SWEDEN'S largest toy chain "gender neutral"

[Rockntractor]

That's kind of harsh. Liberalism is no more a bad thing than Conservativism. It is how people interpret these concepts that creates the problem. Now in regards to this toy company. It is indeed quite interesting but at the same time isn't really causing me any harm. It is a stupid over-corrective decision in a very PC Sweden, but let it stay in Sweden. It isn't affecting us outside of pissing some people off and making some people happy.

The idea that compassion , charity, art etc.... belong to liberalism is bullshit, they exist and have existed in conservatism for a long time but lack the shallowness and lack of sustainability that has developed in liberalism.

[Generation Why?]

The idea that compassion , charity, art etc.... belong to liberalism is bullshit, they exist and have existed in conservatism for a long time but lack the shallowness and lack of sustainability that has developed in liberalism.

The idea that only Conservatives are charitable and compassionate is also bullshit. I never said anyone aspect belonged to a certain group. Charity is charity and compassion is compassion. Regardless of which side of the aisle you sit.

[Rockntractor]

The idea that only Conservatives are charitable and compassionate is also bullshit. I never said anyone aspect belonged to a certain group. Charity is charity and compassion is compassion. Regardless of which side of the aisle you sit.

http://blog.geoiq.com/2009/01/07/dat...-or-democrats/

[Bailey]

The idea that only Conservatives are charitable and compassionate is also bullshit. I never said anyone aspect belonged to a certain group. Charity is charity and compassion is compassion. Regardless of which side of the aisle you sit.

Conservatives give more of their own money while liberals think being charitable consists of giving tax money to lazy people.

[Generation Why?]

http://blog.geoiq.com/2009/01/07/dat...-or-democrats/

This proves that Republicans give more. It doesn't prove that Democrats don't give at all.

[Rockntractor]

This proves that Republicans give more. It doesn't prove that Democrats don't give at all.

No where did I say they give nothing, are you that fucking dense? What that showed was almost triple giving by conservatives.

[Rockntractor]

Conservatives give more of their own money while liberals think being charitable consists of giving tax money to lazy people.

There is nothing generous about giving away other peoples money, I'm getting tired of these socialists here that claim they are libertarian and conservative, they are frauds.

[Generation Why?]

There is nothing generous about giving away other peoples money, I'm getting tired of these socialists here that claim they are libertarian and conservative, they are frauds.

So you're argument is being charitable is owned by Conservatives because they give more? Because that is how I am reading it. If I am mistaken please feel free to elaborate.

[Rockntractor]

So you're argument is being charitable is owned by Conservatives because they give more? Because that is how I am reading it. If I am mistaken please feel free to elaborate.

I said what I meant in my posts, put the bong down and read them.

[Generation Why?]

I said what I meant in my posts, put the bong down and read them.

What I read is that because Conservatives give more, they own the concept. Which I argue.