jim Forsyth
SAN ANTONIO, April 26 (Reuters) - U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood called on Thursday for a federal law to ban talking on a cell phone or texting while driving any type of vehicle on any road in the country.
Tough federal legislation is the only way to deal with what he called a "national epidemic," he said at a distracted-driving summit in San Antonio, Texas, that drew doctors, advocates and government officials.
LaHood said it is important for the police to have "the opportunity to write tickets when people are foolishly thinking they can drive safely or use a cell phone and text and drive."
LaHood has previously criticized behind-the-wheel use of cell phones and other devices, but calling for a federal law prohibiting the practice takes his effort to a new level.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that 3,000 fatal traffic accidents nationwide last year were the result of distracted driving. Using a cell phone while driving delays reaction time the same amount as having a blood alcohol concentration of .08, the legal limit, the highway agency said.
But Gary Biller, president of the National Motorists Association, said laws banning specific actions like talking on a phone or texting are not necessary because those actions are already covered by existing distracted-driving laws. It would be more productive, he said, to invest resources in campaigns that discourage inattentive driving in general.
"It shouldn't matter if the driver is distracted by a conversation with another vehicle passenger, tuning the radio, eating a snack, or talking on a cell phone," Biller said in a statement. "Existing laws cover all those distractions and more."
LaHood said, however, he was not as concerned about people who eat, apply makeup, or perform other distracting activities in cars because "not everyone does that."
"But everyone has a cell phone and too many of us think it is OK to talk on our phones while we are driving," he said at the summit, sponsored by insurance company USAA, the Texas Department of Transportation and Shriners Hospitals for Children.
LaHood was joined by people who have been hurt in accidents caused by motorists talking on cell phones, including children in wheelchairs who were paralyzed. Such accidents are "100 percent preventable," he said.
He compared the situation facing the United States today with the problem of drunk driving 20-30 years ago.
"It used to be that if an officer pulled you over for drunk driving, he would pat you on the back, maybe call you a cab or take you home, but he wouldn't arrest you," LaHood said. "Now that has changed, and the same enforcement can work for people who talk on cell phones while driving."
Thirty-eight states have laws restricting or outlawing the use of electronic devices while driving, LaHood said.
LaHood said his department was researching the effect that hands-free devices and new systems like Ford Motor Company's Sync have on distracting drivers. He said he has called the CEOs of major car companies and encouraged them to "think twice" before placing too many Internet-based systems into new cars. (Editing By Corrie MacLaggan and Philip Barbara)
This is none of their business, just like their55 speed limit.
If we win this republic back from the emperor we need to start dismantling it!
04-27-2012, 01:46 PM
If we outlaw everything that could harm us, what will be left to do? Wouldn't be allowed to breath in Los Angeles.“A creative man is motivated by the desire to achieve, not by the desire to beat others.” – Ayn Rand
Power Point Ranger
04-27-2012, 01:53 PM
Let's just ban anything in a car that might be considered a distraction. No radios, no more interior temperature controls...not to mention no coffee or pop allowed either. And no talking either. When does it end?Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
04-27-2012, 02:23 PM
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
They'll need to define "driving" much better than the ridiculous DUI laws which allow prosecution of someone sleeping it off in a private parking lot. I'd be OK with a definition of driving which was limited to operation of the telephone while in the drivers seat and conducting the movement of a moving vehicle. But if you're just as guilty if you pull over to take the call (as I do from my 83 year old mother or my minor niece) , then fuck it.
04-27-2012, 02:26 PM
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
04-27-2012, 02:36 PM
I agree with the law. I'm tired of driving behind idiots who are either texting or talking on their cell phone, not paying attention while changing lanes or driving very slow so they don't make a typo. Screw them.
04-27-2012, 05:40 PM--Odysseus
Sic Hacer Pace, Para Bellum.
Before you can do things for people, you must be the kind of man who can get things done. But to get things done, you must love the doing, not the people!
04-27-2012, 06:54 PM
What state does not have a law re: "reckless driving" and/or "failure to yield"?
Enforce'm!It's not how old you are, it's how you got here.
It's been a long road and not all of it was paved.
A man is but a product of his thoughts. What he thinks, he becomes. Gandhi
Originally Posted by Carol
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|