Thread: Obama Seeks Sovereignty Surrender Via LOST Treaty

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11  
    Senior Member TVDOC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    280
    Quote Originally Posted by Janice View Post
    Hmm... sort of reminds me of what they said about 0bamacare.
    Obamacare passed under an (arguably illegal) "reconciliation" vote, which only required a simple majority.....and the Dems had a hell of a tough time getting that.......2/3rds ain't gonna happen, and the Constitution specifies that as the required vote......

    doc
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    Senior Member Janice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Southern USA
    Posts
    2,809


    0bama is secretly negotiating a number of globalist treaties that undermine American sovereignty in violation of the Constitution. The White House is doing an end run around Congress and the American people in order to lock the country into agreements on the environment, fishing rights and even gun ownership with the United Nations (UN). Its interesting to note that 'fast and furious' may have yet another meaning, under this regime.

    Of course the LOST treaty would take control of the seas around our nation and hand it to the UN. LOST is being promoted by a Clinton crony, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who seeks to surrender seas off the coasts of the United States to UN overseers. In a nutshell LOST will acquiesce to a UN council where U.S. companies can drill for oil or fish and which technologies must become global property via a form of intellectual eminent domain. The UN could tax up to 50% of royalties from offshore drilling and redistribute these proceeds to poorer nations.

    The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) could seriously interfere with the U.S. implementing any type of anti-missile shield to protect itself. Using the feel-good premise of decreasing space debris, in actuality this treaty would jeopardize the U.S. military’s ability to deploy platform-based weapons in space. Are Americans ready to forfeit their safety to the edicts of UN bureaucrats that already view us with outright enmity?

    0dumbo is working hand in glove with the United Nations to pass a new UN Small Arms Treaty. In early April, Sen. Rand Paul issued a statement saying the UN Small Arms Treaty is designed to 'register, ban and confiscate firearms owned by private citizens like you,'.

    Another international treaty Obama is negotiating would essentially ban all 'Buy American' laws. The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). 0bama is pushing hard to get the United States into the TPP, and Australia, Peru, Malaysia, Vietnam, Canada, Japan and South Korea are also reportedly interested in joining. And unfortunately, the leaders of both political parties are overwhelmingly in favor of the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

    Another is U.S. membership in the International Criminal Court (ICC). Where aggression is described as going to war without UN approval, which includes Russia and China. What kind of mind thinks that succumbing to this is a good idea? This tribunal that has jurisdiction across the globe and could prosecute elected U.S. leaders for entering into a war without UN approval. These 'crimes of aggression' — even if approved by Congress under an official declaration of war — could still land the president or cabinet members in prison. The ICC’s reach supersedes the rulings of any U.S. court, thereby posing a serious threat to constitutionally guaranteed trials by a jury of our peers.

    Another is the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) one advocating children's rights, would — at least superficially — protect youths from kidnapping, prostitution and human trafficking. However, if a 14-member panel determines that certain countries like the U.S. aren't providing enough funding for food, education or clothing to underdeveloped nations, the UN could levy a tax on American citizens and then redistribute this money to Third World countries.

    If these social-engineering thoughts aren't horrifying enough, Hillary remarked at the University of Texas in 1993, “Let us be willing to remold society by redefining what it means to be a human being in the 20th century, moving into the new millennium.”

    So who is our president obligated to: American citizens or the New World Order? Once signed and ratified, these treaties have the same status as constitutional law and cannot be altered or eclipsed by Congress or state legislatures. And their provisions must be enforced by U.S. courts. It doesnt take many republicrats to bend over and grab the ankles to make 0bamas day. The ship of state is being scuttled while many of us seem to think our liberties face no real threat because parlimentary procedures must be adhered to. Everything can change on a dime if 0bama sidesteps the Constitution yet again via executive orders. You just cant leave anything to chance with these clowns.
    Last edited by Janice; 05-24-2012 at 01:42 PM.
    http://i1220.photobucket.com/albums/dd445/JansGraphix/ConsUndergrd-Sig2.jpg
    Liberalism is just communism sold by the drink.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    Senior Member TVDOC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    280
    He can't enact a "Treaty" with an executive order......he can establish a temporary regulation, which will not be binding on the next administration.......unless it chooses not to revoke it.....

    The same pen that signs an EO, can remove it just as easily......they are also subject to legislative and judicial override......

    There is no such thing as a "permanent" EO, unless voted into law according to the Constitution, and passes muster with the courts.....

    doc
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #14  
    Senior Member Janice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Southern USA
    Posts
    2,809
    Guess you didnt hear... hes 'The One'. Didnt you see the Greek columns? And he 'took out' Osama-Obama single handedly. He even got a Nobel Peace prize because ... I dont know ... because hes 'God-like'. He doesnt need the House or the Senate. He doesnt need a constitution, dead or (living) alive. Heck he dont need anything ... hes fully 'self contained'. Hes full of himself!
    http://i1220.photobucket.com/albums/dd445/JansGraphix/ConsUndergrd-Sig2.jpg
    Liberalism is just communism sold by the drink.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #15  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    3,269
    The Bumbling O ain't going anywhere, even if he loses. He wants to become King of The World and if he loses to some third rate competitor from the Party of The Stupid while on his way, well, that's just the price he is willing to pay. They laughed at Jesus, didn't they? Well, voting Him out is just as tragic, or so he thinks.

    He will lay back and wait four years and hit it again. This time, there will be no move left unmade, no card unplayed. If he wins in '12 it will be bad; if he waits and then wins in '16 it will be catastrophic.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #16  
    Senior Member Janice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Southern USA
    Posts
    2,809
    Quote Originally Posted by Janice View Post


    0bama is secretly negotiating a number of globalist treaties that undermine American sovereignty in violation of the Constitution. The White House is doing an end run around Congress and the American people in order to lock the country into agreements on the environment, fishing rights and even gun ownership with the United Nations (UN). Its interesting to note that 'fast and furious' may have yet another meaning, under this regime.

    Of course the LOST treaty would take control of the seas around our nation and hand it to the UN. LOST is being promoted by a Clinton crony, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who seeks to surrender seas off the coasts of the United States to UN overseers. In a nutshell LOST will acquiesce to a UN council where U.S. companies can drill for oil or fish and which technologies must become global property via a form of intellectual eminent domain. The UN could tax up to 50% of royalties from offshore drilling and redistribute these proceeds to poorer nations.

    The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) could seriously interfere with the U.S. implementing any type of anti-missile shield to protect itself. Using the feel-good premise of decreasing space debris, in actuality this treaty would jeopardize the U.S. military’s ability to deploy platform-based weapons in space. Are Americans ready to forfeit their safety to the edicts of UN bureaucrats that already view us with outright enmity?

    0dumbo is working hand in glove with the United Nations to pass a new UN Small Arms Treaty. In early April, Sen. Rand Paul issued a statement saying the UN Small Arms Treaty is designed to 'register, ban and confiscate firearms owned by private citizens like you,'.

    Another international treaty Obama is negotiating would essentially ban all 'Buy American' laws. The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). 0bama is pushing hard to get the United States into the TPP, and Australia, Peru, Malaysia, Vietnam, Canada, Japan and South Korea are also reportedly interested in joining. And unfortunately, the leaders of both political parties are overwhelmingly in favor of the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

    Another is U.S. membership in the International Criminal Court (ICC). Where aggression is described as going to war without UN approval, which includes Russia and China. What kind of mind thinks that succumbing to this is a good idea? This tribunal that has jurisdiction across the globe and could prosecute elected U.S. leaders for entering into a war without UN approval. These 'crimes of aggression' — even if approved by Congress under an official declaration of war — could still land the president or cabinet members in prison. The ICC’s reach supersedes the rulings of any U.S. court, thereby posing a serious threat to constitutionally guaranteed trials by a jury of our peers.

    Another is the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) one advocating children's rights, would — at least superficially — protect youths from kidnapping, prostitution and human trafficking. However, if a 14-member panel determines that certain countries like the U.S. aren't providing enough funding for food, education or clothing to underdeveloped nations, the UN could levy a tax on American citizens and then redistribute this money to Third World countries.

    If these social-engineering thoughts aren't horrifying enough, Hillary remarked at the University of Texas in 1993, “Let us be willing to remold society by redefining what it means to be a human being in the 20th century, moving into the new millennium.”

    So who is our president obligated to: American citizens or the New World Order? Once signed and ratified, these treaties have the same status as constitutional law and cannot be altered or eclipsed by Congress or state legislatures. And their provisions must be enforced by U.S. courts. It doesnt take many republicrats to bend over and grab the ankles to make 0bamas day. The ship of state is being scuttled while many of us seem to think our liberties face no real threat because parlimentary procedures must be adhered to. Everything can change on a dime if 0bama sidesteps the Constitution yet again via executive orders. You just cant leave anything to chance with these clowns.


    These topics and more in this book just put out by Dick Morris:

    Screwed!: How Foreign Countries Are Ripping America Off and Plundering Our Economy-and How Our Leaders Help Them Do It
    http://i1220.photobucket.com/albums/dd445/JansGraphix/ConsUndergrd-Sig2.jpg
    Liberalism is just communism sold by the drink.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #17  
    Senior Member Janice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Southern USA
    Posts
    2,809


    The way out of ObamaNation is the collapse of Agenda 21

    As dominant as he is in our worries and thoughts, the man they call Barack Hussein Obama is not the most important Agent of Change in daily life. Deliberately flamboyant by design, he’s only the most noticeable one.

    Obama is the handpicked decoy for this particular point in time; the one who draws attention away from One Worlders who work to capture America by stealth; the seemingly impossible to remove Candy Man, enabled by 50 percent of the U.S. voting population.

    As prime decoy, Obama is the main player on the current politician populated World stage. While their antics keep all eyes trained their way, the real Agent of Change works 24-7 in the background laying the groundwork to enslave you.

    The more outrageous antics the performance of Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and now Elizabeth Warren and Debbie Wasserman Schultz mesmerize, the more we miss seeing the subtle noose descending on an unknowing population. >>>

    “In case you’re still unsure how Agenda 21 operates >>>

    “This is Agenda 21. The UN intends to control your life, through incremental mandates instituted by your local government bureaucracy. You will never see it. You will never vote on it. No matter which path they use, the agencies can pen the new regulations under ‘threat’ of lawsuit and down the pipe it comes: enforceable administrative rules without legislation.”[1]

    The UN successfully fends off citizen resistance to Agenda 21 by hiding it behind innocuous sounding names like “sustainable development” and by branding all resisters as conspiracy theorists.

    But the build-up to One World Government for North America is fully documented and there is irrefutable proof in the making of Agenda 21 that it transcends a left-right paradigm. >>>

    Obama has another four more years to implement One World Order. If the UN’s end game cannot be accomplished during the next four years, Obama will run and win the presidential election again. >>>

    If we are to regain our freedom as sovereign nations, our search for the answers must take us beyond Barack Hussein Obama. >>>

    Its increasing control of our towns and cities notwithstanding, Agenda 21 is not impossible to put down and defeat because Agenda 21 has at least one provable weakness. Had it not been for Smart Meters, public attention might never have been called to the encroaching One World Order being implemented today by Barack Obama.

    CanadaFreePress

    Who says the Mercedez Marxist doesnt have a plan?
    http://i1220.photobucket.com/albums/dd445/JansGraphix/ConsUndergrd-Sig2.jpg
    Liberalism is just communism sold by the drink.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •