Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1 Now I understand what Occupy Wall Street's problem is. It isn't their message. 
    eeeevil Sith Admin SarasotaRepub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    FL & MO
    Ahhhh...they finally come out and say it!!!

    Tue May 8, 2012, 05:07 PM

    Now I understand what Occupy Wall Street's problem is. It isn't their message.

    In Europe, laid-off Sony workers in France held the French branch's CEO hostage in response to the layoffs. France had some large scale protests over Sarkozy's austerity program. The cops tried to smack down the protests and they exploded into riots and then strikes. As of now, Sarkozy has been voted out of office, and the very survival of France's austerity programs is at grave risk.

    In Greece, anti-austerity protests broke out. The riot cops came out and tried to handle the protesters and things just got worse. Buildings were set on fire and even the police were caught on camera, on fire because of molotov cocktails. Strikes then followed. What has happened to Greece? The pro-austerity parties have lost power. The future of austerity in Greece is dim, to say the least.

    In Libya, Tunisia and Egypt, freedom was gained only by a whole lot of fighting back. The integrity of Egypt's rebellion is at risk primarily because the Egyptian military is kicking ass without repercussions.

    In America, nobody fights back beyond standing outside of the halls of the Plutocrats and protesting. Protesters get their asses kicked by the police and things stay the same. A notable exception is Wisconsin, where two major conditions occurred: the protesters numbered over a hundred thousand, and even the police were on the protesters' side. Things would be far worse in Wisconsin now if the public had not seen all those people, in force, with even the police acting like they were itching to join in.

    The problem is that people do not respect an organization that never fights back, even in the face of outright brutality and violence. But America stands alone in the world in that when protests are suppressed and they escalate into riots, the public now favors the police. As of late, they favor the police as if they were gods. When the police turn on you, in America, that's a very big nail in the coffin. This is a fairly recent turn of events; police brutality used to earn them a bad reputation; now it's called "getting tough on crime".

    So the problem with Occupy is not their message or their behavior. It's that they can't go out and kick ass. Sure, molotov cocktails would not be the way to go in America, but Occupy has other ways to kick ass: such as a concerted effort to deprive the police gangs of funding, which would be about just as devastating. Or bills that would outlaw their brutal actions during protests; or laws that strengthened free speech. Also, time will have to tell if the strikes on May 1 had any noticeable impact. Occupy has to find a way to handcuff the police thugs, ESPECIALLY the 7th largest army in the world, aka Bloomberg's NYPD.
    Translation: OWS needs to get violent, anyone surprised???
    May the FORCE be with you!
    Reply With Quote  

  2. #2  
    Senior Member Gina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Western MI
    15. It's becoming inevitable.

    Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.

    John F. Kennedy (1917-1963)
    from Wikipedia Nonviolent_revolution
    One theory of democracy is that its main purpose is to allow peaceful revolutions. The idea is that majorities voting in elections approximate the result of a coup. In 1962, John F. Kennedy famously said, "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."[3]

    This theory is rebutted by Murray Rothbard who points out that to more closely approximate such results, it would be necessary to disenfranchise the elderly, women, and those who are otherwise at a physical disadvantage in combat, and to give trained soldiers multiple votes. He also says that such theory, if carried to its logical conclusion, would require making voting more difficult (e.g. by spacing polling places further apart) and eliminating secret ballots, as those who would be deterred by inconvenience or persecution for revealing their support for a candidate would be unlikely to fight for him.
    Good men sleep peaceably in their beds at night because
    rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

    Real superheroes don't wear capes. They wear dog tags.
    Reply With Quote  

  3. #3  
    CU Royalty JB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Speck Tater

    1. Americans, even the relatively poor ones,...

    are far too coddled and comfortable and shielded from reality to ever risk going up against the system that coddles and protects them.
    Due to a lifetime of Democrat policies.

    Goldy, silvery, irony.
    Be Not Afraid.
    Reply With Quote  

  4. #4  
    LTC Member Odysseus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    FT Belvoir, VA
    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaRepub View Post
    Ahhhh...they finally come out and say it!!!

    Translation: OWS needs to get violent, anyone surprised???
    Only by the abject stupidity of the DUmmies who think this.
    Sic Hacer Pace, Para Bellum.

    Before you can do things for people, you must be the kind of man who can get things done. But to get things done, you must love the doing, not the people!
    Reply With Quote  

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts