"They're going to steal the election!"

[Lager]

Is it just me, or is the earliest we've seen the groundwork being laid for "stolen election" scenarios?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002656360

[Janice]

It could be. Weve never had a community organizer in chief. Voter fraud is as natural as the sun rising in the east to this POS.

[Madisonian]

Have they ever stopped since since 2000?

[Lager]

Have they ever stopped since since 2000?

Good point. They are consistent on that, at least.

[Apache]

Texastoast is ALIVE!!!!!

Atman

5. I fear it is too late.







They have the electro-voting boxes in place. They've suppressed the Democratic vote.

What can we do? We can encourage everyone -- EVERYONE -- to get out and vote in any way they can. Do provisionals, do mail-ins, do anything. Show them NUMBERS. Might the GOP machine steal it for Mitt? Yes, it could happen. Personally, I don't believe that will happen, but I believe it COULD happen. They're showing force. Democrats have to finally show MORE force.

TT. TT. TT...

How have you become so deluded?

[Lager]

The utter fallacy of their delusions is that Obama - being such a student and practioner of Chicago style politics - would have had his Attorney-General and other enforcers all over any hint of possible election fraud or tampering or machine box suspicions. That is, unless it was coming from their side.

Every time I witness how easily they can accept the myth that voter fraud could take place without the democratic party being aware of it or being able to stop it, I can't help but laugh.

[SarasotaRepub]

The utter fallacy of their delusions is that Obama - being such a student and practioner of Chicago style politics - would have had his Attorney-General and other enforcers all over any hint of possible election fraud or tampering or machine box suspicions. That is, unless it was coming from their side.

Every time I witness how easily they can accept the myth that voter fraud could take place without the democratic party being aware of it or being able to stop it, I can't help but laugh.

It's pathetic, but very funny...

[JB]

Atman

17. Because you obviously don't really know how the system works...

You have a name on the list...someone says "I'm Joe Blow at 123 Main Street." A 100 year old lady crosses your that name off a list. This is in your neighborhood. The checkers actually know, or recognize, most of the people coming through the lines. Either way, though, that vote is off this list. No one can vote that vote again. So if you're actually Bill Blow, at 789 Other Street, and try to vote again, that lady will look at you funny and say huh?

Actually, you don't know how the system works. Only a complete moron would try it the way you just outlined.

What happens is the Joe Blow person gets registered under a different name in a different precinct or two or three. Then Joe Blow goes around and votes more than once. Or Joe Blow registers his brother, who never votes, and sends someone else in to vote under his name. Those folks working the tables don't know everyone.

I've seen it happen. People come in to vote and don't know their address. I sent a few of them packing just a couple weeks ago. I know it happens. I've seen it happen.

Now, I'm not saying there's enough fraud out there to swing a presidential election (maybe there is if you target one or two states) but you can easily manipulate a local election without much effort.

[Janice]

Have they ever stopped since since 2000?

You mean since Kennedy v Nixon?

Nixon won btw ...

[Starbuck]

I see their problem. I can't find anyone who intends to vote for Obama. So, I guess any votes at all would be suspect.