Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1 Fast and Furious vs Wide Receiver 
    Senior Member Gina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Western MI
    Posts
    2,360


    That pretty much sums it up.
    Good men sleep peaceably in their beds at night because
    rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.



    Real superheroes don't wear capes. They wear dog tags.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    PORCUS MAXIMUS Rockntractor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    42,147
    We have conservatives on this forum that will try to tell you Fast and furious was a continuation of Bush's Wide receiver and that Obama is likely in the clear, some people swallow whatever main stream media is serving at the time.
    The difference between pigs and people is that when they tell you you're cured it isn't a good thing.
    http://i.imgur.com/FHvkMSE.jpg
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member Gina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Western MI
    Posts
    2,360
    Quote Originally Posted by Rockntractor View Post
    We have conservatives on this forum that will try to tell you Fast and furious was a continuation of Bush's Wide receiver and that Obama is likely in the clear, some people swallow whatever main stream media is serving at the time.
    That's what happens when you don't investigate things for yourself. Even wikipedia gives the dates that show they are 2 separate things.
    Good men sleep peaceably in their beds at night because
    rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.



    Real superheroes don't wear capes. They wear dog tags.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member Chuck58's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New Mexico USA
    Posts
    990
    Quote Originally Posted by Rockntractor View Post
    We have conservatives on this forum that will try to tell you Fast and furious was a continuation of Bush's Wide receiver and that Obama is likely in the clear, some people swallow whatever main stream media is serving at the time.
    Too many people don't do their homework. No guns got away and they're all accounted for, Mexico assisted us, and NOBODY DIED. Wide Receiver ended in 2007.

    About 2 yrs later obama's disaster started, and didn't end until the death of Brian Terry. Additionally, most of those guns are still out there. The death count is bound to rise.
    The poster formerly known as chuck58 on the old board.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member Gina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Western MI
    Posts
    2,360
    How the left is orchestrating Fast and Furious - Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points Memo

    http://video.foxnews.com/v/1702855653001/
    Good men sleep peaceably in their beds at night because
    rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.



    Real superheroes don't wear capes. They wear dog tags.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member Tecate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    566
    There's another element missing from the OP about "Fast and Furious"...

    Used to blame the 2nd Amendment...

    Still used to blame the 2nd Amendment, even after they were caught red-handed doing it...


    This is what pisses me off the most of all.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,154
    Quote Originally Posted by Rockntractor View Post
    We have conservatives on this forum that will try to tell you Fast and furious was a continuation of Bush's Wide receiver and that Obama is likely in the clear, some people swallow whatever main stream media is serving at the time.
    liberals having been harping the same thing over and over again...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    nc
    Posts
    667
    Quote Originally Posted by Rockntractor View Post
    We have conservatives on this forum that will try to tell you Fast and furious was a continuation of Bush's Wide receiver and that Obama is likely in the clear, some people swallow whatever main stream media is serving at the time.
    That is sad. Giving out incorrect information doesn't help our case. No way in hell can we out lie them. Best thing is to get our facts straight.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,468
    Quote Originally Posted by Gina View Post
    That pretty much sums it up.
    The Obamateers still won't understand the difference. They'll continue to blame Bush.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •