Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 29
  1. #11  
    Senior Member txradioguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bavaria
    Posts
    7,942
    Quote Originally Posted by Novaheart View Post
    Kamala Harris is reportedly a brilliant woman, I don't see it.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-G1VGJBWcU
    Well Kagan and Sotomayor were supposedly brilliant women too...after listening to them during the Obamacare hearings...I didn't see it there either.

    I'm guessing that to Liberal politicians and Obama specifically...brilliant woman = votes Democrat.
    In Memory Of My Friend 1st Sgt. Tim Millsap A Co, 70th Eng. Bn. 3rd Bde 1st AD...K.I.A. 25 April 2005

    Liberalism Is The Philosophy Of The Stupid

    To Achieve Ordered Liberty You Must Have Moral Order As Well

    The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.
     

  2. #12  
    Senior Member Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,155
    Quote Originally Posted by txradioguy View Post
    He'll have at least two picks if (God forbid) he's re-elected.

    My prediction...Holder will take one spot...Kamala Brown will take the other.

    That will allow Brown's brother in law Tony West to become the next AG.

    And that...would be enough to make Justice drop her scales and weep.
    NO WAY IN HELL, would any senate allow Holder to take a seat in the USSC.
    We're from Philadelphia, We Fight- Chip Kelly
     

  3. #13  
    Senior Member txradioguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bavaria
    Posts
    7,942
    Quote Originally Posted by Bailey View Post
    NO WAY IN HELL, would any senate allow Holder to take a seat in the USSC.
    If Dingy Harry retains his leadership position they will.
    In Memory Of My Friend 1st Sgt. Tim Millsap A Co, 70th Eng. Bn. 3rd Bde 1st AD...K.I.A. 25 April 2005

    Liberalism Is The Philosophy Of The Stupid

    To Achieve Ordered Liberty You Must Have Moral Order As Well

    The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.
     

  4. #14  
    Senior Member Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,155
    Quote Originally Posted by txradioguy View Post
    If Dingy Harry retains his leadership position they will.
    I really doubt his name would even be submitted. The republicans would filibuster on general principles
    We're from Philadelphia, We Fight- Chip Kelly
     

  5. #15  
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    16,155
    Quote Originally Posted by Novaheart View Post
    How do you feel about DUI checkpoints and warrantless stops and searches at interior "border" checkpoints fifty miles from any international border?
    I don't have a problem with DUI checkpoints. They take 3 seconds out of your day and if you don't drink and drive, you're good and they're usually set up near drinking establishments hence the probable cause/reasonable suspicion. It's a safety issue that saves lives. As for the others, I don't believe them to be constitutional not to mention that I'm a believer that resources are better served elsewhere.
    The Obama Administration: Deny. Deflect. Blame.
     

  6. #16  
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    16,155
    Quote Originally Posted by txradioguy View Post
    If Dingy Harry retains his leadership position they will.
    Holder, no. Hillary Clinton, yes. However, don't you need some kind of judicial experience to be on the SC? Actually, I just checked and Kegan has no experience on the bench which, IMO, makes her vastly under-qualified to sit on the highest court in the country. Holder, at least, has experience as a judge.
    The Obama Administration: Deny. Deflect. Blame.
     

  7. #17  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,838
    Quote Originally Posted by NJCardFan View Post
    Holder, no. Hillary Clinton, yes. However, don't you need some kind of judicial experience to be on the SC?
    technically, no. just like you don't need any executive experience to be president.
     

  8. #18  
    Fabulous Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    10,161
    Quote Originally Posted by NJCardFan View Post
    I don't have a problem with DUI checkpoints. They take 3 seconds out of your day and if you don't drink and drive, you're good.......
    Where does the Constitution permit the police to set up checkpoints? Can you imagine any of the Founding Fathers being OK with checkpoints other than in time of war?
     

  9. #19  
    PORCUS MAXIMUS Rockntractor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    42,286
    Quote Originally Posted by Novaheart View Post
    Where does the Constitution permit the police to set up checkpoints? Can you imagine any of the Founding Fathers being OK with checkpoints other than in time of war?
    It's in the same clause that authorizes national healthcare.
    The difference between pigs and people is that when they tell you you're cured it isn't a good thing.
    http://i.imgur.com/FHvkMSE.jpg
     

  10. #20  
    Power CUer noonwitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Warren, MI
    Posts
    12,700
    Quote Originally Posted by Bailey View Post
    NO WAY IN HELL, would any senate allow Holder to take a seat in the USSC.
    I agree that he would not get confirmed.


    I'm not sure that Obama will keep him on as AG for a second term, should the President get re-elected. He shouldn't. Personally, I think he should pick a RINO or a more conservative democrat to be his AG, to instill a bit more trust among the public.
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •