Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1 Checking the APA's Findings on Homosexual Parenting 
    PORCUS MAXIMUS Rockntractor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    41,862
    By Janice Shaw Crouse

    Since 2005, when the American Psychological Association (APA) issued an official brief on lesbian and gay parenting, political correctness has demanded that all agree with the spurious assessment that children of homosexual parents do fine. The APA declared, "A growing body of scientific literature demonstrates that children who grow up with one or two gay and/or lesbian parents fare as well in emotional, cognitive, social, and sexual functioning as do children whose parents are heterosexual. Children's optimal development seems to be influenced more by the nature of the relationships and interactions within the family unit than by the particular structural form it takes." In a fit of concurrence, elite opinion-makers, academics, and those in the mainstream media voiced their wisdom by declaring that any household structure works well as long as there are loving relationships within the family unit.

    In the absence of research to the contrary and a barrage of positive media images of homosexuals in family settings, public attitudes were manipulated into widespread acceptance of same-sex parenting. The few lone dissenting voices were harassed and discredited.

    But the prestigious Social Science Research journal recently published highly credited research that counters the prevailing public and scientific attitudes. Loren Marks, of Louisiana State University, authored "Same-Sex Parenting and Children's Outcomes: A Closer Examination of the American Psychological Association's Brief on Lesbian and Gay Parenting," which uses objective scientific methods to examine the APA assertion about the outcomes of homosexual parenting. Marks' research calls into question the validity of the research methods and analysis of the 59 published studies cited by the APA.

    Marks concluded that the APA assertions about homosexual parenting were not empirically warranted -- i.e., the data presented doesn't validate their hypothesis. He found that the sampling that these researchers used was not representative: the samples are too small, they do not include data of the comparison groups, and the diversity of homosexual parenting studies was dismissed. In addition, only a limited scope of children's outcomes was studied. Furthermore, the research lacked the statistical power expected by APA standards.

    Research samples are not representative.
    Samples are too small. Marks argues that "more than three-fourths (77%) of the studies cited by the APA brief are based on small, non-representative, convenient samples of fewer than 100 participants. Many of the non-representative samples contain far fewer than 100 participants."
    Samples did not include heterosexual comparison groups. Marks finds that "many same-sex parenting researchers did not use marriage-based, intact families as heterosexual representatives, but instead used single mothers." That is to say, outcomes for married, intact mom-dad families were not the basis for comparison in the research studies to the same-sex parents; instead, same-sex and single-mother households were compared.
    Study samples did not consider the diversity of homosexual parents. A great amount of research has paid close attention to the diversity of heterosexual-parent families in terms of their various family structures (married intact families, cohabiting, divorced, step- and single-parent families), economic and educational levels, race, and so forth. However, the homosexual-parents studies are "biased toward well-educated, privileged, white women with high incomes." Marks noted that these factors have plagued other same-sex parenting studies as well.

    Children's outcomes were not fully researched.
    The focus of most studies was on parental outcomes, not children's. The APA claimed, "Not a single study has found children of lesbian or gay parents to be disadvantaged in any significant respect relative to children of heterosexual parents." (Apparently, few eyebrows were raised at the categorical denial of "any" negative findings whatsoever.) Appallingly, the research supporting this argument did not research children's outcomes. Marks argues that some studies "focused on fathers' reports of fathers' values and behaviors, not on children's outcomes -- illustrating a recurring tendency in the same-sex parenting literature to focus on the parent rather than the child."
    The long-term outcomes of children of lesbian and "gay" parents were not fully researched. Studies have shown that in the case of cohabiting families and "two-biological-parent married families," the differences in children's outcomes increase in significance as the children grow older. This indicates the importance of the examination of long-term outcomes. Marks supposes that "the likelihood of significant differences arising between children from same-sex and married families may also increase across time -- not just into adolescence, but into early and middle adulthood."

    The research lacked the statistical power expected by APA standards.
    In his most pivotal criticism of the same-sex parenting studies, Marks' showed that, rather than large random samples that are representative, the data underlying the APA official brief consisted of small, select convenience samples repeated by different researchers of same-sex families. According to Marks, "[t]he 2005 APA Brief seems to draw inferences of sameness based on the observation that gay and lesbian parents and heterosexual parents appear not to be statistically different from one another based on small, non-representative samples -- thereby becoming vulnerable to a classic Type II error ... the logic behind replication is undermined." He used Lerner and Nagai (2001)'s book-length examination of same-sex parenting studies as the supportive argument. In their work, Lerner and Nagai indicate that 17 of the 22 same-sex parenting comparison studies they reviewed had been designed in such a way that the odds of failing to find a significant difference (between homo- and heterosexual groups) was 85% or higher.

    In conclusion, Loren Marks' "Same-Sex Parenting and Children's Outcomes: A Closer Examination of the American Psychological Association's Brief on Lesbian and Gay Parenting" serves as a careful scientific examination of the flaws of the APA's untenable assertion that "[n]ot a single study has found children of lesbian or gay parents to be disadvantaged in any significant respect relative to children of heterosexual parents." Any finding as extreme as this one cannot help but violate the common sense of ordinary folks. It simply bears out what many have come to see as the perfidy of the educated elites' attempts to foist off on the public views that conform to their biased beliefs -- however unreasonable -- rather than views that conform to the facts. Marks' study proves yet again the old adage: "If something seems too good to be true, it generally is."

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/...parenting.html
    How is obama working out for you?
    http://i686.photobucket.com/albums/vv230/upyourstruly/5d569df9-186a-477b-a665-3ea8a8b9b655_zpse9003e54.jpg
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    CU Royalty JB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    7,906
    It simply bears out what many have come to see as the perfidy of the educated elites' attempts to foist off on the public views that conform to their biased beliefs -- however unreasonable -- rather than views that conform to the facts.
    Just add it to the list of things that the American public has been duped about.

    And we need some other term than educated elites. They may be educated (that's questionable too) but they are hardly intelligent. Obnoxious liberal assholes sounds better.
    Be Not Afraid.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,468
    He found that the sampling that these researchers used was not representative: the samples are too small, they do not include data of the comparison groups, and the diversity of homosexual parenting studies was dismissed. In addition, only a limited scope of children's outcomes was studied. Furthermore, the research lacked the statistical power expected by APA standards.
    I believe these were much the same complaints I heard from conservatives who initially assessed the APA's "findings."
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member Generation Why?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Thurston County, WA
    Posts
    709
    So the study was half-assed. Ok. Doesn't mean we were "duped". It means they need a larger sample size and more concise goal in mind.
    “A creative man is motivated by the desire to achieve, not by the desire to beat others.”Ayn Rand

    Power Point Ranger
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Moderator txradioguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bavaria
    Posts
    7,630
    Quote Originally Posted by Generation Why? View Post
    So the study was half-assed. Ok.




    Doesn't mean we were "duped".
    Yes it does. Like with Global Warming and carbon emissions and DDT...we were led to believe...by shoddy research that gay parenting had no different outcome on a child or young adult as straight parents. We were bombarded by special interest groups...celebrities and the media with stories about how wonderful and well adjusted kids with two moms or two dads raising them were.

    Now that has been found to be false.



    It means they need a larger sample size and more concise goal in mind.
    Typical Liberal move...cook the books as much as it takes to get the desired outcome.
    In Memory Of My Friend 1st Sgt. Tim Millsap A Co, 70th Eng. Bn. 3rd Bde 1st AD...K.I.A. 25 April 2005

    Liberalism Is The Philosophy Of The Stupid

    To Achieve Ordered Liberty You Must Have Moral Order As Well

    The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member Generation Why?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Thurston County, WA
    Posts
    709
    @tx

    Well we agree that global warming is a crock. But I won't say that because this study was crap that gay people aren't capable of raising children
    “A creative man is motivated by the desire to achieve, not by the desire to beat others.”Ayn Rand

    Power Point Ranger
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    PORCUS MAXIMUS Rockntractor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    41,862
    Quote Originally Posted by Generation Why? View Post
    @tx

    Well we agree that global warming is a crock. But I won't say that because this study was crap that gay people aren't capable of raising children
    The article did not say that gay people aren't capable of raising children, you can't be taken seriously on much.
    How is obama working out for you?
    http://i686.photobucket.com/albums/vv230/upyourstruly/5d569df9-186a-477b-a665-3ea8a8b9b655_zpse9003e54.jpg
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member Generation Why?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Thurston County, WA
    Posts
    709
    Quote Originally Posted by Rockntractor View Post
    The article did not say that gay people aren't capable of raising children, you can't be taken seriously on much.
    I know that wasn't in there but it is an underlying question that is at the base of this topic to many people.
    “A creative man is motivated by the desire to achieve, not by the desire to beat others.”Ayn Rand

    Power Point Ranger
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •