Thread: Liberals are afraid ,Very Afraid .The election has poisoned the atmosphere

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1 Liberals are afraid ,Very Afraid .The election has poisoned the atmosphere 
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    'Gang of 20' won't offer energy bill:D

    A bipartisan group of senators who sought a compromise in the rancorous energy debate won't introduce their bill before lawmakers adjourn for the elections, several Senate aides said Thursday.Instead, the so-called Gang of 20 will offer a statement of principals outlining their agreement on a host of divisive issues, including expanded offshore drilling. They plan to offer legislation once the political season has ended, according to an aide to a Democrat involved in the discussions. The aide said that the election-year environment has poisoned the atmosphere and hampered the chances of passing a bill on such a controversial campaign topic....snip

    No legislative language was drafted in early August. But the group agreed to a broad set of goals, including transitioning 85 percent of the country's automobiles to non-petroleum-based fuels within 20 years, providing incentives to boost nuclear energy, repealing billions in subsidies for oil companies, opening the Eastern Gulf of Mexico off of Florida for oil exploration, and allowing Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia to decide whether to allow drilling off their shores.

    Since the group won't offer a bill, it's unclear how the energy debate will unfold days before the scheduled Sept. 26 adjournment. Since consideration of the bill was expected to play a significant role in the debate, some senior aides expected Democrats would scrap next week's energy debate, in light of the packed scheduled before the recess and the heightened focus on the economic downturn. But no decisions have been announced, according to a Democratic leadership aide.

    Democrats, under pressure to lift a nearly three-decade-old ban on drilling, seemed open to the plan to deflect criticism that they were standing in the way of finding more domestic supplies.

    But many Republicans criticized the plan, raising concerns that by offering a compromise to Democrats and their presidential candidate Barack Obama, it would blunt a potent election-year attack that has gained traction at the polls. GOP presidential candidate John McCain opposed the plan, and Democrats were preparing to attack the Arizona senator for standing in the way of a bipartisan compromise. And many Republicans, like Sen. McCain, said repealing subsidies from oil companies would amount to a tax hike.


    http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/...008-09-18.html
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Thailand/Arizona
    Posts
    766
    In other words, congress pays lip service to the growing issue of energy dependance and does nothing.

    Move along folks. Nothing to see here. Keep moving.......
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    When they get home to campaign there are going to be a lot of questions on why they allowed the banking system to fail and what part all of their pork played in it.The high price of gasoline is a gut pocket book issue .

    They can't afford to support the treeHumpers and hold off an angry voting public at the same time when their reelections are at hand .Pelosi has a different problem,her voters are looking for Bushes scalp and she will have to hold off a mob of screaming Maoists pinko's calling for an end of America's oil and all energy !Reids supporters are just plain stupid to reelect that little turd !
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    congress doesn't NEED to offer a bill. The current prohibition expires shortly. They need only sit back and relax and the envirowackos lose.
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    Quote Originally Posted by PoliCon View Post
    congress doesn't NEED to offer a bill. The current prohibition expires shortly. They need only sit back and relax and the envirowackos lose.
    They won't giveup without a fight.They have supporters with very deep pockets and all politicians are such whores for cash !
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    Quote Originally Posted by megimoo View Post
    They won't giveup without a fight.They have supporters with very deep pockets and all politicians are such whores for cash !
    yet another reason to advocate for term limits.
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Super Moderator BadCat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    In your dreams
    Posts
    15,600
    Quote Originally Posted by PoliCon View Post
    yet another reason to advocate for term limits.
    You bet.
    +1
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member marinejcksn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Penn State
    Posts
    1,820
    Quote Originally Posted by BadCat View Post
    You bet.
    +1
    I concur.
    "Don't vote. It only encourages the bastards." -PJ O'Roarke
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Woodland Park, Colorado, United States
    Posts
    8,563
    Quote Originally Posted by PoliCon View Post
    yet another reason to advocate for term limits.
    And line item veto.
    Education without values, as useful as it is, seems rather to make man a more clever devil.
    C. S. Lewis
    Do not ever say that the desire to "do good" by force is a good motive. Neither power-lust nor stupidity are good motives. (Are you listening Barry)?:mad:
    Ayn Rand
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    Quote Originally Posted by AmPat View Post
    And line item veto.
    How do you propose to get a term limit bill through the Congress when when those thieving lawyers vote on their own fate ?
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •