Thread: BCE

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26
  1. #21  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,468
    Quote Originally Posted by AmPat View Post
    You nailed it. Good job.
    Thanks.



    Wait, are you making fun of me now?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #22  
    Resident Grandpa marv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Shell Knob, MO
    Posts
    3,022
    I grew up with "Before Christ" and "Anno Domini". If that's good enough for this atheist, it's good enough for Christians.

    Why not just start the calendar with the "Big Bang"

    http://members.socket.net/~mcruzan/images/allen-west.jpg

    Four boxes keep us free: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.

    THIS POST WILL BE MONITORED BY THE NSA
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #23  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,468
    Quote Originally Posted by marv View Post
    Why not just start the calendar with the "Big Bang"
    Phooey. Let's pay tribute to how DU members think and start the calendar when they think history began: January 20, 2001.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #24  
    Senior Member Chuck58's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New Mexico USA
    Posts
    990
    As far as I'm concerned it's AD and BC.

    Also, I grew up with inches, feet, yards, pints, quarts, gallons, pecks etc and I'm not interested in learning metric anything.
    The poster formerly known as chuck58 on the old board.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #25  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,615
    BCE has been in wide use by historians and theologians for quite some time (about 400 years' time). The reason for the BCE designation as opposed to AD/BC is that a careful study of a lot of historical documents tells us that Jesus was actually born, based upon our current BC/AD calendar, somewhere between 4 and 7 BC, not right at year #1. Furthermore, if the split between BC and AD is the moment of Jesus' birth, then New Year's Day would be December 25 (but for the fact that Jesus was almost certainly born in the spring and not December). In short, for the purposes of exacting history study, AD/BC really isn't a very good measure, nor, indeed, is the moment of Jesus' birth, since no one really knows quite when that was. BCE is a scientific, historical designation for the purpose of scientific and historical research. There is nothing about it that in any way disses Christians or Christianity.

    The first time I heard the term BCE was in my New Testament class at my very fundamentalist Baptist university, from a professor who was just this side of a snake-handler. This man took offense at Halloween, but he was perfectly fine with the use of BCE. If there was any Christian on earth who could find a valid reason to feel insulted by the BCE designation, this man would have been it.




    The notion that it is some sort of moonbattery designed to insult or belittle Christians and/or Christianity just doesn't hold up.
    Olde-style, states' rights conservative. Ask if this concept confuses you.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #26  
    Senior Member Generation Why?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Thurston County, WA
    Posts
    709
    Quote Originally Posted by marv View Post
    I grew up with "Before Christ" and "Anno Domini". If that's good enough for this atheist, it's good enough for Christians.

    Why not just start the calendar with the "Big Bang"


    It is. Spoiler alert: The majority of us hate those idiots who try to find a lawsuit in anything doing with "Under God" or "In God We Trust"
    A creative man is motivated by the desire to achieve, not by the desire to beat others. Ayn Rand

    Power Point Ranger
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •