Results 1 to 7 of 7
|
|
-
#1 Romney Had No Votes in Many Urban Precinctseeeevil Sith Admin
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- FL & MO
- Posts
- 51,099
11-12-2012, 08:44 PM
I'm shocked I tell you!!!
Mon Nov 12, 2012, 06:40 PM
Mass
Romney Had No Votes in Many Urban Precincts
http://politicalwire.com/archives/20...itical+Wire%29
CBS News reports "it is now becoming clear just how lopsided President Obama's victory was in some cities: in dozens of urban precincts, Mitt Romney earned literally zero votes."
"The Phildadelphia Inquirer reported today that, in 59 precincts in inner-city Philadelphia, the GOP nominee received not a single vote. And according to the Cleveland Plain Dealer, nine precincts in Cleveland returned zero Romney votes."
"At first blush, it seems almost impossible: how, even in some of the most heavily Democratic strongholds in the country, could a major party's presidential candidate fail to earn even one vote?"
May the FORCE be with you!
-
CU Royalty
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 8,370
11-12-2012, 08:58 PM
A little more info regarding the 59 Philly precincts:"At first blush, it seems almost impossible: how, even in some of the most heavily Democratic strongholds in the country, could a major party's presidential candidate fail to earn even one vote?"
..."unofficial vote tallies have President Obama outscoring Romney by a combined 19,605 to 0"
I barely scraped by Statistics in college but I really fail to see how that could be statistically possible. Not one mistake? Not one person forgot their glasses that day and voted the wrong ticket? I'm really not buying it.
.Be Not Afraid.
-
#3 Re: Romney Had No Votes in Many Urban PrecinctsFestivus Moderator
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Springfield, USA
- Posts
- 19,312
11-12-2012, 09:02 PM
I bet Truth-is-all could prove it.
Originally Posted by JB
Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender
-
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Tree rats are watching you
- Posts
- 7,891
11-12-2012, 10:33 PM
Romeny lost 2+ million votes. The Chairman lost more than 10 MILLION...
Now, what does this REALLY day?
Bueller? Bueller? Bueller?
On the presidential ticket, I was NOT an euthusiastic (sp?) voter...
It just goes to show, the Chairman has lost more than that....
BUT! We already knew that...Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem.
Ronald Reagan
We could say they are spending like drunken sailors. That would be unfair to drunken sailors, they're spending their OWN money.
Ronald Reagan
R.I.P. Crockspot
-
PORCUS STAPHUS ADMIN
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- oklahoma
- Posts
- 51,129
11-12-2012, 10:37 PM
Originally Posted by Apache
Pffffffffffffffffffffff! Buh Bye Big Ears
-
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Tree rats are watching you
- Posts
- 7,891
11-12-2012, 11:05 PM
That'll do pig. That'll do... Originally Posted by Rockntractor
Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem.
Ronald Reagan
We could say they are spending like drunken sailors. That would be unfair to drunken sailors, they're spending their OWN money.
Ronald Reagan
R.I.P. Crockspot
-
Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- San Jose, California
- Posts
- 7,031
11-12-2012, 11:57 PM
Who'd they have on the ballot there, Obama or Saddam Hussein. Those are the only 2 people to get 100% of the vote....even your average tinpot dictator like Chavez or Castro doesn't get 100%.
Voter shenannigans? Naw, couldn't be.
Solve a man's problem with violence and help him for a day. Teach a man how to solve his problems with violence, help him for a lifetime - Belkar Bitterleaf
Liberalism is what the stupid think is smart.
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Bookmarks |
Bookmarks |
Black caucus has had it with...
Today, 11:29 AM in Best/Worst of DU/Discussionist