Thread: Is Newtown Making Such News Because The Kids Are Mostly White?

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23
  1. #1 Is Newtown Making Such News Because The Kids Are Mostly White? 
    Senior Member Jim54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    East Texas
    Posts
    351
    http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022045260

    Fri Dec 21, 2012, 04:20 AM
    Kennah (6,147 posts)

    Is Newtown Making Such News Because The Kids Are Mostly White?
    On Wednesday night, my brother and I were talking on the phone. I am not sure which one of us said it first, but we both agreed that the news coverage for the Newtown massacre was only as intense as it was because most of the children murdered were white.

    On Thursday, I heard Norm Goldman discussing this very issue, and it sent my mind racing.

    In 1989, an armed man murdered 5 children and wounded 29 others at the Cleveland Elementary School in Stockton, California. The murderer was white, I won't name him and give him any glory, but there are dozens of pictures of him online.

    The 5 murdered children, 1 little boy and 4 little girls, ranged in age from 6 to 9 years, and they were Cambodian and Vietnamese immigrants. I am a pretty skilled Internet sleuther, but it took me a while to find pictures of them in this YouTube video and still picture. Until today, I cannot EVER remember seeing the faces of these 5 murdered beautiful children shown anywhere.

    Oeun Lim, Age 8
    Ram Chun, Age 8
    Rathanar Or, Age 9
    Sokhim An, Age 6
    Thuy Tran, Age 6

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_School_massacre


    Gee, nobody saw this coming!

    Racists, racists everywhere!

    Tell me...Is the grief experienced by the surviving loved ones of these innocent victims somehow different from those who experienced similar pain simply because of their skin's melanin content? These types of threads at the DUmp exhibit a level of calculating coldness that I have a hard time attempting to comprehend. Progressivism truly is a monstrous ideology.
    I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Fabulous Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    10,161
    There is reportedly a commonly held belief amongst American negroes that when a 17 year old blonde white girl goes missing it's presumed that she has been abducted while if a 17 year old dark skinned Negro girl goes missing it's presumed that she has either taken to the streets or is somehow party to her own disappearance.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Hmm... 
    Senior Member Jim54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    East Texas
    Posts
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by Novaheart View Post
    There is reportedly a commonly held belief amongst American negroes that when a 17 year old blonde white girl goes missing it's presumed that she has been abducted while if a 17 year old dark skinned Negro girl goes missing it's presumed that she has either taken to the streets or is somehow party to her own disappearance.
    I didn't know that. I can tell you from growing up in the "hood" (and it was pretty ghetto-like) that black people think white people smell like dogs when our hair is wet. I took alot of ribbing about this in my younger days before the inevitable separation of childhood friends into social peer groups occured. Woof! Woof!
    I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    LTC Member Odysseus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    FT Belvoir, VA
    Posts
    15,639
    Quote Originally Posted by Novaheart View Post
    There is reportedly a commonly held belief amongst American negroes that when a 17 year old blonde white girl goes missing it's presumed that she has been abducted while if a 17 year old dark skinned Negro girl goes missing it's presumed that she has either taken to the streets or is somehow party to her own disappearance.
    Tawana Brawley didn't exactly help that perception.

    I go by the age of the kid, rather than the race. Up to about twelve, my immediate thought is abduction. Fifteen and above, I figure that runaway. especially if there's a significant other involved. The grey area is the early teens, when there are so many variables that could be in play.
    Last edited by Odysseus; 12-21-2012 at 12:16 PM.
    --Odysseus
    Sic Hacer Pace, Para Bellum.

    Before you can do things for people, you must be the kind of man who can get things done. But to get things done, you must love the doing, not the people!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    11
    Though the pain would be the same, I doubt the dignity that I observed in the conduct of the self disciplined community of relatives and friends of the murdered children in Newtown, Conn. would be equally as dignified in a community that looks to the al sharptons and jesse jacksons of this country for whatever it is that is substituted for and then demonstrated for in the streets....where civilized behaviour and dignity is called for.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member Madisonian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Peoples Democratic Socialist Republic of Michiganistanovia
    Posts
    2,410
    Could it be because a bunch of dead black kids in Detroit, Chicago, D.C. L.A. or Newark, usually as the result of drug related, gang or drive-by shootings, is sadly nothing really all that uncommon?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Racial Crime Statistics Are Interesting 
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    11
    Attorney General Holder has slowly but surely been losing or hiding some of the racial crime statistics that had typically been kept and published by the DOJ. For your leftwing buddies who say they love statistics and facts, you may wish to drop the statistics below on them.

    From the DOJ's Bureau of Justice Statistics report titled "Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2005 Statistical Tables", subtitled "National Crime Victimization Survey", the only report I've seen that still remains on the DOJ's website at http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus05.pdf, TABLE 42:

    Total Rapes of White and Black Females in the USA = 148,110
    Total Rapes of White Females = 111,490
    Total Rapes of Black Females = 36,620
    Total White Females Raped by Black Males = 37,461
    Total White Females Raped by White Males = 49,614
    Total Black Females Raped by Black Males = 36,620
    Total Black Females Raped by White Males = 0

    Black Males committed more total rapes than did White Males, although they represent just 18% of the white population. Before some mathematician points out that the last four numbers above don't add up to the 148,110 total, it's because the delta number of rapes were committed by persons of other ethnicities or unknown ethnicities.

    In the DOJ's crime category titled "Crimes of Violence", which I believe may include the above rapes, the statistics indicate that Blacks are more than 8 times as likely to commit a violent crime against a white person as whites are to commit violence against Blacks.

    Before some leftist demogogue accuses me of "racism" for pointing out facts, I am not accusing all Blacks of being violent. I AM accusing those leftists who tell us that Blacks are being raped and killed left and right by Whites of LYING!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    30 lat. x 90 lon.
    Posts
    18
    Data collection
    The data presented in Crime in the United States reflect the Hierarchy Rule, which requires that only the most serious offense in a multiple-offense criminal incident be counted. The descending order of UCR violent crimes are murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault

    So, a criminal could break into a house, kidnap a person, steal a car, rob a drugstore, shoot at the police, rape the victim, murder the victim and spit on the sidewalk and it would only be counted by the UCR as 1 crime. The murder.
    In reality there were appx 6 million violent crimes committed in the u.s.

    Here are some accurate stats according to population and race. You'll notice a hugely disproportionate number of blacks are represented.
    Remember, percentage is the key. According to the raw data, USUALLY whites commit more crime..but notice that as a smaller percentage of the population more crimes are committed by blacks
    Fewer blacks but higher numbers, see?

    http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2006/data/table_43.html
    http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2006/data/table_49.html
    http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2006/data/table_55.html
    http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2006/data/table_61.html
    http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2006/data/table_67.html

    Here are some more stats from solid, reliable, thoroughly researched and verified sources.
    This one you may have seen before and it's a bit older but as the population has risen generally so have crime numbers.

    Statistics that compare race and crime are hard to locate (for SOME reason) these days. The negro glorifying media (and Holder) WANT the stats to be hidden.

    Statistics
    *More than 1,600 Whites are murdered by Blacks each year. Blacks murder Whites at 18 times the rate Whites murder Blacks.
    *About 1 million Whites were murdered, robbed, assaulted, or raped by Blacks in 1992
    *In the last 30 years, 170 million violent and nonviolent crimes were committed by Blacks against Whites in the U.S.
    *Blacks commit 7.5 times more violent interracial crimes than Whites, although they comprise only one-seventh of the White population.
    *27 million nonviolent crimes were committed in the U.S. in 1992 alone. 31% of the robberies involved Black offenders and White victims; only 2% involved White offenders and Black victims.
    The above stats were collected by an Australian reporter, Neil Sheehan, who dug out half-concealed U.S. crime figures for an article in the Sydney Morning Herald (May 2, 1995). The contents of his article, he commented, could not possibly be published or discussed in the U.S. mainstream media.

    Paved With Good Intentions, a book by Jared Taylor, also studies crime statistics by race. It must be stressed that Blacks make up only 12% of the population according to the 1990 U.S. census (and Black males about 6%), but they commit a vastly disproportionate number of violent crime.
    Mr. Taylor reveals:
    1) 58% of all arrests for weapons violations are Blacks.
    2) 46% of all arrests for violent crimes are Blacks.
    3) 73% of all “justified self-defense” killings are committed by Blacks.
    4) 60.5% of all Blacks are armed with some type of weapon at all times.
    5) 98% of all youths arrested for gun fights in Atlanta are Blacks.


    These are FEDERAL statistics verified by the Department of Justice.


    *Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery.
    *Blacks are three times more likely to use a hand gun, and twice more likely to use a knife.
    *Blacks are 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against whites then vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit a robbery.
    *Forty-five percent of black crime is against whites, 43 against other blacks, and 10 percent against Hispanic.

    http://www.examiner.com/article/fede...ation-formulas


    Here are some newer statistics from 2005. Again..race comparisons are VERY VERY hard to collate in these "progressive" times. Not that they're "hidden" but no one likes to see them and they are HARD to find..

    The Color of Crime: Race, Crime, and Justice in America. Second, Expanded Edition, 2005

    http://colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.html

    Major Findings:

    Police and the justice system are not biased against minorities.

    Crime Rates

    Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery.
    When blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times more likely than non-blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a knife.
    Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly three times the white rate, and Asians commit violent crimes at about one quarter the white rate.
    The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic.

    Interracial Crime

    Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.
    Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.
    Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.
    Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimes against whites than vice versa.

    Gangs

    Only 10 percent of youth gang members are white.
    Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely.

    Incarceration

    Between 1980 and 2003 the US incarceration rate more than tripled, from 139 to 482 per 100,000, and the number of prisoners increased from 320,000 to 1.39 million.
    Blacks are seven times more likely to be in prison than whites. Hispanics are three times more likely.

    The Color of Crime is an expanded version of a monograph on crime first published by NCF in 1999.



    Of course what do I know?
    I'm just a stupidracistignorantredneckbigotsupremacist.
    Last edited by xbow; 12-23-2012 at 10:41 AM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Fabulous Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    10,161
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim54 View Post
    I didn't know that. I can tell you from growing up in the "hood" (and it was pretty ghetto-like) that black people think white people smell like dogs when our hair is wet. I took alot of ribbing about this in my younger days before the inevitable separation of childhood friends into social peer groups occured. Woof! Woof!
    Some blacks have desperately tried to craft racial insults which they believe could hurt the feelings of whites. In actually, do you really give a shit? Of course not. That's a double edged sword though. While blacks really don't have the ability to hurt white people's feelings or come up with a word that has the impact of '******' or even some of the more colorful epithets, this feeds the Black construct that Black people can't be racist because they don't have the power. Moreover, it allows them to retain the high ground of outrage when someone actually does call them a racial epithet.

    Wet dog, inbreds, pinkies, white devil, cracker, etc..... find me a white person whose feelings are hurt by this and I'll show you a moron.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Fabulous Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    10,161
    Quote Originally Posted by xbow View Post
    Data collection
    Remember, percentage is the key. According to the raw data, USUALLY whites commit more crime.. .
    This is undoubtedly part of the reason that academia, the media, and some in government are trying to redefine "caucasian" to "white people". "White people" is a meaningless term used in lieu of the proper racial classification because they want to make the White population smaller. It's not only a statistics game, it's a head game.

    Ask a college student what percent of the US population is caucasian and they will likely guess "around 50%". This is because they are being fed the lie that white people will be in the minority by 2040 and because they probably went to a public high school that was considered 60% or 70% nonwhite.

    This game is played by ignoring all that we know about race and racial transformation. It's also played by lying and sleight of hand.

    For example: latinos (caucasians of Spanish or Mestizo ancestry who identify as white) are considered "people of color" or "nonwhite" when they are victims of crimes, but are counted as caucasian by the justice/prison system.

    Lawrence O'Donnell and his bunch define "White people" as only western and northern Europeans (with exceptions) Celts, Norse, Rus, Saxons and grudgingly the Spanish and Italians but oddly not the Portuguese. Certainly not the Turks, grudgingly the Serbs, but not the Armenians, etc...

    It's bullshit they way they do this. But it's working.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •