10-10-2012, 04:20 PM
First, there are many things that various plants, animals and insects can do that are written off as an “evolved” trait. The question no Darwinist has ever answered properly is how. If needed traits evolved over time, how did the plant, animal, or insect know it needed that trait? For example, if a beetle is the same color as the plants it lives in, it is commonly said that the beetle evolved that color as a defense against predators. This would seem to denote an intelligent decision: “Things are eating us. We would probably be better off if we were green, like these leaves. Then the things eating us would have a harder time seeing us.”
Second, there are many unanswered questions about how life actually began. There are many theories, but zero proof. A promoter of evolution would say that there is no proof of God either. That just means we’re on the same page, doesn’t it?
Third, there are many species that are essentially unchanged for millions of years. Turn on any National Geographic special about sharks, alligators, many insects and others and at some point you will hear that the subject of the documentary is “essentially unchanged from (insert millions of years here) ago.” How can that be? We are told that species continually evolve to pick up useful traits and lose bad ones. So why have sharks never evolved to breath air or walk up onto the beach so they can swipe some sunbathers to go with their usual fare? Why did all these creatures stop evolving when there are so many things that could be improved upon?
Fourth, there is the whole “missing link” problem. Every other year, we are told that scientists have finally found the missing link between man’s earlier forms and Homo Sapiens. They have found two in the last two years. Wait, was that two missing links?
Last, there is carbon dating. It’s not that accurate, and it doesn’t go back far enough to prove anything. Look it up, kids.
http://www.theconservativereview.com...omething-more/In Memory Of My Friend 1st Sgt. Tim Millsap A Co, 70th Eng. Bn. 3rd Bde 1st AD...K.I.A. 25 April 2005
Liberalism Is The Philosophy Of The Stupid
To Achieve Ordered Liberty You Must Have Moral Order As Well
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.
10-10-2012, 04:54 PM
- Join Date
- May 2010
1) How does a kitten being gray make it more fit. Because Darwin's theory says the fittest survive. Are you suggesting fur pigmentation is genetically tied to birth weight? Because otherwise, this doesnt exactly support Darwin.
2) Darwins theory is about mutations. Did one of the kittens have a mutation to change his color? Or is this simply an inherited trait with a dominant/recessive gene. Because if it's an inherited trait and gene expression, then it doesn't really support Darwin.
10-10-2012, 06:21 PM
The truth of the matter is, we simply don't know and have no way of finding out for sure until we meet our maker. This is why the Theory of Evolution is exactly that: a theory. It's someone's interpretation of how things came to be. That said, what explanation is more plausible; the one where a supreme being got bored and decided to create a planet, day, night, Heaven, earth, animals, and finally man & woman with just a snap of his finger or that a series of happenstances, accidents, and just plain luck? The evolution theory is the latter here. Also, I don't buy into the theory for this reason: everything would have the same DNA if we all sprung from the same goo, no? But as we all know from science class(Lanie) that we can't mate with bugs let alone with a dog or a baboon or a tree. Why don't humans have some kind of venom or stinger? Why can't we breathe under water? Why can't a dog fly? There's just too many differences to think that there wan't some kind of design to the way things are.The Obama Administration: Deny. Deflect. Blame.
10-10-2012, 08:18 PM
I don't know if fur makes a difference in regards to illnesses, but we learned in biology class that race did years ago. A white person is more likely to get Cystic Fibrosis than a black person.Even then, there are particular types of white people who tend to get it. A black person is more likely to get sickle-cell anemia than a white person.
So, imagine all the possibilities when re-producing if they stay within their race vs. when they don't.
In memory of those who have died protecting a society that hasn't always deserved it.
10-10-2012, 08:24 PM
I don't think God has a problem with us thinking this stuff out.
The reason Darwin's theory is called a theory is because it's the theory of how evolution works (natural selection, survival of the fittest). That doesn't make evolution itself unreal. There were scientists such as Mendel finding similar stuff long before Darwin.In memory of those who have died protecting a society that hasn't always deserved it.
10-10-2012, 10:12 PM
- Join Date
- May 2010
So I find it very difficult to argue with you because, based on your posts, you seem to only posses a 5th or 6th grade understanding of the subject. I mean, an understanding of the Theory you are trying to advocate. You are mixing up completely different topics such as genes, genotypes, phenotypes, gene expression, evolution, and Darwin's Theory of Evolution.
I mean, you do realize there is a world of difference between evolution and Darwin's Theory of Evolution. There are tons of theories of evolution. Have you ever heard of Lamarckian evolution? What about Baldwinian Evolution? Darwin formed his theory of evolution to explain the observation that phenotypes in a population tend to shift over time. Nobody is arguing that phenotypes never shift in populations. What we are arguing is the specific mechanics, and whether or not Darwin's theory of these mechanics is an accurate explanation.
Your example on inheritance is like a schoolchild's illustration of the work of Reginald Punnett which is actually a lot more complicated than you make it out to be. So I'm really beginning to doubt whether you understand the subject.
"Usually, it is about genes. However, mutations do happen." I mean honestly -- what does this even mean?
Darwin's Theory is not about how long an organism lives. It is exclusively about how many offspring an organism has, and how many of those offspring are able to produce offspring of their own and pass on genetic material. Darwin's argument is that this is based around fitness for survival. I mean it's like you don't even understand the Theory you are debating.
Because if what I quoted from you were true, Salmon and the Preying Mantis wouldn't exist.
I don't mean to be mean here but maybe I should try arguing for Darwin's Theory, and you should try arguing against. It might be easier for you.
Last edited by m00; 10-10-2012 at 10:19 PM.
10-10-2012, 10:24 PM
Oh, and I didn't forget. I'm still waiting for the Bible passage where it says God created the world in 7 24 hour days(incidentally, it was 6 days. God rested on the 7th hence the Sabbath).The Obama Administration: Deny. Deflect. Blame.
10-10-2012, 10:38 PM
- Join Date
- May 2010
You are making my head spin, Lanie. Let me take a second and unpack this.
It will not die from the heat. It might have a problem competing for food with other predators, but the heat won't kill it.
What's even more interesting, is that polar bears can mate with grizzly bears and produce sexually reproductive offspring, which is generally the litmus test for actually being the same species.
If you want to debate, you need to be accurate about the concepts you are debating.
Last edited by m00; 10-10-2012 at 11:18 PM.
10-10-2012, 11:06 PM
What's missing in this discussion is the Big Bang theory. Now, it's also a theory because it can't be replicated to be examined for provenance. Every religion, at least those that I'm familiar with, contain some concept of a creation. We can now add astrophysics. The Big Bang started as a "nothing", and evolved into a "something" we call the Universe.
I'll add my own. The Universe is infinite in both dimension and duration. It's always been here. At least that's the opinion I came up with after I gave up religion over 55 years ago. I'm confident that it'll always be here even if our galaxy and the cluster it's in go away. That's evolution.
Now, as to evolution. It's observable and very provable by demonstration in both the laboratory and in nature, and it's supported with fossil evidence. So it's not just theory, it's real. Sometimes evolution is punctuate, and sometimes it's adaptive.
Four boxes keep us free: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.
THIS POST WILL BE MONITORED BY THE NSA
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|