Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11  
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    15,860
    Remove the 2nd and the 1st will be gone along with it. They are co-joined. How about this for a conspiracy bouncy: The shooter was a patsy for the far left anti-gun nuts. He was sacrificed to further their agenda.
    The Obama Administration: Deny. Deflect. Blame.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    SEAduced SuperMod Hawkgirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    4,010
    Where are all the liberals who are screaming for violent movies and video games to be censored?...You won't see that because the Spielberg's of Hollywood still need to make their millions while marketing all their violence to children. What we need is a return to Church and God in our school system.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    8,920
    Quote Originally Posted by NJCardFan View Post
    Remove the 2nd and the 1st will be gone along with it. They are co-joined. How about this for a conspiracy bouncy: The shooter was a patsy for the far left anti-gun nuts. He was sacrificed to further their agenda.
    Hmmm....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #14  
    LTC Member Odysseus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    FT Belvoir, VA
    Posts
    15,638
    Quote Originally Posted by noonwitch View Post
    Yes. Violent, mentally ill people should not be allowed access to guns or cars.
    How about we go back to institutionalizing those kinds of people? One of them pushed a guy in front of a subway train a few weeks ago, and didn't need a gun to do it. Violent, mentally ill people should not be allowed access, period.
    --Odysseus
    Sic Hacer Pace, Para Bellum.

    Before you can do things for people, you must be the kind of man who can get things done. But to get things done, you must love the doing, not the people!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #15  
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    15,860
    Quote Originally Posted by Odysseus View Post
    How about we go back to institutionalizing those kinds of people? One of them pushed a guy in front of a subway train a few weeks ago, and didn't need a gun to do it. Violent, mentally ill people should not be allowed access, period.
    These people think that if there were no guns there would be no murder or evil. I would ask them: what kind of gun did Timothy McVeigh use?
    The Obama Administration: Deny. Deflect. Blame.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #16  
    SEAduced SuperMod Hawkgirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    4,010
    The whole "no guns" "repeal the 2nd ammendment" is ridiculous because if the liberal fantasy of a gun free america came true, we have Mexico at our southern border who would gladly funnel in assault weapons to the criminals and anyone with $ to buy them.

    It's another utopian dream that will never come true. But for them, no travesty is useless for promotion of their cause.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #17  
    Senior Member Dan D. Doty's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Pevely, Missouri
    Posts
    2,953
    Quote Originally Posted by NJCardFan View Post
    Remove the 2nd and the 1st will be gone along with it. They are co-joined. How about this for a conspiracy bouncy: The shooter was a patsy for the far left anti-gun nuts. He was sacrificed to further their agenda.
    Too true.

    If try to get rid of all guns, you must also get rid of all knowledge of guns.

    It seems that the Bill Of Rights is the Moonbats #1 enemy.
    CU's Paranormal Expert.


    Keep your powder dry, your sword sharp and your wits intact.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •