Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19
  1. #11  
    Fabulous Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    10,161
    Quote Originally Posted by txradioguy View Post
    You know...you were actually starting to sound like a rational thinking human being with that post until you took your gratuitous and uncalled for...and quite frankly unneeded shot at religion.

    You know it IS ok to make a point here relative to a topic without getting a cheap shot in on one of your pet peeves.
    Global Warming is a religion. It's a belief system with a myth at its center, and back and fill which includes some actual people and events to make it more plausible. But it's still a belief system, not a science system.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    Fabulous Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    10,161
    Quote Originally Posted by Rockntractor View Post
    You have moments of lucidity followed by delusion, take your lithium.
    I'm not the one who believes in the magic sky creature who is somehow the source of all that is good without being responsible for all that is bad. If that sounds a bit like, "Lot's of snow is a sign of Global Warming" and "No snow is a sign of Global Warming" it's because it's the same kind of stuff.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    Senior Member wasp69's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    444
    Quote Originally Posted by Novaheart View Post
    It's rather like arguing the absurdity of Christianity with the Catholic Church: they have had 1500 years to make up excuses (more or less plausible depending upon the willingness you have to believe) for why the gaping holes in the science and logic of the Bible aren't evidence of its humanity rather than its divinity.
    You're a lapsed Catholic, aren't you?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #14  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,838
    Al Gore invented the internet. He thinks in binary. 4000 degrees in bin = 111110100000
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #15  
    Senior Member Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,158
    Quote Originally Posted by wasp69 View Post
    You're a lapsed Catholic, aren't you?
    or a episcopalian
    We're from Philadelphia, We Fight- Chip Kelly
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #16  
    CU Royalty JB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    8,093
    Quote Originally Posted by Novaheart View Post
    they have had 1500 years to make up excuses...for why the gaping holes in the science and logic of the Bible aren't evidence of its humanity rather than its divinity.
    Such as?
    Be Not Afraid.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #17  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,468
    I had a brief letter to the editor printed about this and the Democrats responded on their Twitter page with four tweets. Four of them! I responded to each of those tweets and the blocked me. Typical.

    Their four tweets were:

    (1) claiming that they were just repeating a question asked at an education forum (except they didn't use quotation marks)

    (2) saying I'm entitled to my own opinion, but not my own facts (ironic)

    (3) that "climate change" has been scientifically proven (it hasn't -- "consensus" is not scientific proof), just like evolution (again, it hasn't) and pi not being 3 (cute attempt to ridicule the Bible)

    (4) citing two anything-but-neutral blogs favoring the belief in "climate change"/global warming
    Last edited by Hubie; 09-15-2012 at 02:10 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #18  
    Power CUer
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    10,234
    Quote Originally Posted by Hubie View Post
    I had a brief letter to the editor printed about this and the Democrats responded on their Twitter page with four tweets. Four of them! I responded to each of those tweets and the blocked me. Typical.

    Their four tweets were:

    (1) claiming that they were just repeating a question asked at an education forum (except they didn't use quotation marks)

    (2) saying I'm entitled to my own opinion, but not my own facts (ironic)

    (3) that "climate change" has been scientifically proven (it hasn't -- "consensus" is not scientific proof), just like evolution (again, it hasn't) and pi not being 3 (cute attempt to ridicule the Bible)

    (4) citing two anything-but-neutral blogs favoring the belief in "climate change"/global warming

    Hey Hubie,

    Next time you should ask them about global cooling.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #19  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,468
    Quote Originally Posted by Elspeth View Post
    Hey Hubie,

    Next time you should ask them about global cooling.
    It's the '70s again? (The "consensus" in the '70s was that the Earth was cooling and possibly headed towards an ice age.)
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •