Originally Posted by Novaheart
That's my experience. Feel free to tell your own story. I've never met an Anglo Saxon woman who is married to a Filipino male, so I can't report on the differences there.
The term Anglo-Saxon is used by some historians to designate the Germanic tribes who invaded and settled the south and east of Britain beginning in the early 5th century and the period from their creation of the English nation up to the Norman conquest. The Anglo-Saxon era denotes the period of English history between about 550 and 1066. The term is also used for the language, now known as Old English, that was spoken and written by the Anglo-Saxons and their descendants in England (and part of southeastern Scotland) between at least the mid-5th century and the mid-12th century.
Well that explains why you've never seen this.
Don't you find it odd that Libtards who think they're smarter than they really are are the ones obsessed with race and catagories for certain groups of people?Don't you find it odd that most mixed marriages of blacks and whites feature a black male and caucasian female, but most mixed marriages of caucasians and mongoloid/API feature a caucasian male and noncaucasian female? Clearly there is another dynamic in play.
You're either being disingenuious...obtuse or both...especially given your claims of having grown up around the military.
Mixed marriages of all colors are a normal sight on any base or post...and you'd know that already had you been around the military for any period of time.
The last major I worked for...Korean...married a white female.
The Brigade commander where I am now..white...married to a black woman...same thing goes for the MSG who is our retention NCO.
Those are just a couple examples of what I've seen in my 20 years in and around the military...I could go on.
W. Texas where I'm from...hispanics marrying whites is as common as the sun coming up.
So what exactly was the point you were trying to make here Novatwit?
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|