What would Obama’s Supreme Court look like?

**txradioguy** · 10-10-2012, 02:50 PM

Originally Posted by Novaheart

Kamala Harris is reportedly a brilliant woman, I don't see it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-G1VGJBWcU

Well Kagan and Sotomayor were supposedly brilliant women too...after listening to them during the Obamacare hearings...I didn't see it there either.

I'm guessing that to Liberal politicians and Obama specifically...brilliant woman = votes Democrat.

**Bailey** · 10-10-2012, 03:18 PM

Originally Posted by txradioguy

He'll have at least two picks if (God forbid) he's re-elected.

My prediction...Holder will take one spot...Kamala Brown will take the other.

That will allow Brown's brother in law Tony West to become the next AG.

And that...would be enough to make Justice drop her scales and weep.

NO WAY IN HELL, would any senate allow Holder to take a seat in the USSC.

**txradioguy** · 10-10-2012, 03:21 PM

Originally Posted by Bailey

NO WAY IN HELL, would any senate allow Holder to take a seat in the USSC.

If Dingy Harry retains his leadership position they will.

**Bailey** · 10-10-2012, 03:57 PM

Originally Posted by txradioguy

If Dingy Harry retains his leadership position they will.

I really doubt his name would even be submitted. The republicans would filibuster on general principles

**NJCardFan** · 10-10-2012, 04:53 PM

Originally Posted by Novaheart

How do you feel about DUI checkpoints and warrantless stops and searches at interior "border" checkpoints fifty miles from any international border?

I don't have a problem with DUI checkpoints. They take 3 seconds out of your day and if you don't drink and drive, you're good and they're usually set up near drinking establishments hence the probable cause/reasonable suspicion. It's a safety issue that saves lives. As for the others, I don't believe them to be constitutional not to mention that I'm a believer that resources are better served elsewhere.

**NJCardFan** · 10-10-2012, 04:58 PM

Originally Posted by txradioguy

If Dingy Harry retains his leadership position they will.

Holder, no. Hillary Clinton, yes. However, don't you need some kind of judicial experience to be on the SC? Actually, I just checked and Kegan has no experience on the bench which, IMO, makes her vastly under-qualified to sit on the highest court in the country. Holder, at least, has experience as a judge.

**m00** · 10-10-2012, 04:59 PM

Originally Posted by NJCardFan

Holder, no. Hillary Clinton, yes. However, don't you need some kind of judicial experience to be on the SC?

technically, no. just like you don't need any executive experience to be president.

**Novaheart** · 10-10-2012, 08:01 PM

Originally Posted by NJCardFan

I don't have a problem with DUI checkpoints. They take 3 seconds out of your day and if you don't drink and drive, you're good.......

Where does the Constitution permit the police to set up checkpoints? Can you imagine any of the Founding Fathers being OK with checkpoints other than in time of war?

**Rockntractor** · 10-10-2012, 08:04 PM

Originally Posted by Novaheart

Where does the Constitution permit the police to set up checkpoints? Can you imagine any of the Founding Fathers being OK with checkpoints other than in time of war?

It's in the same clause that authorizes national healthcare.

**noonwitch** · 10-11-2012, 09:36 AM

Originally Posted by Bailey

NO WAY IN HELL, would any senate allow Holder to take a seat in the USSC.

I agree that he would not get confirmed.

I'm not sure that Obama will keep him on as AG for a second term, should the President get re-elected. He shouldn't. Personally, I think he should pick a RINO or a more conservative democrat to be his AG, to instill a bit more trust among the public.