|
|
I've had a few things to do this weekend and just saw this.
Why the HELL do we have two political parties if one is just going to cave when the other party does something blatantly unconstitutional?
I don't even know where to go with this.
![]()
Except the Supreme Court has said it was Constitutional, and as others have said the House can do nothing about it, absolutely nothing. It'll not get past the Senate, or Obama's veto pen. So why waste resources fighting a battle you cannot at all win?
Now, come 2014 when the full effects of Obamacare are being felt, and if we gain that Senate majority that can overcome a veto, then reattack it, but there is nothing to gain from it right now.
I don't, but there are those who do. The post hospital has a huge backlog on appointments because the demand so exceeds the supply. This is manifested through the number of providers who won't accept TriCare, and the long waits for treatment. A few months ago, I tried to make an appointment for my Periodic Health Assessment, and was told that the first available one would be in a month. How long do you have to wait for a physical?
Health insurance is not rationing. Health insurance is a group of people betting that they will need to pay for a medical procedure at some point in their lives, and a company betting that not enough of them will need it that they can profit off of the premiums. Think of it as a casino, where you are betting that you will get sick, and the house is betting that you won't. The odds are the actuarial tables and the payout is determined by the odds. That's not rationing. Now, if you find betting on needing medical service unpalatable, then you can decide to deal with a fee-for-service plan in which you pay as you go, but either way, you have some measure of control over your medical decisions. With single payer, you don't.
That guy wasn't abusing the system, unless we happened to be paying for his treatment. If that's the case, his negligence shafted the taxpayer. If not, then he's only hurting himself, and he has every right to do that. Regardless, none of this answers any of the points that I made about rationing and reductions in cost, nor does it address the failures of government run medical systems in other countries. You're using irrelevant anecdotal evidence to evade real issues, just like Obama.
From the moment that President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act on August 14, 1935, conservatives have attacked and tried to dismantle the program. Alf Landon, the 1936 Republican presidential candidate, based his entire campaign on attacking Social Security and vowed to "repeal" it.
http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/...ocial-security
http://www.ssa.gov/history/court.html
You're right you Democrats have been worthless as hell for a long time, inventing a supposedly safe retirement plan and then allowing government to steal from it every time they needed money for some other project. Good point Nova, you've been jackwads for 70 years at least!
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |