Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1 DelUsional spinners 
    Member Cicero's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Western PA
    Posts
    60
    http://www.democraticunderground.com/125145388

    My personal favorite:

    I heard someone else say that it looks like the work of Michelle Bachmann

    She is now on the committee that has the knowledge that was leaked. She is known even amongst her own party for not being able to keep her mouth shut. And she also has every motive to want to sink the Obama administration.

    In other words: It was a set up.

    Sounds good to me.


    So it was Bachmann all along? She probably piloted the plane that didn't crash into a field in PA on 9/11 as well.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    eeeevil Sith Admin SarasotaRepub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Sarasota,FL
    Posts
    42,825
    HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
    May the FORCE be with you!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member Gina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Western MI
    Posts
    2,360
    It would be nice to have a new "B" for BDS.
    Good men sleep peaceably in their beds at night because
    rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.



    Real superheroes don't wear capes. They wear dog tags.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    LTC Member Odysseus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    FT Belvoir, VA
    Posts
    15,638
    There is one marginally sane poster in that thread:

    Response to left on green only (Reply #2)
    Tue Jun 12, 2012, 09:43 PM
    Enrique (18,314 posts)
    6. i heard that too


    imo it is a half-baked theory. Two big problems right off the bat, 1)no way in hell David Sanger is going to use Michele Bachmann as a source for a story about Obama's deliberations. 2)she would have no motive, because the stories help Obama politically. The Bachmann types are frustrated because they ruin the picture of Obama being weak on national security.


    I particularly like the moonbat who didn't think that the leaks had caused any harm. I guess that the doctor in Pakistan who is now serving hard time for assisting us isn't on their radar, or the other people throughout the world who will now be afraid to help us because they know that we cannot keep a secret. Then, there are our allies, who might find having the details of our joint covert actions being broadcast in the media just a tad off-putting. Can't wait for Obama to try to get an update on something critical from Shin Bet or Mossad after this. They whined about Valerie Plame, who was not a field op, and whose life was never endangered by being outed by, among others, her husband, but the SEALs whose helicoptor was downed a few weeks after the Bin Laden raid was made public knowledge may have been specifically targeted because of it.
    --Odysseus
    Sic Hacer Pace, Para Bellum.

    Before you can do things for people, you must be the kind of man who can get things done. But to get things done, you must love the doing, not the people!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Member Cicero's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Western PA
    Posts
    60
    Post 22 seems to have a hidden message. If intentional it is hilarious.

    Not so sure.

    Going out of their way to make Obama look bad is par for the course with the media and the right. On the
    other hand the leaks did have to come from somewhere and a NYT reporter said "high administration official."

    My theory is that someone did in fact leak this information out of loyalty to their boss in the hopes that
    it would counter the bs about Obama not being strong on terrorism. In fact he is a lot stronger in the issue
    than a some of us would like. I don't think it hurts us politically but it does give the other side something
    to yap about for a while and hopefully they hang themselves with it like they did in the Clinton years.
    Last edited by Cicero; 06-14-2012 at 07:08 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,468
    Initial (as far as I can tell) speculation about Bachmann:

    http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002794121
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •