#1 Texas schools punish students who refuse to be tracked with microchips10-10-2012, 07:04 PM
A school district in Texas came under fire earlier this year when it announced that it would require students to wear microchip-embedded ID cards at all times. Now, students who refuse to be monitored say they are feeling the repercussions.
Since October 1, students at John Jay High School and Anson Jones Middle School in San Antonio, Texas, have been asked to attend class with photo ID cards equipped with radio-frequency identification (RFID) chips to track every pupil’s location. Educators insist that the endeavor is being rolled out in Texas to stem the rampant truancy devastating the school's funding. If the program is judged successful, the RFID chips could soon come to 112 schools in all and affect nearly 100,000 students.
Students who refuse to walk the school halls with the card in their pocket or around their neck claim they are being tormented by instructors, and are barred from participating in certain school functions. Some also said they were turned away from common areas like cafeterias and libraries.
Andrea Hernandez, a sophomore at John Jay, said educators have ignored her pleas to respect her privacy and told her she cannot participate in school elections if she refuses to comply with the tracking program.
Hernandez said in an interview with Salon that subjecting herself to constant monitoring through an RFID chip is like being branded with the “mark of the beast” – a reference to the Bible's apocalyptic Book of Revelations. When she reached out to WND with the school’s response, though, she said that she was threatened with not being allowed to vote for her school's homecoming king and queen for disobeying the student ID rule.
"I had a teacher tell me I would not be allowed to vote because I did not have the proper voter ID," Hernandez told WND. "I had my old student ID card which they originally told us would be good for the entire four years we were in school. He said I needed the new ID with the chip in order to vote."
After Hernandez refused to wear an RFID chip, WND reported that Deputy Superintendent Ray Galindo issued a statement to the girl's parents: “We are simply asking your daughter to wear an ID badge as every other student and adult on the Jay campus is asked to do.” If she is allowed to forego the tracking now, the repercussions will be harsher than just revoking voting rights for homecoming contests once the school makes location-monitoring mandatory, he argued.
“I urge you to accept this solution so that your child’s instructional program will not be affected. As we discussed, there will be consequences for refusal to wear an ID card as we begin to move forward with full implementation,” Galindo wrote.
The girl’s father, Steve Hernandez, told WND that the school was somewhat willing to work with his daughter, but said that the family is unwilling to “agree to stop criticizing the program” and publically endorse it.
“I told him that was unacceptable because it would imply an endorsement of the district’s policy and my daughter and I should not have to give up our constitutional rights to speak out against a program that we feel is wrong,” Mr. Hernandez responded.
The Northside Independent School District expects to collect upwards of $2 million in state funding by reversing its poor attendance figures, with the RFID program costing around one-quarter of that sum to initiate and another $136,005 in maintenance. The new funding may not offset the other damages that could arise: Heather Fazio of Texans for Accountable Government told WND that she filed a Freedom of Information Act request for $30 and received the names and addresses of every student in the school district.
“Using this information along with an RFID reader means a predator could use this information to determine if the student is at home and then track them wherever they go. These chips are always broadcasting so anyone with a reader can track them anywhere,” she said.
Kirsten Bokenkamp of the ACLU told the San Antonio Express-News earlier this year that her organization expected to challenge the board’s decision to use the tracking system, but the school went ahead with the program undeterred. Steve Hernandez told WND that he approached the ACLU abour representing his daughter’s case, but Rebecca Robertson of a local branch of the organization said that, “the ACLU of Texas will not be able to represent you or your daughter in this matter,” saying the case did not meet the group's criteria.
http://rt.com/usa/news/texas-school-id-hernandez-033/A trojan horse hides its intent and Obama hasn’t we hid our understanding.
10-10-2012, 07:08 PM
Sounds like a reasonable refusal on the part of the students.“A creative man is motivated by the desire to achieve, not by the desire to beat others.” – Ayn Rand
Power Point Ranger
10-10-2012, 07:20 PM
I would never have gone along with being watched like that unless I had done something and was being punished, this is bullshit when all kids are marked as guilty before they have done anything. I don't believe in drug testing either unless the kid has already been busted and is on probation, treating kids or adults as guilty before they have done anything is wrong.A trojan horse hides its intent and Obama hasn’t we hid our understanding.
10-10-2012, 07:59 PM
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
I understand the objection, but at the same time we're treated several times a year to both good and bad parents who claim that the school was responsible for knowing where their child was during the school day.
I myself object to the idea of insurance companies putting recorders in cars "voluntarily" as such volunteerism on the part of some usually leads to involuntary participation required of all.While you were hanging yourself , on someone else's words
Dying to believe in what you heard
I was staring straight into the shining sun
10-10-2012, 10:56 PMThe right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.The Obama Administration: Deny. Deflect. Blame.
10-11-2012, 09:47 AM
I agree with you, although I have no problem with the Detroit Public Schools having metal detectors at all their high schools and middle schools.
I visited my former high school before the class reunion a few weeks ago. I was amazed at not just how much it has grown and the new parts to the campus, the superintendent (who gave us the tour) told us that there are security cameras pretty much everywhere, and once I started looking, I realized how right he was. The kids are all required to wear their ids on lanyards.
When I went there, kids smoked in the bathroom (the "bad girls" bathroom), opened up their locker doors at lunch time to try to conceal their necking and petting behaviors from roving teachers and principals, wore t-shirts with beer company logos and belt buckles with pot leave images , and so on. Not me, obviously, my parents would have never tolerated that kind of thing, but lots of kids. My brother wore a belt buckle with the Budweiser logo on it.
It's amazing we all turned out pretty well.
10-11-2012, 09:51 AM
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
No way in hell I'd let that happen with my kids.
10-11-2012, 10:20 AM
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Northern Virginia
I'm hardly a "mark of the beast" type as mentioned in the article, but this is too Big Brother for me.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|