Results 1 to 10 of 12
#1 MSNBC's Matthews claims it's unconstitutional for Romney to challenge Obama10-20-2012, 11:48 AM
Chris is such an asshole at times...
By Bradley Blakeman
Published October 19, 2012
This week, MSNBC “star” Chris Matthews made the following statement, clearly speaking out of frustration as he watched President Obama wilt under the scrutiny of the second presidential debates where he was challenged repeatedly by Republican Mitt Romney.
“I don’t think he understands the Constitution of the United States…He’s the president of the United States. You don’t say, ‘you’ll get your chance.’”
Chris Matthews was angry with Romney challenging the president on his record during the course of an election to unseat him.
May the FORCE be with you!
10-20-2012, 12:02 PM
That man certainly has a thrill running up something of his for Obama.In most sports, cold-cocking an opposing player repeatedly in the face with a series of gigantic Slovakian uppercuts would get you a multi-game suspension without pay.
In hockey, it means you have to sit in the penalty box for five minutes.
10-20-2012, 12:54 PM
I used to watch HardBall when Chris at least pretended he was neutral but those days are long gone...May the FORCE be with you!
10-20-2012, 03:42 PM
Chris seems to think that Obama is due the same deference as Hugo Chavez or Fidel Castro. This is why the left needs to be kept out of power. They have no grasp of the Constitution or of limited government. They see themselves as our rightful rulers, and any dissent as treason. Challenging our masters is not to be permitted.--Odysseus
Sic Hacer Pace, Para Bellum.
Before you can do things for people, you must be the kind of man who can get things done. But to get things done, you must love the doing, not the people!
10-20-2012, 04:21 PM
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
Why does Matthews think the President is above campaigning and everything that comes with it?
10-22-2012, 03:28 PM
missed his meds againLiberals: Obama's useful Idiots
10-22-2012, 03:30 PM
- Join Date
- May 2010
Where was this logic in 2004?
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|