Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1 Romney Locks Up 53% of the Vote 
    LTC Member Odysseus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    FT Belvoir, VA
    Posts
    15,638
    The critical question, which the column addresses, is whether the 53% of the country that pays taxes has more voters than the 47% that doesn't.

    Romney Locks Up 53% of the Vote
    Posted By Zombie On September 18, 2012 @ 2:23 pm In Politics | 115 Comments

    Mitt Romney recently said that 47% of the population pay no taxes while still receiving government benefits. This likely alienated the 47%, who Romney rightly noted are mostly voting for Obama. But it thrilled the 53% who do pay taxes. Because that 53% are sick and tired of moochers calling the shots.

    Every statement any politician makes inspires some percentage of the population while alienating the rest. This is unavoidable. The trick is to find the right balance — the sweet spot is to aim somewhere above 50% and below 90%.

    Why below 90%? Why not make statements that inspire everyone? Because when promises and speeches become overly broad, they quickly become meaningless and bland. A politician who announces “I like ice cream; don’t you like ice cream too?” isn’t going to win any votes, because the statement is uncontroversial to the point of banality.

    Just below that level are the shallow populists, who generally make statements that attempt to please 75% – 90% of the voters, but at the cost of being not particularly believable. “A chicken in every pot and a car in every garage” sounds very nice in theory, but at this stage in history, vague upbeat promises raise as much skepticism as enthusiasm.

    At the other end of the scale, saying things that piss off over 50% of the population is not a wise move for any politician — at least any politician who needs voter approval. Sure, a dictator can get away with seizing all private property and drafting all adults into a pointless war, because he isn’t trying to please anyone and doesn’t need votes to stay in power. Politicians in democracies and republics tend to avoid unpopular moves for this reason.

    And so that leaves us with the real sweet spot, between 50% and 75%. Any statement from any politician which inspires or pleases between 50% and 75% of the public can rightfully be assessed as a smart political move.

    So when Romney drew a line in the sand between the taxpayers and the non-taxpayers, he was in the sweet spot, because it made him less popular with the 47% of non-taxpayers and more popular with the tax-paying 53%.

    Furthermore, he was also correct in his analysis that Obama’s support largely comes from that 47%, as many demographic analyses have shown. The “We want free stuff” crowd votes Democratic, and the “I’m grumpy about paying all those taxes” crowd votes Republican.

    The fly in the ointment is a tiny sliver of the population, probably less than one half of one percent, of hyper-wealthy elite liberals who pay taxes and still vote Democratic. And the reason they’re a problem is that this elite clique of socialist millionaires and self-hating high-earners tend to have undue influence over the media narrative, so when they get pissed off by a Romney statement, they can try to paint it as a “gaffe” which offends the nation.

    In this case, the instant narrative was that Romney’s statement was so horrible that he just lost the election, since the media promises to repeat Romney’s statement over and over until November 6.

    To which I reply: Please do. If Romney just distanced himself from 47% of the electorate, then he drew the remaining 53% closer to him and his statement. And anything that resonates with over 50% of the voters is a winning message. If the media wants to trumpet Romney’s winning message — go for it!

    Conversely, when Obama essentially says the opposite — which he does nearly every day with his various permutations of “Spread the wealth around” and “You didn’t build that” — he is alienating the 53%. He’s outside the sweet spot. And yet somehow that media doesn’t consider those Obama’s statements as “gaffes.”

    And one final point: it may be that only 53% of Americans pay taxes, but that 53% accounts for a much larger percentage of voters. The poor, the indigent, and minorities always vote in far fewer numbers than the middle and upper classes. So Romney’s “controversial” sentence actually appeals to probably over 60% of the voters. And that’s more than he needs to win.





    Article printed from The PJ Tatler: http://pjmedia.com/tatler

    URL to article: http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/09/18...3-of-the-vote/

    Copyright © 2012 Pajamas Media. All rights reserved.
    --Odysseus
    Sic Hacer Pace, Para Bellum.

    Before you can do things for people, you must be the kind of man who can get things done. But to get things done, you must love the doing, not the people!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    3,269
    Central to the argument is whether the 47% who pay no taxes, pay attention. They do not, of course. Opportunity, to them, is merely another way to "get stuff". They could not care less exactly who pays for it, and assume "they" will pay for it, meaning "anyone one but me".

    I'm hopeful about Romney's 53% percent. But last night I had to listen to my wife's friend's husband go on about all the rich people funding Romney and not Obama. Thankfully, his vote (and mine, for that matter) will not count much. Our state is solid Republican. The difference is I will vote; he may not.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,150
    God I hope he wins :(


    I can't take another four years of obama :(
    We're from Philadelphia, We Fight- Chip Kelly
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member LukeEDay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Happy Valley
    Posts
    2,046
    I hope he reached the 53% with his statement. I know it reached me. I am sick of paying for people who are too lazy to get off their butts and get a J.O.B ...

    I love my God, my country, my flag, and my troops ....
    _ WELFARE IS NOT AN ENTITLEMENT! _
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member Janice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Southern USA
    Posts
    2,809
    We need the spread to be as wide as possible ... to make up for the MASSIVE fraud that is absolutely certain to come.
    http://i1220.photobucket.com/albums/dd445/JansGraphix/ConsUndergrd-Sig2.jpg
    Liberalism is just communism sold by the drink.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member LukeEDay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Happy Valley
    Posts
    2,046
    The thing with this is that, no matter how bad he gets beat, obama will call out the lawyers and challenge it.

    I would love to see a Reagan 1984 defeat. But I doubt very highly that that will happen.


    I love my God, my country, my flag, and my troops ....
    _ WELFARE IS NOT AN ENTITLEMENT! _
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Summer of 1980 Poll Flashback: Carter 39%, Reagan 32%, Anderson 21% 
    Senior Member Gina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Western MI
    Posts
    2,360
    Summer of 1980 Poll Flashback: Carter 39%, Reagan 32%, Anderson 21%
    Thanks, Rush.

    This picture sux because you can't read the whole sign but the 53% thing is a winner.



    Btw that's not me, it's from facebook.
    Last edited by Gina; 09-21-2012 at 10:13 PM.
    Good men sleep peaceably in their beds at night because
    rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.



    Real superheroes don't wear capes. They wear dog tags.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member Janice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Southern USA
    Posts
    2,809
    Quote Originally Posted by LukeEDay View Post

    I would love to see a Reagan 1984 defeat. But I doubt very highly that that will happen.
    As I would too. But Reagan ran on solid conservative principles thru and thru as he was a solid conservative thru and thru.

    The GOP would never put up with that from Romney even if he was somehow converted from a nor-eastern rino type. They "created" him ... so they could destroy him .. and would. Just as they did the conservatives who ran against Romney.

    Too bad the left so predominantly represents both the left and "shades" of the right in our political system now. But its quite understandable as it is "only natural". Just as our forefathers had warned. And Gods word talks of this of the world in general.
    http://i1220.photobucket.com/albums/dd445/JansGraphix/ConsUndergrd-Sig2.jpg
    Liberalism is just communism sold by the drink.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    580
    Quote Originally Posted by Janice View Post
    As I would too. But Reagan ran on solid conservative principles thru and thru as he was a solid conservative thru and thru.

    The GOP would never put up with that from Romney even if he was somehow converted from a nor-eastern rino type. They "created" him ... so they could destroy him .. and would. Just as they did the conservatives who ran against Romney.

    Too bad the left so predominantly represents both the left and "shades" of the right in our political system now. But its quite understandable as it is "only natural". Just as our forefathers had warned. And Gods word talks of this of the world in general.
    He was also a converted democrat
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •