He could face one year and/or up to $250k if convicted.
Ugh. Robbing a bank should not be considered an act of terrorism, and threatening to rob a bank should not be considered a threat of terrorism. Last thing I want is Homeland Security getting involved in day-to-day crime, and then "needing" more money because of all the cases they're handling.
Does this mean a bank robber is an enemy combatant / terrorist, and can be held indefinitely?